References
- Fokas A, Fuchssteiner B. Symplectic structures, their Bäcklund transformation and hereditary symmetries. J Phys D. 1981;4:47–66. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(81)90004-X
- Camassa R, Holm D. An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993;71:1661–1664. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661
- Lenells J. Conservation laws of the Camassa–Holm equation. J Phys A Math Gen. 2005;38:869–880. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/4/007
- Constantin A. On the scattering problem for the Camassa–Holm equation. Proc Roy Soc London. 2001;457:953–970. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2000.0701
- Ivanov R. Extended Camassa–Holm hierarchy and conserved quantities. Zeitschr Naturforsch A. 2006;61:133–138. doi: 10.1515/zna-2006-3-404
- Boutet de Monvel A, Shepelsky D. Riemann–Hilbert approach for the Camassa–Holm equation on the line. Comp Rend Acad Sci Paris. 2006;343:627–632. doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2006.10.014
- Constantin A, Gerdjikov V, Ivanov R. Inverse scattering transform for the Camassa–Holm equation. Inverse Probl. 2006;22:2197–2207. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/6/017
- Constantin A. Existence of permanent and breaking waves for a shallow water equation: a geometric approach. Annal l'Institut Fourier (Grenoble). 2000;50:321–362. doi: 10.5802/aif.1757
- Constantin A, Escher J. Global existence and blow-up for a shallow water equation. Ann Scuol Normal Superior Pisa. Class Sci Ser IV. 1998;26:303–328.
- Constantin A, Escher J. Wave breaking for nonlinear nonlocal shallow water equations. Acta Math. 1998;181:229–243. doi: 10.1007/BF02392586
- Li Y, Olver P. Well-posedness and blow-up solutions for an integrable nonlinearly dispersive model wave equation. J Differ Equ. 2000;162:27–63. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1999.3683
- Beals R, Sattinger D, Szmigielski J. Acoustic scattering and the extended Korteweg–de Vries hierarchy. Adv Math. 1998;140:190–206. doi: 10.1006/aima.1998.1768
- Bressan A, Constantin A. Global conservative solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation. Arch Ration Mech Anal. 2007;183:215–239. doi: 10.1007/s00205-006-0010-z
- Bressan A, Constantin A. Global dissipative solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation. Anal Appl (Singapore). 2007;5:1–27. doi: 10.1142/S0219530507000857
- Holden H, Raynaud X. Global conservative solutions of the Camassa–Holm equation – a Lagrangian point of view. Commun Partial Differ Equ. 2007;32:1511–1549. doi: 10.1080/03605300601088674
- Holden H, Raynaud X. Dissipative solutions for the Camassa–Holm equation. Discrete Contin Dyn Sys. 2009;24:1047–1112. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.24.1047
- Bressan A, Chen G, Zhang Q. Uniqueness of Conservative solutions to the Camassa–Holm equation via characteristics. Discrete Contin Dyn Sys. 2015;35:25–42.
- Fu Y, Qu C. Well-posedness and blow-up solution for a new coupled Camassa–Holm equations with peakons. J Math Phys. 2009;50:677–702. doi: 10.1063/1.3064810
- Fu Y, Liu Y, Qu C. Well-posedness and blow-up solution for a modified two-component periodic Camassa–Holm system with peakons. Math Annalen. 2010;348:415–448. doi: 10.1007/s00208-010-0483-9
- Tian L, Yan W, Gui G. On the local well posedness and blow-up solution of a coupled Camassa–Holm equations in Besov spaces. J Math Phys. 2012;53:1–10.
- Zhou S. Non-uniform dependence and persistence properties for a coupled Camassa–Holm equations. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2017;40:3718–3732. doi: 10.1002/mma.4258
- Tian L, Xu Y. Attractor for a viscous coupled Camassa–Holm equation. Adv Differ Equ. 2010;2010:1–30. doi: 10.1155/2010/512812
- Tian L, Wang Y. Global conservative and dissipative solutions of a coupled Camassa–Holm equations. J Math Phys. 2011;52:1–29. doi: 10.1063/1.3600216
- Guan C. Uniqueness of global conservative weak solutions for the modified two component Camassa–Holm system. J Evol Equ. 2018;18:1003–1024. doi: 10.1007/s00028-018-0430-x
- Cai H, Tan Z. Uniqueness of conservative solutions to the modified two component Camassa–Holm system via characteristics. J Math Anal Appl. 2018;461:1067–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.01.057
- Li M, Zhang Q. Generic regularity of conservative solutions to Camassa–Holm type equations. SIAM J Math Anal. 2017;49:2920–2949. doi: 10.1137/16M1063009