A consistent projection finite element method for the incompressible MHD equations

References

• Moreau R. Magnetohydrodynamics. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbeau J. Element method for the incompressible magnetohydrodynamic equations. Numer Math. 2000;87:83–111. doi: 10.1007/s002110000193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbeau J, LeBris C, Lelivre T. Mathematical method for the magnetohydrodynamics of liquid metals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• He Y. Unconditional convergence of the Euler semi-implicit scheme for the 3D incompressible MHD equations. IMA J Numer Anal. 2015;35:767–801. doi: 10.1093/imanum/dru015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton W, Tran H, Trenchea C. Numerical analysis of two parititioned methods for uncoupling evolutionary MHD flows. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2014;30:1083–1102. doi: 10.1002/num.21857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksel G, Ingram R. Numerical analysis of a finite element. Crank-Nicolson discretization for MHD flows at small magnetic Reynolds numbers. Int J Numer Anal Model. 2013;10:74–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sermange M, Temam R. Some mathematical questions related to the MHD equations. Comm Pure Appl Math. 1983;36:635–664. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160360506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzburger M, Meir A, Peterson J. On the existence, uniqueness, and finite element approximation of solutions of the equations of stationary, incompressible magnetohydrodynamics. Math Comp. 1991;56:523–563. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1991-1066834-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotzau D. Mixed finite element methods for stationary incompressible magnetohydrodynamics. Numer Math. 2004;96:771–800. doi: 10.1007/s00211-003-0487-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzburger M, Trenchea C. Optimal control of the time-periodic MHD equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2005;63:1687–1699. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2005.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin S, Nesliturk A, Tezer-Sezgin M. Two-level finite element method with a stabilizing subgrid for the incompressible MHD equations. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 2010;62:188–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, He Y. Decoupled schemes for unsteady MHD equations. II Finite element spatial discretization and numerical implementation. Comput Math Appl. 2015;69:1390–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, He Y. Unconditional convergence of the Euler semi-implicit scheme for the 3D incompressible MHD equations: numerical implementation. Inter J Numer Method Heat Fluid Flow. 2015;25:1912–1923. doi: 10.1108/HFF-08-2014-0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, He Y. Decoupled schemes for unsteady MHD equations. I: time discretization. Numer Method Part Diff Equ. 2017;33:956–973. doi: 10.1002/num.22132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, He Y. Stability and error analysis for the first-order Euler implicit/explicit scheme for the 3D MHD equations. Int J Comput Methods. 2017;1750077. DOI:10.1142/S0219876217500773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su H, Feng X, Huang P. Iterative methods in penalty finite element discretization for the steady MHD equations. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng. 2016;304:521–545. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Y, Yang Y, Si Z. Error estimate of a fully discrete defect correction finite element method for unsteady incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equations. Appl Anal. 2017. DOI:10.1080/00036811.2017.1366990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si Z, Jing S, Wang Y. Defect correction finite element method for the stationary incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equation. Appl Math Comput. 2016;285:184–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si Z, Liu C, Wang Y. A semi-discrete defect correction finite element method for unsteady incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equations. Math Method Appl Sci. 2017;40:4179–4196. doi: 10.1002/mma.4296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezzi F, Fortin M. Mixed and hybrid finite element methods. New York: Springer; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner SC, Scott LR. The mathematical theory of finite element methods. New York: Springer; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Girault V, Raviart P. Finite element methods for the Navier-Stokes equations. New York: Springer; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Chorin A. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math Comput. 1968;22:745–762. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1968-0242392-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temam R. Sur lápproximation de la solution des Équations de Navier-Stokes par la Méthode de pas fractionnaires II. Arch Ration Mech Anal. 1969;33:377–385. doi: 10.1007/BF00247696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oseledets V. On a new form of writing out the Navier-Stokes equation. Russ Math Surv. 1989;44:210–211. doi: 10.1070/RM1989v044n03ABEH002122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, E W. Gauge method for viscous incompressible flows. Comm Math Sci. 2003;1:317–332. doi: 10.4310/CMS.2003.v1.n2.a9
   Google Scholar
• Nochetto R, Pyo J. The Gauge-Uzawa finite element method. part I: the Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2005;43:1043–1086. doi: 10.1137/040609756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si Z, Li W, Wang Y. A gauge-Uzawa finite element method for the time-dependent viscoelastic Oldroyd flows. J Math Anal Appl. 2015;425:96–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochetto R, Pyo J. The Gauge-Uzawa finite element method. part II: the Boussinesq equations. Math Model Method Appl Sci. 2006;16:1599–1626. doi: 10.1142/S0218202506001649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo J. Optimal error estimate for semi-discrete Gauge-Uzawa method for the Navier-Stokes equations. Bull Korean Math Soc. 2009;46:627–644. doi: 10.4134/BKMS.2009.46.4.627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo J. Error estimate for the second order semi-discrete stabilized Gauge-Uzawa method for the Navier-Stokes equations. Int J Numer Anal Model. 2013;10:24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochetto R, Pyo J. Optimal relaxation parameter for the Uzawa methods. Numer Math. 2004;98:696–702. doi: 10.1007/s00211-004-0522-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochetto R, Pyo J. Error estimates for the semi-discrete Gauge methods for the Navier-Stokes equations. Math Comp. 2005;74:521–542. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-04-01687-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo J. The Gauge-Uzawa and related projection finite element [PhD dissertation]. University of Maryland; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Temam R. Navier-Stokes equations: theorey and numerical analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Galdi G. An induction to the mathematical theorey of the Navier-Stokes equations, steady-state problems. New York: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• He Y. Two-level method based on finite element and Crank-Nicolson extrapolation for the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2003;41:1263–1285. doi: 10.1137/S0036142901385659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantin P, Foias C. Navier-Stokes equations. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1988. (Chicago Lecture in Math).
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg R, Osborn J. A regularity result for stokes problems in a convex polygon. J Funct Anal. 1976;21:397–431. doi: 10.1016/0022-1236(76)90035-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauge M. Stationary stokes and Navier-Stokes systems on two or three-dimensional domains with corners. SIAM J Math Anal. 1989;20:74–97. doi: 10.1137/0520006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht F. New development in FreeFem++. J Numer Math. 2012;20:251–265. doi: 10.1515/jnum-2012-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar