Adaptive BEM for elliptic PDE systems, part I: abstract framework, for weakly-singular integral equations

References

• Feischl M, Führer T, Karkulik M, et al. Quasi-optimal convergence rates for adaptive boundary element methods with data approximation, part I: weakly-singular integral equation. Calcolo. 2014;51(4):531–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Führer T, Karkulik M, et al. Quasi-optimal convergence rates for adaptive boundary element methods with data approximation, part II: hyper-singular integral equation. Electron Trans Numer Anal. 2015;44:153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Karkulik M, Markus Melenk J, et al. Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an adaptive boundary element method. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2013;51(2):1327–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantumur T. Adaptive boundary element methods with convergence rates. Numer Math. 2013;124(3):471–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aurada M, Feischl M, Führer T, et al. Local inverse estimates for non-local boundary integral operators. Math Comp. 2017;86(308):2651–2686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen C, Feischl M, Page M, et al. Axioms of adaptivity. Comput Math Appl. 2014;67(6):1195–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bespalov A, Betcke T, Haberl A, et al. Adaptive BEM with optimal convergence rates for the Helmholtz equation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 2019;346:260–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Gantner G, Haberl A, et al. Optimal convergence for adaptive IGA boundary element methods for weakly-singular integral equations. Numer Math. 2017;136(1):147–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantner G, Praetorius D, Schimanko S. Adaptive isogeometric boundary element methods with local smoothness control. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2020;30:261–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantner G, Haberlik D, Praetorius D. Adaptive IGAFEM with optimal convergence rates: hierarchical B-splines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2017;27(14):2631–2674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantner G, Praetorius D. Adaptive IGAFEM with optimal convergence rates: T-splines. Comput Aided Geom Design. 2020;81:101906.
   Google Scholar
• Gantner G, Praetorius D. Adaptive BEM for elliptic PDE systems, part II: isogeometric analysis for weakly-singular integral equations. In Preparation. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Faermann B. Localization of the Aronszajn–Slobodeckij norm and application to adaptive boundary elements methods. Part I. The two-dimensional case. IMA J Numer Anal. 2000;20(2):203–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faermann B. Localization of the Aronszajn–Slobodeckij norm and application to adaptive boundary element methods. Part II. The three-dimensional case. Numer Math. 2002;92(3):467–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen C, Maischak M, Stephan EP. A posteriori error estimate and h-adaptive algorithm on surfaces for Symm's integral equation. Numer Math. 2001;90(2):197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Gantner G, Haberl A, et al. Adaptive 2D IGA boundary element methods. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2016;62:141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantner G. Optimal adaptivity for splines in finite and boundary element methods. PhD thesis, Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, TU Wien, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mitscha-Eibl G. Adaptive BEM und FEM-BEM-Kopplung für die Lamé-Gleichung. Master's thesis, Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, TU Wien, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• McLean W. Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach O. Numerical approximation methods for elliptic boundary value problems. New York: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sauter SA, Schwab C. Boundary element methods. Berlin: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann S, Mitrea M, Taylor M. Singular integrals and elliptic boundary problems on regular Semmes–Kenig– Toro domains. Int Math Res Not. 2009;2010(14):2567–2865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nezza E, Palatucci G, Valdinoci E. Hitchhiker' s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull Sci Math. 2012;136(5):521–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Führer T, Mitscha-Eibl G, Praetorius D, et al. Convergence of adaptive BEM and adaptive FEM-BEM coupling for estimators without h-weighting factor. Comput Meth Appl Math. 2014;14(4):485–508.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen C. An a posteriori error estimate for a first-kind integral equation. Math Comp. 1997;66(217):139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen C, Stephan EP. Adaptive boundary element methods for some first kind integral equations. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1996;33(6):2166–2183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bespalov A, Haberl A, Praetorius D. Adaptive FEM with coarse initial mesh guarantees optimal convergence rates for compactly perturbed elliptic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 2017;317:318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aurada M, Feischl M, Führer T, et al. Efficiency and optimality of some weighted-residual error estimator for adaptive 2D boundary element methods. Comput Methods Appl Math. 2013;13(3):305–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson R. The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by bisection. Math Comp. 2008;77(261):227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binev P, Dahmen W, DeVore R. Adaptive finite element methods with convergence rates. Numer Math. 2004;97(2):219–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson R. Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method. Found Comput Math. 2007;7(2):245–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkulik M, Pavlicek D, Praetorius D. On 2D newest vertex bisection: optimality of mesh-closure and H1-stability of L2-projection. Constr Approx. 2013;38(2):213–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel Cascon J, Kreuzer C, Nochetto RH, et al. Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an adaptive finite element method. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2008;46(5):2524–2550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong A-V, Giannelli C, Jüttler B, et al. A hierarchical approach to adaptive local refinement in isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 2011;200(49):3554–3567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern P, Peterseim D. Analysis-suitable adaptive T-mesh refinement with linear complexity. Comput Aided Geom Design. 2015;34:50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen C, Faermann B. Mathematical foundation of a posteriori error estimates and adaptive mesh-refining algorithms for boundary integral equations of the first kind. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2001;25(7):497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Gantner G, Praetorius D. Reliable and efficient a posteriori error estimation for adaptive IGA boundary element methods for weakly-singular integral equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 2015;290:362–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackbusch W. Integral equations: theory and numerical treatment. Basel: Birkhäuser; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz-Leite S, Praetorius Dirk. Simple a posteriori error estimators for the h-version of the boundary element method. Computing. 2008;83(4):135–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen C, Praetorius D. Averaging techniques for the effective numerical solution of symm's integral equation of the first kind. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2006;27(4):1226–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrey Jr CB. Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations. Springer, Berlin, reprint of the 1966 original edition, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Feischl M, Führer T, Praetorius D. Adaptive FEM with optimal convergence rates for a certain class of nonsymmetric and possibly nonlinear problems. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2014;52(2):601–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar