Analysis of the heart-torso conductivity parameters recovery inverse problem in cardiac electrophysiology ECG modelling

References

• Nguyen DM, Qian P, Barry T, et al. The region-of-interest based measurement selection process for electrical impedance tomography in radiofrequency cardiac ablation with known anatomical information. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;56:101706.
   Google Scholar
• Sulkin MS, Laughner JI, Hilbert S, et al. Novel measure of local impedance predicts catheter–tissue contact and lesion formation. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophys. 2018;11(4):e005831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerc L. Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. J Physiol (Lond). 1976;255(2):335–346.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts DE, Hersh LT, Scher AM. Influence of cardiac fiber orientation on wavefront voltage, conduction velocity, and tissue resistivity in the dog. Circ Res. 1979;44(5):701–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DE, Scher AM. Effect of tissue anisotropy on extracellular potential fields in canine myocardium in situ. Circ Res. 1982;50(3):342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundnes J, Lines GT, Cai X, et al. Computing the electrical activity in the heart. Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tung L. A bi-domain model for describing ischemic myocardial dc potentials [PhD thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Clements JC, Nenonen J, Li P, et al. Activation dynamics in anisotropic cardiac tissue via decoupling. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32(7):984–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Veneziani A. Estimation of cardiac conductivities in ventricular tissue by a variational approach. Inverse Probl. 2015;31(11):115001.
   Google Scholar
• Beretta E, Cavaterra C, Cerutti MC, et al. An inverse problem for a semilinear parabolic equation arising from cardiac electrophysiology. Inverse Probl. 2017;33(10). 105008.
   Google Scholar
• Abidi Y, Bellassoued M, Mahjoub M, et al. On the identification of multiple space dependent ionic parameters in cardiac electrophysiology modelling. Inverse Probl. 2018;34(3):035005.
   Google Scholar
• Veneroni M. Reaction-diffusion systems for the microscopic cellular model of the cardiac electric field. Methods in the Applied Sciences¡/DIFdel¿Math Methods Appl Sci. 2006;29(14):1631–1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneroni M. Reaction-diffusion systems for the macroscopic bidomain model of the cardiac electric field. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2009;10:849–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleman T. Sur un problème d'unicité pour les systèmes d'équations aux dérivées partielles à deux variables indépendantes. Ark. Mat. Astronom. Fys. 1939;2B(17):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bugheim AL, Klibanov MV. Global uniqueness of class of multidimensional inverse problems. Soviet math. dokl. 1981;24:244–247.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV. Carleman estimates for global uniqueness, stability and numerical methods for coefficient inverse problems. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 2013;21:477–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV. A class of inverse problems for nonlinear parabolic equations. Sib Math J. 1986;27(5):698–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV. On a class of inverse problems. Doklady akademii nauk. Russian Academy of Sciences. 1982;265:1306–1309.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV. Uniqueness in the large of solutions of inverse problems for a class of differential equations. Differ Equ. 1985;21:1390–1395.
   Google Scholar
• Imanuvilov OY, Yamamoto M. Lipschitz stability in inverse parabolic problems by the Carleman estimate. Inverse Probl. 1998;14(5):1229–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellassoued M. Global logarithmic stability in inverse hyperbolic problem by arbitrary boundary observation. Inverse Probl. 2004;20(4):1033–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellassoued M. Uniqueness and stability in determining the speed of propagation of second-order hyperbolic equation with variable coefficients. Appl Anal. 2004;83(10):983–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Bellassoued M, Yamamoto M. Logarithmic stability in determination of a coefficient in an acoustic equation by arbitrary boundary observation. J mathématiques pures et appliquées. 2006;85(2):193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellassoued M, Yamamoto M. Determination of a coefficient in the wave equation with a single measurement. Appl Anal. 2008;87(8):901–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabdallah A, Cristofol M, Gaitan P, et al. Inverse problem for a parabolic system with two components by measurements of one component. Appl Anal. 2009;88(5):683–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukhgem AL. Introduction to the theory of inverse problems. VSP,Utrecht. The Netherlands: Walter de Gruyter; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bukhgeim AL, Cheng J, Isakov V, et al. Uniqueness in determining damping coefficients in hyperbolic equations. In: S. Saitoh, N. Hayashi , M. Yamamoto, editors. Analytic Extension Formulas and their Applications. Springer, Boston, MA. Vol. 9 2001. p. 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Benabdallah A, Gaitan P, Le Rousseau J. Stability of discontinuous diffusion coefficients and initial conditions in an inverse problem for the heat equation. SIAM J Control Optim. 2007;46(5):1849–1881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudouin L, Cerpa E, Crépeau E, et al. Lipschitz stability in an inverse problem for the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation. Appl Anal. 2013;92(10):2084–2102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzone PC, Pavarino LF. A parallel solver for reaction–diffusion systems in computational electrocardiology. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2004;14(06):883–911.
   Google Scholar
• Neu JC, Krassowska W. Homogenization of syncytial tissues. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1993;21(2):137–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keener JP, Sneyd J. Mathematical physiology. Vol. 1. New York: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tusscher KT, Hren R, Panfilov AV. Organization of ventricular fibrillation in the human heart. Circ Res. 2007;100(12):e87–e101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trayanova NA. Whole-heart modeling: applications to cardiac electrophysiology and electromechanics. Circ Res. 2011;108(1):113–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidi Y, Bellassoued M, Mahjoub M, et al. Ionic parameters identification of an inverse problem of strongly coupled pde's system in cardiac electrophysiology using Carleman estimates. Math Model Nat Phenom. 2019;14(2):202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassoued J, Mahjoub M, Zemzemi N. Stability results for the parameter identification inverse problem in cardiac electrophysiology. Inverse Probl. 2016;32(11):115002.
   Google Scholar
• Bendahmane M, Ainseba B, Yuan H. Stability of conductivities in an inverse problem in the reaction-diffusion system in electrocardiology. Am Inst Math Sci. 2015;10:369–385.
   Google Scholar
• Wu B, Yan L, Gao Y, et al. Carleman estimate for a linearized bidomain model in electrocardiology and its applications. Nonlinear Differ Equ Appl NoDEA. 2018;25(1):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fursikov AV, Imanuvilov OYu.. Exact controllability of the Naiver-stokes and Bossiness equations. Russian Math Surveys. 1999;54(3):565–618.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuilov OY. Controllability of parabolic equations. Sbornik Math. 1995;186(6):879–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doubova A, Osses A, Puel J-P. Exact controllability to trajectories for semilinear heat equations with discontinuous diffusion coefficients. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2002;8:621–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cara E, González-Burgos M, Guerrero S, et al. Null controllability of the heat equation with boundary Fourier conditions: the linear case. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2006;12(3):442–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar