A multi level linearized Crank–Nicolson scheme for Richards equation under variable flux boundary conditions

References

• Hillel D. Fundamentals of soil physics. San Diego, CA: Academic; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Celia MA, Bouloutas ET. A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation. Water Resour Res. 1990;26:1483–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverkamp R, Vauclin M. A note on estimating finite difference interblock hydraulic conductivity values for transient unsaturated flow problems. Water Resour Res. 1979;15:181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilding B. Qualitative mathematical analysis of the Richards equation. Trans Porous Med. 1991;6:651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez L, Vacca G. Spectral properties and conservation laws in mimetic finite difference methods for PDEs. J Comput Appl Math. 2016;292:760–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez L. A method for the numerical solution of a class of nonlinear diffusion equations. Rochy Mountain J Math. 1991;21:1083–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbridge P, Edwards MJE. Closed-form solutions for unsaturated flow under variable flux boundary conditions. Adv Water Resour. 1996;19:207–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbridge P, Triadis FHill JM. Infiltration from supply at constant water content: an integrable model. J Eng Math. 2009;64:193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbridge P, Daly E, Goard J. Exact solutions of the Richard equation with nonlinear plant-root extraction. Water Resour Res. 2017;53:9679–9691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbogast T, Wheeler MF, Zhang NY. A non-linear mixed finite element method for a degenerate parabolic equation arising in flow in porous media. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1996;33:1669–1687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bause M, Knabner P. Computation of variably saturated subsurface flow by adaptive mxied hybrid finite element methods. Adv Water Resour. 2004;27:565–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi M, Vurro M. The numerical solution of the Richards equation by means of the method of lines and ensemble Kalman filter. Math Comput Simul. 2016;125:38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop IS. Error estimates for a time discretization method for the Richards' equation. Comput Geosci. 2002;6:141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu F, Pop IS, Knabner P. Order of convergence estimates for an euler implicit, mixed finite element discretization of Richards' equation. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2004;42:1452–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radu FA, Pop IS, Knabner P. Mixed finite elements for the Richards equations: linearization procedure. J Comput Appl Math. 1999;168:365–373.
   Google Scholar
• Radu FA, Pop IS, Knabner P. Error estimates for a mixed finite element discretization of some degenerate parabolic equations. Numer Math. 2008;109:285–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eymard R, Gutnic M, Hilhorst D. The finite volume method for Richards equation. Comput Geosci. 1999;3:259–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eymard R, Hilhorst D, Vohralík M. A combined finite volume-nonconforming/mixed-hybrid finite element scheme for degenerate parabolic problems. Numer Math. 2006;105:73–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klausen RA, Radu FA, Eigestad GT. Convergence of MPFA on triangulations and for Richards' equation. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2008;58:1327–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu FN, Fukumoto Y, Zhao XP. A linearized finite difference scheme for the Richards equation under variable flux boundary conditions. J Sci Comput. 2020;83:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu FN, Fukumoto Y, Zhao XP. Stability analysis of the explicit difference scheme for Richards equation. Entropy. 2020;22:352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano N, Brunone B, Santini A. Numerical analysis of one-dimensional unsaturated flow in layered soils. Adv Water Resour. 1998;21:315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymkiewicz A, Helmig R. Comparison of conductivity averaging methods for one-dimensional unsaturated flow in layered soils. Adv Water Resour. 2011;34:112–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Petersson NA. Fourth order finite difference methods for the wave equation with mesh refinement interfaces. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2019;41:A3246–A3275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrick AW. Numerical approximations of Darcian flow through unsaturated soil. Water Resour Res. 1991;27:1215–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuraz M, Mayer P, Pech P. Solving the nonlinear Richards equation model with adaptive domain decomposition. J Comput Appl Math. 2014;270:2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List F, Radu FA. A study on iterative methods for solving Richards' equation. Comput Geosci. 2016;20:341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson G, Steffen KR, Sticko S, et al. High-order numerical methods for 2D parabolic problems in single and composite domains. J Sci Comput. 2018;76:812–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini G, Ferraris S. Mass-conservative finite volume methods on 2-D unstructured grids for the Richards equation. Adv Water Resour. 2004;27:1199–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian F, Gao L, Hu H. A two-dimensional Richards equation solver based on CVODE for variably saturated soil water movement. Sci China Tech Sci. 2011;54:3251–3264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng B, Wang J. Saturated-unsaturated groundwater modeling using 3D Richards equation with a coordinate transform of nonorthogonal grids. Appl Math Model. 2017;50:39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang KW, Howes FA. Nonlinear singular perturbation phenomena: theory and application. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Kevorkain J, Cole JD. Perturbation methods in applied mathematics. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1981.
   Google Scholar