A stationary unbiased finite sample ARCH-LM test procedure

References

• Bera, AK, and Higgins, ML, 1992. A test for conditional heteroscedasticity in time series models, Journal of Time Series Analysis 13 (1992), pp. 501–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bollerslev, T, 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31 (1986), pp. 307–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollerslev, T, and Wooldridge, JM, 1992. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances, Econometric Reviews 11 (1992), pp. 143–72.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, RD, Faff, RW, and Fry, TRL, 2001. GARCH modelling of individual stock data: the impact of censoring, firm size and trading volume, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 11 (2001), pp. 215–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F, and McAleer, M, 2003. Estimating smooth transition autoregressive models with GARCH errors in the presence of extreme observations and outliers, Applied Financial Economics 13 (2003), pp. 581–92.
   Google Scholar
• Diebold, F. X. (1987) Testing for serial correlation in the presence of ARCH, in Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 323–8..
   Google Scholar
• Diebold, FX, and Pauly, P, 1989. Small sample properties of asymptotically equivalent tests for autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Statistische Hefte 30 (1989), pp. 105–31.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, D, and Shukur, G, 1999. Testing autocorrelation in a system perspective, Econometric Reviews 18 (1999), pp. 343–86.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, RF, 1982. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation, Econometrica 50 (1982), pp. 987–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, RF, Hendry, DF, and Trumble, D, 1985. Small sample properties of ARCH estimators and tests, Canadian Journal of Economics 18 (1985), pp. 66–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franses, HF, Dijk, D, and Lucas, A, 2004. Short patches of outliers, ARCH and volatility modelling, Applied Financial Economics 14 (2004), pp. 221–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, GM, and Pacini, B, 1998. Early news is good news: the effects of market opening on market volatility, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 2 (1998), pp. 115–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourieroux, C, 1997. ARCH Models and Financial Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, AW, 1989. A nonparametric test for autoregressive conditional heterskedasticity: a Markov-chain approach, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7 (1989), pp. 107–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, D, 2006. Inflation and growth in South Africa, Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (2006), pp. 163–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y, and Shehadeh, RD, 1999. A new test for ARCH effects and its finite-sample performance, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 17 (1999), pp. 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadaş, E, and Öğünç, F, 2005. An analysis of inflation expectations of the Turkish private manufacturing industry, Statistics in Transition 7 (2005), pp. 365–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K, and Schmidt, P, 1993. Unit root tests with conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 59 (1993), pp. 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, O, 1996. Lumsdaine, R. and Jones, C. M. (1996), Public information and the persistence of bond market volatility, Working Paper No. 5446, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, JHH, 1991. A Lagrange multiplier test for GARCH models, Econometrics Letters 37 (1991), pp. 265–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, JHH, and King, ML, 1993. A locally most powerful based score test for ARCH and GARCH regression disturbances, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11 (1993), pp. 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, WK, Ling, S, and McAleer, M, 2003. Efficient estimation and testing for unit root processes with GARCH (1,1) errors: a Monte Carlo analysis, Econometric Reviews 22 (2003), pp. 179–202.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, R, Saikkonen, P, and Teräsvirta, T, 1988. Testing linearity in univariate time series models, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 15 (1988), pp. 161–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milhøj, A. (1985) The moment structure of ARCH processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 12, 281–92..
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, DB, 1991. Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach, Econometrica 59 (1991), pp. 347–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, PM, 1991. Testing for strong serial correlation and dynamic conditional heteroscedasticity in multiple regression, Journal of Econometrics 47 (1991), pp. 67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1984) Modelling Financial Time Series, Wiley, New York..
   Google Scholar
• Weymark, DN, 1999. Heteroscedastic exchange rates and time-varying optimal intervention rules, The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique 32 (1999), pp. 1174–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar