Revisiting purchasing power parity in Latin America: sequential panel selection method

References

• Apergis, N. (1998) Budget deficits and exchange rates: further evidence from cointegration and causality tests, Journal of Economic Studies, 25, 161–78.
   Google Scholar
• Arize, A. C., Malindretos, J. and Christoffersen, S. (2003) Monetary dynamics, exchange rates and parameter instability: an empirical investigation, Journal of Economic Studies, 30, 493–513.
   Google Scholar
• Baffoe-Bonnie, J. (2004) Dynamic modelling of fiscal and exchange rates policy effects in a developing country: a non-structural approach, Journal of Economic Studies, 31, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Hegerty, S. (2009) Purchasing power parity in less-developed and transition economies: a review article, Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 617–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2004) A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration, Econometrica, 72, 1127–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, E. D., Kruse, N. C. and Uri, N. D. (1993) The doctrine of relative purchasing power parity re-examined, Journal of Economic Studies, 20, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bleaney, M. (1992) Does long-run purchasing-power parity hold within the European monetary system?, Journal of Economic Studies, 19, 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, J. B., McNown, R. and Wallace, M. S. (2001) Misleading inferences from panel unit-root tests with an illustration from purchasing power parity, Review of International Economics, 9, 482–93.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. (2002) Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency, Journal of Econometrics, 110, 261–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chortareas, G. and Kapetanios, G. (2009) Getting PPP right: identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 390–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2004) Testing for a unit root with a nonlinear Fourier function, Working paper, Department of Economics, Finance & Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2009) The flexible Fourier form and testing for unit roots: an example of the term structure of interest rates, Working paper, Department of Economics, Finance & Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, C. (2000) Long-run PPP may not hold after all, Journal of International Economics, 51, 243−73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojman, D. E. (1989) Fundamental equilibrium exchange rates under contractionary devaluation: a Peruvian model, Journal of Economic Studies, 16, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. J. (2002) Exchange rate regimes and economic convergence in the European Union, Journal of Economic Studies, 29, 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, J. (2004) Eight conjectures about exchange rates, Journal of Economic Studies, 31, 524–48.
   Google Scholar
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. (1995) Forecasting of foreign exchange rate by normal mixture models, Journal of Economic Studies, 22, 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. and Snell, A. (2003) Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework, Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, S. and Lothgren, M. (2000) On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests, Economics Letters, 66, 249–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedijk, K. G., Tims, B. and van Dijk, Mathijs A. (2004) Purchasing power parity and the euro area, Journal of International Money and Finance, 23, 1081–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosa, I. A. (1994) Testing proportionality, symmetry and exclusiveness in long-run PPP, Journal of Economic Studies, 21, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, P. G. J. (1998) The overvaluation of purchasing power parity, Journal of International Economics, 44, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, K. (1996) The purchasing power parity puzzle, Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 647–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjolander, P. (2007) Unreal exchange rates: a simulation based approach to adjust misleading PPP estimates, Journal of Economic Studies, 34, 256–88.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. M. and Taylor, M. P. (2004) The purchasing power parity debate, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 135–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucar, N. and Omay, T. (2009) Testing for unit root in nonlinear heterogeneous panels, Economics Letters, 104, 5–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar