Did fiscal institutions affect Wagner’s law in Italy during 1951–2009 period? An empirical analysis

References

• Abdullah, H. and Maamor, S. (2010) Relationship between National Product and Malaysian Government development expenditure: Wagner’s law validity application, International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Abizadeh, S. and Gray, J. (1985) Wagner’s law: a pooled time-series cross-section comparison, National Tax Journal, 88, 209–18.
   Google Scholar
• Abizadeh, S. and Yousefi, M. (1988) An empirical reexamination of Wagner’s law, Economics Letters, 26, 169–73. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(88)90035-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal, M. and Abbas, Q. (2010) Wagner’s law in Pakistan: another look, Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2, 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan, M., Kwan, A. and Sahni, B. S. (1996) Cointegration and Wagner’s hypothesis: time series evidence for Canada, Applied Economics, 28, 1055–58. doi:10.1080/000368496328182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpaia, A. and Turrini, A. (2008) Government expenditure and economic growth in the EU: long-run tendencies and short-run adjustment, Economic Papers 300, European Commission and CEPR.
   Google Scholar
• Babatunde, M. A. (2011) A bound testing analysis of Wagner’s law in Nigeria: 1970–2006. Applied Economics, 43, 2843–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bairam, E. I. (1995) Level of aggregation, variable elasticity, and Wagner’s law, Economics Letters, 48, 341–44. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(94)00628-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barra, C., Bimonte, G. and Spennati, P. (2014) Governance and efficiency of fiscal institutions, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chimobi, O. P. (2009) Government expenditure and national income: a causality test for Nigeria, European Journal of Economics and Political Studies, 2, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, Y.-F., Cotsomitis, J. A. and Kwan, A. C. C. (2002) Multivariate cointegration and causality tests of Wagner’s hypothesis: evidence from the UK, Applied Economics, 34, 1671–77. doi:10.1080/00036840110115659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979) Distributions of the estimators for autoregressive time-series with a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doornik, J. A. and Hansen, H. (2008) An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927–39. doi:10.1111/obes.2008.70.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin, J. and Watson, G. S. (1951a) Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, I, Biometrika, 37, 409–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin, J. and Watson, G. S. (1951b) Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, II, Biometrika, 38, 159–78. doi:10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, 55, 251–76. doi:10.2307/1913236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florio, M. and Colautti, S. (2005) A logistic growth theory of public expenditures: a study of five countries over 100 years, Public Choice, 122, 355–93. doi:10.1007/s11127-005-3900-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, V. P. (1971) Wagner’s law of public expenditure: do recent cross-studies confirm it?, Public Finance, 26, 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ganti, S. and Kollury, B. R. (1979) Wagner’s law of public expenditure: some efficient results for the United States, Public Finance, 34, 223–33.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, I. J. (1968) On the empirical testing of Wagner’s law: a technical note, Public Finance, 23, 359–64.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J. (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, Econometric Society, 37, 424–38. doi:10.2307/1912791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J. (1980) Testing for causality, Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, 4, 161–94.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J. (1981) Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification, Journal of Econometrics, 16, 121–30. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90079-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. and Hansen, B. (1996) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts, Journal of Econometrics, 70, 99–126. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. P. (1967) Public expenditure and economic growth: a time series analysis, Public Finance, 22, 423–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B. (1992) Efficient estimation and testing of cointegrating vectors in the presence of deterministic trends, Journal of Econometrics, 53, 87–121. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90081-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M. (1993) Wagner’s law: a spurious relationship?, Public Finance, 48, 406–15.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-J. (2006) Government expenditures in China and Taiwan: do they follow Wagner’s law?, Journal of Economic Development, 31, 139–48.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, A. M. (2001) Wagner’s law revisited: cointegration and exogeneity tests for the USA, Applied Economics Letters, 8, 509–15. doi:10.1080/13504850010018743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kolluri, B. R., Panik, M. J. and Wahab, M. S. (2000) Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries, Applied Economics, 32, 1059–68. doi:10.1080/000368400322110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Webber, D. J. and Fargher, S. (2009) Wagner’s law revisited: cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand, University of the West of England Discussion Papers, 0917.
   Google Scholar
• Magazzino, C. (2010) Wagner’s law in Italy: empirical evidence from 1960 to 2008, Global and Local Economic Review, 2, 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Magazzino, C. (2012a) The nexus between disaggregated public spending and GDP in the Euro area, Economics Bulletin, 32, 2560–79.
   Google Scholar
• Magazzino, C. (2012b) Wagner versus Keynes: public spending and national income in Italy, Journal of Policy Modeling, 34, 890–905. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, A. J. (1980) Wagner’s law: an econometric test for Mexico, 1925–76, National Tax Journal, 33, 189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michas, N. A. (1975) Wagner’s law of public expenditure: what is the appropriate measurement for a valid test?, Public Finance, 30, 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1969) Fiscal Systems, Yale University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, P. K., Nielsen, I. and Smyth, R. (2008) Panel data, cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: empirical evidence from Chinese provinces, China Economic Review, 19, 297–307. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, L. (1994) Cointegration Causality and Wagner’s law: a test for Britain 1870–1913, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41, 286–98. doi:10.1111/sjpe.1994.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, A. T. and Wiseman, J. (1961) The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, Cambridge, Princeton University Press, NBER and Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, A. T. and Wiseman, J. (1967) The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, New, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. J. (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, R. (1987) Wagner’s hypothesis in time-series and cross-section perspectives: evidence from “real” data for 115 countries, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 194–204. doi:10.2307/1927226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideris, D. (2007) Wagner’s law in 19th century Greece: a cointegration and causality analysis, Bank of Greece Working Papers, 64, Bank of Greece Printing Works, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, J. (1999) Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th century Europe, Applied Economics Letters, 6, 413–16. doi:10.1080/135048599352916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasudeva Murthy, N. R. (1993) Further evidence of Wagner’s law for Mexico: an application of cointegration analysis, Public Finance, 48, 92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. H. (1883) Finanzwissenschaft, C. F. Winter, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. H. (1912) Les Fondements De L’economie Politique, Girard & Brière, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Yay, T. and Tastan, H. (2009) Growth of public expenditures in Turkey during the 1950-2004 period: an econometric analysis, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4, 101–18.
   Google Scholar