Empirical research on the different innovation engine between China and US manufacturing using an improved method

References

• Acs, Z. J., and D. B. Audretsch. 1987. “Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 567–575. doi:10.2307/1935950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., and D. G. Audretsch. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., and D. B. Audretzsch. 1991. “Innovation and Size at the Firm Level.” Southern Economic Journal 37: 739–744.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt. 2005. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 2: 701–728.
   Google Scholar
• Broadberry, S., and N. Crafts. 2001. “Competition and Innovation in 1950’s Britain.” Business History 43: 97–118. doi:10.1080/713999207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, L. M. B. 2003. “R&D Completion When Firms Choose Variance.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12: 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., S. Jacobsson, M. Holménb, and A. Rickne. 2002. “Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues.” Research Policy 31: 233–245. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, N. S. 1987. Innovation and Market Structure: Lessons from the Computer and Semiconductor Industries. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Greiner, L. E. 1972. “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow.” Harvard Business Review 50: 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberg, D. 1966. R&D: Essays on the Economics of Research and Development. New York: Random house.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. M., and K. B. Clark. 1990. “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30. doi:10.2307/2393549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. L., T. Loughran, and N. E. Savin. 2000. “The Disappearing Size Effect.” Research in Economics 54: 83–100. doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0207.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. H., H. Bai, X. Guan, and Y. Xiaoyun. 2004. “R&D Performance in Chinese Industry.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 4/5: 345–366.
   Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I. and N. L. Schwartz. 1981. Dynamic Optimization. New York: Elsevier North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. 1996. “Entry, Exit, Growth and Innovation Over the Product Life Cycle.” American Economic Review 86: 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. and Klsimons. 1996. “Innovation and Industry Shakeouts.” Business and Economic History 25: 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S., and K. L. Simons. 2005. “Industry Shakeouts and Technological Change.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 23: 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liangmou, G. 2006. “Auxiliary Innovation: A New Angle of View to Research the Relationship of Technological Innovation and Scale of Enterprise: The Dynamic Explanation and Empirical Study to the Climax of the Reversed U.” Research on Financial and Economic 11: 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, P. D., and V. Lin. 1977. “Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry--A Specification Error Approach.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 26: 45–51. doi:10.2307/2098329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1984. “Industrial innovation in Japan and the United States.” Science 4874: 1769–1774.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, J. W. 1965. “Market Structure, Business Conduct and Innovation.” American Economic Review 5: 323–324.
   Google Scholar
• Nie, H., T. Songtao, and W. Yufeng. 2008. “Innovation, Firm Size and Market Competition: From the Evidence of Firm Level Panel Data in China.” The Journal of World Economy 7: 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pingfang, Z., and Z. Xianzhi. 2007. “Quantile Regression of Scale Effect between Input Intensity of Firm’s Innovation Employee and Size of Firm’s Employee.” The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics 3: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G. P., and S. C. Wheelwrigh. 1995. “High-Tech R&D.” Harvard Business Review 9–10: 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Sapienza, A. M. 1989. “R&D Collaboration as a Global Competitive Tactic-Biotechnology and Ethical Pharmaceutical Industry.” R&D Management 19: 285–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1989.tb00652.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schere, F. M. 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston, MA: Houghton Mofflin.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1965. “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity and the Output of Patented Inventions.” American Economic Review 55: 1097–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1984. Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L. L. G. 1979. “Firm Size and Innovation Activity.” European Economic Review 12: 319–340. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(79)90024-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. 1977. “Asymptotics for and Against Cross-Validation.” Biometrika 64: 29–35. doi:10.1093/biomet/64.1.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, F. F., and J. M. Utterback. 1995. “Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms.” Strategic Management Journal 16: 415–430. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M., and F. F. Suárez. 1993. “Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure.” Research Policy 22: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijaya Bhaskar, M. 1991. Concentration in Indian Manufacturing Industry, 1970 to 1990. Trivandrum: Centre for Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, J. S. 1961. “Industrial Research and the New Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 69: 183–186. doi:10.1086/jpe.1961.69.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda, T. 2005. “Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing.” Small Business Economics Feb 24: 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-7568-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar