Spatial fiscal interactions among French municipalities within inter-municipal groups

References

• Agrawal, D. R. 2015. “The Tax Gradient: Spatial Aspects of Fiscal Competition.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7 (2): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baicker, K. 2005. “The Spillover Effects of State Spending.” Journal of Public Economics 89(2-3): 529–544. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, T. 2014. “Identifying Local Tax Mimicking With Administrative Borders And A Policy Reform.” 118: 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.011.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, T. C., and R. P. Goodman. 1973. “Private Demands For Public Goods.” The American Economic Review 63 (3): 280-296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T., and A. Case. 1995. “Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition.” The American Economic Review 85 (1): 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and Y. M. Ioannides. 2011. “Identification of Social Interactions.” In Handbook of Social Economics, eds. J. Benhabib, A. Bisin and M.O. Jackson, North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Borcherding, T. E., and R. T. Deacon. 1972. “The Demand For The Services Of Non-federal Governments.” The American Economic Review 62 (5): 891-901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boskin, M. J. 1973. “Local Government Tax and Product Competition and the Optimal Provision of Public Goods.” The Journal of Political Economy 81 (1): 203–210. doi:10.1086/260017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boskin, M. J. 2012. “Do Peers Affect Student Achievement? Evidence from Canada Using Group Size Variation.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 29 (1): 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramoullé, Y., H. Djebarri, and B. Fortin. 2009. “Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks.” Journal of Econometrics 150: 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, C., and J. Pinkse. 2000. “The Determinants of Municipal Tax Rates in British Columbia.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’economique 33 (3): 695–714. doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuillé, M.-L., and S. Zanaj. 2013. “Mergers in Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Public Economics 105: 11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, W. A., and S. N. Durlauf. 2001. “Interactions-Based Models.” In Handbook of Econometrics, eds J.J. Heckman and E. Leamer, North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. 2003. “Strategic Interaction among Governments: An Overview of Empirical Studies.” International Regional Science Review 26 (2): 175–188. doi:10.1177/0160017602250974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K., and L. A. Saavedra. 2001. “Do Local Governments Engage in Strategic Property–Tax Competition?” National Tax Journal 54 (2): 203–230. doi:10.17310/ntj.2001.2.00.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buettner, T. 2001. “Local Business Taxation and Competition for Capital: The Choice of the Tax Rate.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 31(2-3): 215–245. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00041-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, A. C., H. S. Rosen, and J. R. Hines. 1993. “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States.” Journal of Public Economics 52 (3): 285–307. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90036-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirinko, R and D. Wilson. 2013. Tax Competition among US States: Racing to the Bottom or Riding on a Seesaw?, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp08-03bk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, W. N., W. E. Oates, and R. M. Schwab. 1992. “Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (5): 966–991. doi:10.1086/261848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, L. P., J.-M. Josselin, and Y. Rocaboy. 2002. “Le Mimétisme Fiscal: Une Application Aux Régions Françaises.” Economie & Prévision 156 (5): 43–49. doi:10.3406/ecop.2002.6880.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, L. P., and G. Kirchgässner. 2001. “Income Tax Competition at the State and Local Level in Switzerland.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 31 (2): 181–213. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00084-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., T. Madies, and S. Paty. 2008. “Public Spending Interactions and Local Politics. Empirical Evidence from French Municipalities.” Public Choice 137 (1–2): 57–80. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9312-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyndels, B., and J. Vuchelen. 1998. “Tax Mimicking among Belgian Municipalities.” National Tax Journal 51 (1): 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., and A. E. van Montfort. 2009. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. O., and X. Vives. 2010. “Social Networks and Peer Effects: An Introduction.” Journal of the European Economic Association 8 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1162/jeea.2010.8.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayet, H., S. Paty, and A. Pentel. 2002. “Existe-T-Il Des Interactions Fiscales Stratégiques Entre Les Collectivités Locales.” Economie & Prévision 154 (3): 95–105. doi:10.3406/ecop.2002.6388.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, M., and M. Marchand. 1997. “Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending.” Journal of Public Economics 66 (1): 33–53. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00035-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. 1992. “Mimicking of Local Tax Burdens among Neighboring Counties.” Public Finance Review 20 (4): 450–467. doi:10.1177/109114219202000404.
   Google Scholar
• Le Sage, J., and R. Pace. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F. 2007. “Identification and Estimation of Econometric Models with Group Interactions, Contextual Factors and Fixed Effects.” Journal of Econometrics 140 (2): 333–374. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F., X. Liu, and X. Lin. 2010. “Specification and Estimation of Social Interaction Models with Network Structures.” The Econometrics Journal 13 (2): 145–176. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1368-423X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprince, M., T. Madiès, and S. Paty. 2007. “Business Tax Interactions among Local Governments: An Empirical Analysis of the French Case.” Journal of Regional Science 47 (3): 603–621. doi:10.1111/jors.2007.47.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprince, M., S. Paty, and E. Reulier. 2005. “Choix D’imposition Et Interactions Spatiales Entre Collectivités Locales.” Recherches Économiques De Louvain 71 (1): 67–93. doi:10.3917/rel.711.067.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X. 2010. “Identifying Peer Effects in Student Academic Achievement by Spatial Autoregressive Models with Group Unobservables.” Journal of Labor Economics 28 (4): 825–860. doi:10.1086/653506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, J. 2006. “Spatial Interaction Model of Spillovers from Locally Provided Public Services.” Regional Studies 40 (6): 631–644. doi:10.1080/00343400600868788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytikainen, T. 2012. “Tax Competition Among Local Governments: Evidence From A Property Tax Reform In Finland.” Journal of Public Economics 96 (7): 584–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” The Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): 531–542. doi:10.2307/2298123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Panizza, U. 1999. “On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 74: 97–139. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, M. V. 1970. “Optimality, ‘Public’ Goods, and Local Governments: A General Theoretical Analysis.” The Journal of Political Economy 78 (3): 572–585. doi:10.1086/259651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelli, F. 2001. “Spatial Patterns in Local Taxation: Tax Mimicking or Error Mimicking?” Applied Economics 33 (9): 1101–1107. doi:10.1080/00036840010007164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelli, F. 2012. “Geografiscal Federalism.” In Handbook of Multilevel Finance, eds E. Ahmad and G. Brosio. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S. G. 2001. “Tiebout Sorting, Aggregation and the Estimation of Peer Group Effects.” Economics of Education Review 20 (3): 201–209. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00032-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. 1987. “Decentralization as an Incentive Scheme.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 3 (2): 24–43. doi:10.1093/oxrep/3.2.24.
   Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A. 2006. “Expenditure Spillovers and Fiscal Interactions: Empirical Evidence from Local Governments in Spain.” Journal of Urban Economics 59 (1): 32–53. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2005.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. 1966. “The Optimal Provision of Public Goods in a System of Local Government.” The Journal of Political Economy 74 (1): 18–33. doi:10.1086/259106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. D. 1986. “A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition.” Journal of Urban Economics 19 (3): 296–315. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(86)90045-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrede, M. 1997. “Tax Competition and Federalism: The Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” Finanz-Archiv : Zeitschrift Fur Das Gesamte Finanzwesen 54 (4): 494–515.
   Google Scholar
• Zodrow, G. R., and P. Mieszkowski. 1986. “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” Journal of Urban Economics 19 (3): 356–370. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(86)90048-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar