Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies

References

• Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, and F. Zilibotti. 2006. “Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth.” Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 37–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, A. E. 1985. “Creativity and Regional Development.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 56 (1): 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M., and K. Pavitt. 1993. “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries.” Industrial and Corporate Change 2: 157–210.
   Google Scholar
• Benavente, J. 2006. “The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15: 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., and M. Costa Dias. 2002. “Alternative Approaches to Evaluation in Empirical Microeconomics.” Portuguese Economic Journal 1: 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., L. Dearden, C. Meghir, and B. Sianesi. 1999. “Human Capital Investment: The Returns from Education and Training to the Individual, the Firm and the Economy.” Fiscal Studies 20: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39: 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, G. 2012. “Effect of Firm Resources & External Environment on Innovation Decisions.” School of Economics Working Paper Series. Cork: University College Cork.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, G., and J. Doran 2012. “Post Socialist Path Dependence in the Innovation Performance of Previously State Owned Russian Firms.” School of Economics Working Paper Series. Cork: University College Cork.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. R. 2010. “Service Innovation and Manufacturing Innovation: Bundling and Blending Services and Products in Hybrid Production Systems to Produce Hybrid Products.” In Handbook on Innovation in Services, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 679–700.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnovsky, D., A. López, and G. Pupato. 2006. “Innovation and Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992–2001).” Research Policy 35: 266–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepon, B., E. Duguet, and J. Mairessec. 1998. “Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7: 115–158.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., and A. Rodriguez-Pose. 2011. Innovation and Regional Growth in the European Union. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, F., and P. McCann. 2015. “Innovation and Productivity in Irish Firms.” Spatial Economic Analysis 10: 181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, F. 2017. “Product and service innovation and discontinuation in manufacturing and service firms in Europe.” European Journal of Innovation Management 20: 250–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., Č. Kostevc, and M. Rojec. 2011. Innovation and Firms’ Productivity Growth in Slovenia: Sensitivity of Results to Sectoral Heterogeneity and to Estimation Method, 165–193. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Di Falco, S., M. Veronesi, and M. Yesuf. 2011. “Does Adaptation to Climate Change Provide Food Security? A Micro-Perspective from Ethiopia.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93: 829–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, J., and E. O’leary. 2011. “External Interaction, Innovation and Productivity: An Application of the Innovation Value Chain to Ireland.” Spatial Economic Analysis 6: 199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguet, E. 2006. “Innovation Height, Spillovers and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence from French Manufacturing.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15: 415–442.
   Google Scholar
• Dutoit, L. C. 2007. Heckman’s Selection Model, Endogenous and Exogenous Switching Models, A Survey. Lausanne: University of Lausanne
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. European Innovation Scoreboard 2008 — Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance Brussels. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R. 2000. “Sectoral Patterns Of Technological Change In Services.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9: 183–222.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freel, M. 2003. “Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity.” Research Policy 32: 751–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. 1998. “Are Cities Dying?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12: 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, N. R., and P. Mccann. 2005. “Innovation, Agglomeration, and Regional Development.” Journal of Economic Geography 5 (5): 523–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2008. “Innovation and Productivity across Four European Countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22: 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1998. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., F. Lotti, and J. Mairesse. 2009. “Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence for Italy.” Small Business Economics 33: 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. T., and J. Birkinshaw. 2007. “The Innovation Value Chain.” Harvard Business Review 85: 121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., and J. Moffat. 2012. “Is Productivity Highher in British Cities?*.” Journal of Regional Science 52: 762–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. 2012. “Choosing Races and Placing Bets: UK National Innovation Policy and the Globalisation of Innovation Systems.” In The UK in a Global World, 37. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. ISBN: 978-1-907142-55-0
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. 2000. Transition Economies: An IMF Perspective on Progress and Prospects International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/110300.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1986. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value.” The American Economic Review 76: 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janz, N., H. Lööf, and B. Peters. 2004. “Firm Level Innovation and Productivity–Is There a Common Story across Countries.” Problems and Perspectives in Management 2: 184–204.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1995. Development. Cambridge: Geography and Economic Theory MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-S., and H.-G. Jeong. 2006. “The Determinants of Economic Growth of Transition Economies: Economic Reform versus Initial Conditions.” International Economic Journal 20: 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Lokshin, M., and Z. Sajaia. 2004. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Endogenous Switching Regression Models.” Stata Journal 4: 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., and A. Heshmati. 2006. “On the Relationship between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15: 317–344.
   Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics.  257–91. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., P. Mohnen, and E. Kremp. 2005. “The Importance of R&D and Innovation for Productivity: A Reexamination in Light of the French Innovation Survey.” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique. Contributions in memory of Zvi Griliches. 79/80: 487–527.
   Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., and S. Robin 2009.” Innovation and Productivity: A Firm-Level Analysis for French Manufacturing and Services Using CIS3 and CIS4 Data (1998-2000 and 2002-2004).” working paper. Paris: CREST-ENSAE
   Google Scholar
• Mañez, J. A., M. E. Rochina-Barrachina, A. Sanchis, and J. A. Sanchis. 2013. “Do Process Innovations Boost SMEs Productivity Growth?” Empirical Economics 44 (3): 1373–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masso, J., and P. Vahter. 2008. “Technological Innovation and Productivity in Late-Transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys.” The European Journal of Development Research 20: 240–261.
   Google Scholar
• Mccann, P. 2007. “Sketching Out a Model of Innovation, Face-To-Face Interaction and Economic Geography.” Spatial Economic Analysis 2: 117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Mccann, P., and R. Ortega-Argilés. 2013. “Modern Regional Innovation Policy.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6: 187–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccann, P., and D. Shefer. 2005. “Agglomeration, Economic Geography and Regional Growth.” Papers in Regional Science 84: 301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S., and I. Miles. 2000. “Introduction, Overview, and Reprise.” In Innovation Systems in the Service Economy. Measurement and Case Study Analysis, edited by J. S. Metcalfe and I. Miles, 1–14. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, P., and M. Selowsky. 2002. The First Ten Years. Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development,The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P., and B. H. Hall. 2013. “Innovation and Productivity: An Update.” Eurasian Business Review 3. 3(1):  47–65
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. 2012. The New Geography of Jobs. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Third Edition. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Regions and Innovation Policy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Growth and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. OECD Factbook: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. Paris: Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, C., M. Landabaso, and K. Morgan. 2002. “The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy.” Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, M. L., F. Schiantarelli, and A. Sembenelli. 2006. “Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy.” European Economic Review 50: 2037–2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. 1984. “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.” Research Policy 13: 343–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., and L. Auriol. 1999. “Patterns of Restructuring in Research, Development and Innovation Activities in Central and Eastern European Countries: An Analysis Based on S&T Indicators.” Research Policy 28: 351–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffo, J., S. Lhuillery, and L. Miotti. 2008. “Northern and Southern Innovativity: A Comparison across European and Latin American Countries.” The European Journal of Development Research 20: 219–239.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. 2001. “Is R&D Investment in Leading Areas of Europe Worthwhile? Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Papers in Regional Science 80: 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S. 2009. “Innovation in Transition: A comparison of the innovation potential of incumbent firms and innovative start-ups in the Western Balkans CSME Working Paper.” Coventry: Warwick Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, S., J. Du, and J. H. Love. 2008. “Modelling the Innovation Value Chain.” Research Policy 37: 961–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K., and T. Kostova. 2003. “Organizational Coping with Institutional Upheaval in Transition Economies.” Journal of World Business 38: 314–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T., and C. Rammer. 2007. “Non-Technological and Technological Innovation: Strange Bedfellows?” ZEW -Centre for European Economics. https;//ub-madec.bib.uni-mannheim.de/1624/1/dp07025.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Vol. 55. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K., X. Sala-I-Martin, J. Blanke, M. D. Hanouz, I. Mia, and T. Geiger 2009. Published. The global competitiveness report 2009–2010. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Seker, M. (2009). Importing, Exporting and Innovation in Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and A. J. Venables. 2004. “Buzz: Face-To-Face Contact and the Urban Economy.” Journal of Economic Geography 4: 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. 1998. “Small and Large Firms: Sources of Unequal Innovations?” Research Policy 27: 725–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tether, B. S. 2005. “Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey.” Industry and Innovation 12: 153–184.
   Google Scholar
• Trigo, A. 2013. “The Nature of Innovation in R&D- and Non-R&D-Intensive Service Firms: Evidence from Firm-Level Latent Class Analysis.” Industry and Innovation 20: 48–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, G., and L. Klomp. 2006. “On the Contribution of Innovation to Multi-Factor Productivity Growth.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15: 367–390.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. 1966. “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 190–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar