A rank-dependent utility approach to model intra- and inter-individual heterogeneity in risky choice behaviours

References

• Allais, M. 1953. “La psychologie de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: la théorie et l’expérience.” Journal De La Société De Statistique De Paris 94: 47–73.
   Google Scholar
• Batarce, M., and M. Ivaldi. 2014. “Urban Travel Demand Model with Endogenous Congestion.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 59: 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, J., J. Polak, P. Jones, and A. Cook. 2001. “The Valuation of Reliability for Personal Travel.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 37 (2–3): 191–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, and K. D. Vohs. 2001. “Bad is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5 (4): 323.
   Google Scholar
• Beaud, M., T. Blayac, and M. Stéphan. 2016. “The Impact of Travel Time Variability and Travelers’ Risk Attitudes on the Values of Time and Reliability.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 93: 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., and J. Swait. 1986. “The Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index.” Transportation Science 20 (2): 133–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., and R. Sardesai. 2006. “The Impact of Stop-making and Travel Time Reliability on Commute Mode Choice.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40 (9): 709–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M. 2016. Pythonbiogeme: A Short Introduction. Technical report. Transp-OR, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, M., J. Eliasson, and J. P. Franklin. 2012. “Valuations of Travel Time Variability in Scheduling versus Mean–Variance Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46 (7): 855–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouscasse, H. 2017. “Essays on Travel Mode Choice Modeling - A Discrete Choice Approach to the Interactions.” PhD thesis. PhD Thesis. University of Lyon (France).
   Google Scholar
• Bouscasse, H., and M. de Lapparent. 2019. “Perceived Comfort and Values of Travel Time Savings in the Rhône-alpes Region.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124: 370–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. 2015. “Risk Perception, Risk Attitude, and Decision: A Rank-dependent Analysis.” Mathematical Population Studies 22 (1): 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lapparent, M., and M. Ben-Akiva. 2014. “Risk Aversion in Travel Mode Choice with Rank-dependent Utility.” Mathematical Population Studies 21 (4): 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Palma, A., M. Ben-Akiva, D. Brownstone, C. Holt, T. Magnac, D. McFadden, P. Moffatt, et al. 2008. “Risk, Uncertainty and Discrete Choice Models.” Marketing Letters 19 (3–4): 269–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Palma, A., and N. Picard. 2005. “Route Choice Decision under Travel Time Uncertainty.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39 (4): 295–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Palma, A., N. Picard, and M. de Lapparent. 2015. “Risk and Uncertainty in Urban and Transport Economics.” Mathematical Population Studies 22 (1): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denant-Boèmont, L., and O. L’Haridon. 2013. “La rationalité à l’ épreuve de l’ économie comporte-mentale.” Revue française d’économie 28 (2): 35–89.
   Google Scholar
• Diecidue, E., and P. P. Wakker. 2001. “On the Intuition of Rank-dependent Utility.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23 (3): 281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. R., and A. Tversky. 1995. “Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 585–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., and D. A. Hensher. 2003. “A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 37 (8): 681–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., J. Rose, and W. Greene. 2015. Applied Choice Analysis. Number 1188. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., W. H. Greene, and Z. Li. 2011. “Embedding Risk Attitude and Decision Weights in Non-linear Logit to Accommodate Time Variability in the Value of Expected Travel Time Savings.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45 (7): 954–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and Z. Li. 2012. “Valuing Travel Time Variability within a Rank-dependent Utility Framework and an Investigation of Unobserved Taste Heterogeneity.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 46 (2): 293–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, K., and M. Fosgerau. 2012. “Using Prospect Theory to Investigate the Low Marginal Value of Travel Time for Small Time Changes.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46 (8): 917–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., and S. K Laury. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” ” American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–1655. doi:10.1257/000282802762024700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jou, R.-C., and K.-H. Chen. 2013. “An Application of Cumulative Prospect Theory to Freeway Drivers’ Route Choice Behaviours.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 49: 123–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47: 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemel, E., and C. Paraschiv. 2013. “Prospect Theory for Joint Time and Money Consequences in Risk and Ambiguity.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 56: 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, A., and K. W. Axhausen. 2002. “The Reliability of the Transportation System and Its Influence on the Choice Behaviour.” Swiss transport research conference (strc), Monte verità/Ascona.
   Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., and A. L. Robb. 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 715–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and D. Hensher. 2011. “Prospect Theoretic Contributions in Understanding Traveller Behaviour: A Review and Some Comments.” Transport Reviews 31 (1): 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazar, N., B. Koszegi, and D. Ariely. 2014. “True Context-dependent Preferences? the Causes of Market-dependent Valuations.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 27 (3): 200–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmier, P. 2010. Mode d’emploi - musliw - logiciel de calcul d’accessibilité multimodal. Technical report. CETE Nord-Picardie.
   Google Scholar
• Prelec, D. 1998. “The Probability Weighting Function.” Econometrica 66: 497–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiggin, J. 1982. “A Theory of Anticipated Utility.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4): 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinet, E. 2014. L’évaluation socioéconomique des investissements publics. Technical Report, Commissariat général à la stratégie et à la prospective.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. Timmermans. 2014. “Applications of Theories and Models of Choice and Decision-making under Conditions of Uncertainty in Travel Behavior Research.” Travel Behaviour and Society 1 (3): 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razo, M., and S. Gao. 2013. “A Rank-dependent Expected Utility Model for Strategic Route Choice with Stated Preference Data.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 27: 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., and M. C. Bliemer. 2007. “Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies.” In Handbook of Transport Modelling, 2nd ed., 151–180. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Senbil, M., and R. Kitamura. 2005. “Heterogeneity in Commuter Departure Time Decision: A Prospect Theoretic Approach.” In Applied Research in Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, 369–398. Fourth International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, 2003. Conference Location: College Park, MD, USA. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shires, J. D., and G. C. De Jong. 2009. “An International Meta-analysis of Values of Travel Time Savings.” Evaluation and Program Planning 32 (4): 315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., T. Arentze, and H. Timmermans. 2012. “A Heterogeneous Latent Class Model of Activity Rescheduling, Route Choice and Information Acquisition Decisions under Multiple Uncertain Events.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 25: 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H. 2010. “On the (Ir) Relevance of Prospect Theory in Modelling Uncertainty in Travel Decisions.” EJTIR 4 (10): 368–384.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and C. R. Fox. 1995. “Weighing Risk and Uncertainty.” Psychological Review 102 (2): 269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and I. Simonson. 1993. “Context-Dependent Preferences.” Management Science 39 (10): 1179–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., P. Chintakayala, G. de Jong, and D. Ferrer. 2012. European Wide Meta-Analysis of Values of Travel Time. Technical report. ITS, University of Leeds, Paper prepared for EIB.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, G., and R. Gonzalez. 1999. “Nonlinear Decision Weights in Choice under Uncertainty.” Management Science 45 (1): 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., and D. Fukuda. 2015. “On the Cost of Misperceived Travel Time Variability.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 75: 96–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaari, M. E. 1987. “The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 55: 95–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar