In search of effective altruists

References

• Adams, W. C. 1986. “Whose Lives Count? TV Coverage of Natural Disasters.” Journal of Communication 36 (2): 113–122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01429.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. 1989. “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence.” Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1447–1458. doi:10.1086/261662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. 1990. “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm Glow Giving.” Economic Journal 100: 464–477. doi:10.2307/2234133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. B., P. G. Backus, J. Micklewright, C. Pharoah, and S. V. Schnepf. 2012. “Charitable Giving for Overseas Development: UK Trends over a Quarter Century.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 175 (1): 167–190. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.01009.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., and P. Wiepking. 2011. “A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms that Drive Charitable Giving.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (5): 924–973. doi:10.1177/0899764010380927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, J. Z., A. Barasch, E. E. Levine, and D. A. Small. 2018. “Impediments to Effective Altruism: The Role of Subjective Preferences in Charitable Giving.” Psychological Science 29 (5): 834–844. doi:10.1177/0956797617747648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brañas-Garza, P. 2006. “Poverty in Dictator Games: Awakening Solidarity.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60: 306–320. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caelli, K., L. Ray, and J. Mill. 2003. “Clear as Mud: Toward Greater Clarity in Generic Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (2): 1–24. doi:10.1177/160940690300200201.
   Google Scholar
• Casale, D., and A. Baumann. 2015. “Who Gives to International Causes? A Sociodemographic Analysis of U.S. Donors.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44 (1): 98–122. doi:10.1177/0899764013507141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charities Aid Foundation. 2017. “World Giving Index.” https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/cafworldgivingindex2017_2167a_web_210917.pdf?sfvrsn=ed1dac40_10
   Google Scholar
• Charnysh, V., C. Lucas, and P. Singh. 2015. “The Ties that Bind: National Identity Salience and Pro-social Behavior toward the Ethnic Other.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (3): 267–300. doi:10.1177/0010414014543103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., A. Garces-Ozanne, and S. Knowles. 2017. “Emphasising the Problem or the Solution in Charitable Fundraising for International Development.” Journal of Development Studies 54: 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/00220388.2017.1308490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M., F. Stokes, and H. Dixon. 2015. Giving New Zealand: Philanthropic Funding 2014. Business and Economic Research Limited, prepared for Philanthropy New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, R. A., and D. Rowlands. 2019. “Giving It Away: Charitable Donations to Overseas Disasters.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Etang, A., D. Fielding, and S. Knowles. 2011. “Does Trust Extend beyond the Village? Experimental Trust and Social Distance in Cameroon.” Experimental Economics 14 (1): 15–35. doi:10.1007/s10683-010-9255-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallier, C., T. Goeschi, M. Kesternich, J. Lohse, C. Reif, and D. Römer. 2017. “Levelling up? An inter-neighbourhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision”, Centre for European Economic Research Working Paper, No. 17–012
   Google Scholar
• Give Well. 2020. Accessed 6 July 2020. https://www.givewell.org/giving101/Your-dollar-goes-further-overseas
   Google Scholar
• Giving USA Foundation. 2009. The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2009. Indianapolis: Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Grimson, D., S. Knowles, and P. Stahlmann-Brown. 2020. “How Close to Home Does Charity Begin.” Applied Economics 52 (34): 3700–3708. (forthcoming, available online first at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00036846.2020.1720906). doi:10.1080/00036846.2020.1720906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P., and F. Ombler. 2008. “A New Method for Scoring Multi-attribute Value Models Using Pairwise Rankings of Alternatives.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 15: 87–107. doi:10.1002/mcda.428.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P., N. Kergozou, S. Knowles, and P. Thorsnes. 2014. “Developing Countries in Need: Which Characteristics Appeal Most to People When Donating Money?” Journal of Development Studies 50: 1494–1509. doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.925542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzenstein, M., and S. S. Posavac. 2019. “When Charity Begins at Home: How Personal Financial Scarcity Drives Preferences for Donating Locally at the Expense of Global Concerns.” Journal of Economic Psychology 73: 123–135. forthcoming (available online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487018302824). doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and S. Frederick. 2002. “Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgement.” In Heuristics of Intuitive Judgement: Extensions and Applications, edited by T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 49-81.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar. Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, D., and D. H. Wood. 2017. “The Effect of Effectiveness: Donor Response to Aid Effectiveness in a Direct Mail Fundraising Experiment.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 66: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, S., and T. Sullivan. 2017. “Does Charity Begin at Home or Overseas.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 46: 944–962. doi:10.1177/0899764017703710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, M., and K. Thompson. 2004. “Identity, Place and Bystander Intervention: Social Categories and Helping after Natural Disasters.” The Journal of Social Psychology 144 (3): 229–245. doi:10.3200/SOCP.144.3.229-245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAskill, W. 2015. Doing Good Better: How Effective Altruism Can Help You Make a Difference. New York, New York: Gotham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, L., and I. Günther. 2018. “Making an Impact? the Relevance of Information on Aid Effectiveness for Charitable Giving. A Laboratory Experiment.” Journal of Development Economics 136: 18–33. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micklewright, J., and S. V. Schnepf. 2009. “Who Gives to Charitable Donations for Overseas Development?” Journal of Social Policy 38 (2): 317–341. doi:10.1017/S0047279408002869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan., S. S., G. H. Pink, and W. H. Dow. 2009. “Sociodemographic and Personality Characteristics of Canadian Donors Contributing to International Charity.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38 (3): 413–440. doi:10.1177/0899764008316056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schons, L. M., J. Cadogan, and T. Roumpini. 2017. “Should Charity Begin at Home? an Empirical Investigation of Consumers’ Responses to Companies’ Varying Geographic Allocations of Donation Budgets.” Journal of Business Ethics 144: 559–576. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2832-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 2015. The Most Good You Can Do. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. 1999. Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiepking, P. 2010. “Democrats Support International Relief and the Upper Class Donates to Art? How Opportunity, Incentives and Confidence Affect Donations to Different Types of Charitable Organizations.” Social Science Review 39 (6): 1073–1087.
   Google Scholar