Scale of operations of MNCs and heterogeneity: a multi-country analysis

References

• Alguacil, M., J. Martí, and V. Orts. 2017. “Firm Heterogeneity and the Market Scope of European Multinational Activity.” International Review of Economics & Finance 51: 645–659. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antràs, P., and S. R. Yeaple. 2014. “Multinational Firms and the Structure of International Trade.” Handbook of International Economics 4: 55–130.
   Google Scholar
• Aw, B., and Y. Lee. 2008. “Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Taiwanese Multinationals.” Journal of International Economics 76 (2): 403–415. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berden, K., J. H. Bergstrand, and E. Van Etten. 2014. “Governance and Globalization.” The World Economy 37 (3): 353–386. doi:10.1111/twec.12135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, Y., W. R. J. Alexander, and Z. Pei. 2019. “Factors Affecting Trade in Services: Evidence from Panel Data.” Applied Economics 51 (34): 3730–3739. doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1584379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, S. L. 1993. “A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with A Trade-off between Proximity and Concentration.” NBER Working Paper No. 4269.
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, S. L. 1997. “An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-concentration Trade-off between Multinational Sales and Trade.” American Economic Review 87 (4): 520–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics Methods and Applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani, D., and A. Zanfei. 2007. “Internationalisation, Innovation and Productivity: How Do Firms Differ in Italy?” The World Economy 30 (1): 156–176. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00875.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. X., and M. Moore. 2010. “Location Decision of Heterogeneous Multinational Firms.” Journal of International Economics 80 (2): 188–199. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damijan, J., C. Kostevc, and M. Rojec. 2016. “Not Every Kind of Outward FDI Increases Parent Firm Productivity: The Case of New EU Members.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 53 (I): 397–422.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, D., and V. Procher. 2012. “Export.” FDI and Firm Productivity, Applied Economics 44 (15): 1931–1940.
   Google Scholar
• Fariñas, J. C., A. Martín-Marcos, and F. J. Velázquez. 2018. “Multinational Activity of European Firms and Heterogeneity.” The World Economy 41-1 (5): 1166–1195. doi:10.1111/twec.12613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariñas, J. C., A. Martín-Marcos, and F. J. Velázquez. 2019. “Estimating the Scope Elasticity of Multinational Firms: An Empirical Assessment.” MPRA Paper No. 94990.
   Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R., R. Inklaar, and M. Timmer. 2015. “The Next Generation of the Penn World Tables.” American Economic Review 105(31): 3150–3182. available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garret, J. Z. 2016. “Explaining Asymmetries in Bilateral FDI Flows.” International Review of Economics & Finance 41: 155–171. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2015.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geishecker, I., H. Görg, and D. Taglioni. 2009. “Characterising Euro Area Multinationals.” The World Economy 32 (1): 49–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01157.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenaway, D., and R. Kneller. 2007. “Firm Heterogeneity, Exporting, and Foreign Direct Investment.” Economic Journal 117 (517): F134–F161. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02018.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161. doi:10.2307/1912352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein. 2008. “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXXXIII (2): 441–487. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and S. R. Yeaple. 2004. “Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms.” American Economic Review 94 (1): 300–316. doi:10.1257/000282804322970814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2010. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators Methodology and Analytical Issues.” Policy Research Working Paper 5430. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin. 2003. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables.” Review of Economic Studies 70 (2): 317–341. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, J. 2020. “Location Decisions of Heterogeneous European Firms.” Economics and Business Letters 9 (3): 265–269. doi:10.17811/ebl.9.3.2020.265-269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, T., I. Mejean, and B. Nefussi. 2010. “The Location of Domestic and Foreign Production Affiliates by French Multinational Firms.” Journal of Urban Economics 68 (2): 115–128. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2010.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, T., and S. Zignano. 2011. “Notes on CEPII´s Distance Measures: The GeoDist Database.” CEPII Working Paper, N°2011-25, December.
   Google Scholar
• Melitz, M. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71 (6): 1695–1725. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama, H., and M. Tamaguchi. 2013. “Technological Constraints, Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Multinational Firms.” Review of International Economics 21 (5): 996–1005. doi:10.1111/roie.12085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. OECD Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Petrin, A., and K. Train. 2010. “A Control Function Approach to Endogeneity in Consumer Choice Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramondo, N., A. Rodríguez-Clare, and F. Tintelnot. 2015. “Multinational Production: Data and Stylized Facts.” American Economic Review 105 (5): 530–536. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, Y., and Y. Shang. 2016. “Decisions of Outward Engagement and Location for Heterogeneous Multinational Firms: Evidence from Chinese Firms.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 12: 178–187. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. D., and H. Doucouliagos. 2012. Meta-regression Analysis in Economics and Business. Oxford, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, A. 2012. “Firm Productivity and the Number of FDI Destinations: Evidence from a Non-parametric Test.” Economics Letters 117 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, A. 2015. “Firm Heterogeneity and FDI in Distribution Services.” The World Economy 38 (8): 1295–1311. doi:10.1111/twec.12252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2015a. “World Investment Report 2015.” Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2015b. “International Trade in ICT Services and ICT-enabled Services: Proposed Indicators from the Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development.” Technical Note on ICT for Development, No. 3. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1999. “Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use.” https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. 2018. “World Trade Report 2018.” www.wto.org
   Google Scholar
• Yeaple, S. R. 2009. “Firm Heterogeneity and the Structure of U.S. Multinational Activity.” Journal of International Economics 78 (2): 206–215. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar