Assessing the economy-wide impacts of public R&D support options based on a computable general equilibrium model: focusing on types of fiscal incentives and beneficiaries

References

• Álvarez-Ayuso, I. C., C. Kao, and D. Romero-Jordán. 2018. “Long Run Effect of Public Grants and Tax Credits on R&D Investment: A Non-Stationary Panel Data Approach.” Economic Modelling 75: 93–104. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avellar, A. P. M. D., and M. D. R. A. Botelho. 2018. “Impact of Innovation Policies on Small, Medium and Large Brazilian Firms.” Applied Economics 50 (55): 5979–5995. doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1489109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEA. 2006. “Bea’s 2006 Research and Development Satellite Account: Preliminary Estimates of R&D for 1959-2002 and Effect on GDP and Other Measures.” Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Business 86 (December): 14–44.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. 2015. “Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Economic Surveys 29 (5): 917–942. doi:10.1111/joes.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérubé, C., and P. Mohnen. 2009. “Are Firms That Receive R&D Subsidies More Innovative?” Canadian Journal of Economics/revue Canadienne D’économique 42 (1): 206–225. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01505.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brautzsch, H. U., J. Günther, B. Loose, U. Ludwig, and N. Nulsch. 2015. “Can R&D Subsidies Counteract the Economic Crisis?–macroeconomic Effects in Germany.” Research Policy 44 (3): 623–633. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busom, I., B. Corchuelo, and E. Martínez-Ros. 2014. “Tax Incentives or Subsidies for Business R&D?” Small Business Economics 43 (3): 571–596. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9569-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., and J. Lee. 2017. “Repairing the R&D Market Failure: Public R&D Subsidy and the Composition of Private R&D.” Research Policy 46 (8): 1465–1478. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cin, B. C., Y. J. Kim, and N. S. Vonortas. 2017. “The Impact of Public R&D Subsidy on Small Firm Productivity: Evidence from Korean Smes.” Small Business Economics 48 (2): 345–360. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9786-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., and J. Delanote. 2015. “R&D Policies for Young Smes: Input and Output Effects.” Small Business Economics 45 (3): 465–485. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9661-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., P. Hanel, and J. M. Rosa. 2011. “Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Innovation: A Microeconometric Study on Canadian Firms.” Research Policy 40 (2): 217–229. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DortetBernadet, V., and M. Sicsic. 2017. “The Effect of R&D Subsidies and Tax Incentives on Employment: An Evaluation for Small Firms in France.” Economie Et Statistique 493 (1): 5–22. doi:10.24187/ecostat.2017.493s.1909.
   Google Scholar
• Elschner, C., C. Ernst, G. Licht, and C. Spengel. 2011. “What the Design of an R&D Tax Incentive Tells About Its Effectiveness: A Simulation of R&D Tax Incentives in the European Union.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (3): 233–256. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9146-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Vanden, K., and G. H. Jefferson. 2008. “Technology Diversity and Development: Evidence from China’s Industrial Enterprises.” Journal of Comparative Economics 36 (4): 658–672. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2008.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., and B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie. 2003. “The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12 (3): 225–243. doi:10.1080/10438590290004555.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, C., and J. D. Lee. 2016. “Macroeconomic Effects of R&D Tax Credits on Small and Medium Enterprises.” Economic Systems Research 28 (4): 467–481. doi:10.1080/09535314.2016.1240067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. S., and Lee, J. D. 2015. A CGE analysis for quantitative evaluation of electricity market changes. Energy Policy 83: 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. S., Y. Yeo, I. Oh, C. Hong, S. Jung, H. Yang, and J. D. Lee. 2021. “CGE Analysis of R&D Investment Policy Considering Trade-Offs Between Economic Growth and Stability.” Science & Public Policy 48 (3): 295–308. doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S., J. D. Lee, W. S. Hwang, and Y. Yeo. 2017. “Growth versus Equity: A CGE Analysis for Effects of Factor-Biased Technical Progress on Economic Growth and Employment.” Economic Modelling 60: 424–438. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2016.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasahara, H., K. Shimotsu, and M. Suzuki. 2014. “Does an R&D Tax Credit Affect R&D Expenditure? the Japanese R&D Tax Credit Reform in 2003.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 31: 72–97. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmenta, J. 1967. “On Estimation of the CES Production Function.” International Economic Review 8 (2): 180–189. doi:10.2307/2525600.
   Google Scholar
• Křístková, Z. 2013. “Analysis of Private RD Effects in a CGE Model with Capital Varieties: The Case of the Czech Republic.” Czech Journal of Food Sciences 63 (3): 262–287.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. 2018. “Government Extraction and Firm Size: Local Officials’ Responses to Fiscal Distress in China.” Journal of Comparative Economics 46 (4): 1310–1331. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardones, C., and A. Velásquez. 2021. “Macroeconomic, Intersectoral, and Environmental Effects of R&D Subsidies in Chile: An Input-Output Approach.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173: 121112. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, M., S. Lhuillery, P. Parrotta, and D. Sala. 2016. “Additionality or Crowding-Out? an Overall Evaluation of Public R&D Subsidy on Private R&D Expenditure.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1715–1730. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyata, Y., H. Shibusawa, I. Permana, and A. Wahyuni 2018. ”Constructing a CGE Model for Economic and Environmental Policies in Makassar City”. In Environmental and Natural Disaster Resilience of Indonesia, 149–161. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P. 2018. “Effectiveness of Direct and Indirect R&D Support.” In Innovation Systems, Policy and Management, edited by J. Niosi, pp. 53–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. R&D Tax Incentives: Design and Evidence. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. OECD Economic Surveys: Korea. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, I., Y. Yeo, and J. D. Lee. 2015. Efficiency versus equality: Comparing design options for indirect emissions accounting in the Korean emissions trading scheme. Sustainability 7(11): 14982–15002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, N. 2016. “Do Tax Credits Stimulate R&D Spending? the Effect of the R&D Tax Credit in Its First Decade.” Journal of Public Economics 140: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravšelj, D., and A. Aristovnik. 2020. “The Impact of Public R&D Subsidies and Tax Incentives on Business R&D Expenditures.” International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 8 (1): 160–179. doi:10.35808/ijeba/416.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Y., and C. Xiao. 2019. “Corporate Tax Policy and Heterogeneous Firm Innovation: Evidence from a Developing Country.” Journal of Comparative Economics 47 (2): 470–486. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2019.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szücs, F. 2020. “Do Research Subsidies Crowd Out Private R&D of Large Firms? Evidence from European Framework Programmes.” Research Policy 49 (3): 103923. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USITC. 2010. “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Characteristics and Performance.” Investigation No. 332-510. USITC Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Villoria, N. B., and P. V. Preckel. 2017. “Gaussian Quadratures Vs. Monte Carlo Experiments for Systematic Sensitivity Analysis of Computable General Equilibrium Model Results.” Economics Bulletin 37 (1): 480–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., S. Jung, and J. Lee. 2012. “A Study on the Knowledge-Based Social Accounting Matrix.” Productivity Review 26 (3): 257–285. doi:10.15843/kpapr.26.3.201209.257.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, Y., and J. D. Lee. 2020. “Revitalizing the Race Between Technology and Education: Investigating the Growth Strategy for the Knowledge-Based Economy Based on a CGE Analysis.” Technology in Society 62: 101295. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, Y., Lee, J. D., & Jung, S. 2021. Winners and losers in a knowledge-based economy: investigating the policy packages for an inclusive growth based on a computable general equilibrium analysis of Korea. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and J. Guan. 2018. “The Time-Varying Impacts of Government Incentives on Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 135: 132–144. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar