Leader-follower dynamics in real historical time: a Markovian test of non-linear causality between sail and steam (co-)development

References

• Allen, R. C. 2011. Global Economic History: A Very Short Introduction. Vol. 282. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, P., and B. Greenhill. 1997. The First Atlantic Liners: Seamanship in the Age of Paddle Wheel, Sail, and Screw. London: Conway Maritime Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ardelean, A., V. Lugovskyy, A. Skiba, and D. Terner. 2022. “Fathoming Shipping Costs.”
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J., and D. M. Williams. 2011. The Impact of Technological Change: The Early Steamship in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basawa, I. V. 2014. Statistical Inferences for Stochastic Processes: Theory and Methods. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Basberg, B. L. 1998. “The Floating Factory: Dominant Designs and Technological Development of Twentieth-Century Whaling Factory Ships.” Northern Mariner 8 (1): 21–38. doi:10.25071/2561-5467.648.
   Google Scholar
• Berchtold, A. 2001. “Estimation in the Mixture Transition Distribution Model.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 22 (4): 379–397. doi:10.1111/1467-9892.00231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingsley, P. 1961. “Statistical Methods in Markov Chains.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 (1): 12–40. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705136.
   Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F. 2018. “Co-Evolutionary Growth: A System Dynamics Model.” Economic Modelling 70: 272–287. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D.-G., and Y. L. Lio. 2009. “A Novel Estimation Approach for Mixture Transition Distribution Model in High-Order Markov Chains.” Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 38 (5): 990–1003. doi:10.1080/03610910802715009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, W.-K., E. S. Fung, and M. K. Ng. 2002. “A Multivariate Markov Chain Model for Categorical Data Sequences and Its Applications in Demand Predictions.” IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 13 (3): 187–199. doi:10.1093/imaman/13.3.187.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, W.-K., and M. K. Ng. 2006. “Markov Chains.” Models, algorithms and applications.
   Google Scholar
• Comte, F., and O. Lieberman. 2000. “Second-Order Noncausality in Multivariate GARCH Processes.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 21 (5): 535–557. doi:10.1111/1467-9892.00197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. 2004. British Tramp Shipping, 1750-1914, St. Johns, Newfoundland: International Maritime Economic History Association. .
   Google Scholar
• Damásio, B., F. Louçã, and J. Nicolau. 2018. “The Changing Economic Regimes and Expected Time to Recover of the Peripheral Countries Under the Euro: A Nonparametric Approach.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 507: 524–533. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damásio, B., and S. Mendonça. 2019. “Modelling Insurgent-Incumbent Dynamics: Vector Autoregressions, Multivariate Markov Chains, and the Nature of Technological Competition.” Applied Economics Letters 26 (10): 843–849. doi:10.1080/13504851.2018.1502863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damásio, B., and J. Nicolau. 2013. “Combining a Regression Model with a Multivariate Markov Chain in a Forecasting Problem.” Statistics & Probability Letters 90: 108–113. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2014.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Liso, N., and G. Filatrella. 2008. “On Technology Competition: A Formal Analysis of the ‘Sailing-Ship Effect’.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 17 (6): 593–610. doi:10.1080/10438590701560360.
   Google Scholar
• Diebolt, C., and H. Hagemann. 2019. “Mixing History of Economic Thought with Cliometrics: Room for Debates on Economic Growth.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (4): 654–658. doi:10.1080/09672567.2019.1647636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droumaguet, M., A. Warne, and T. Woźniak. 2017. “Granger Causality and Regime Inference in Markov Switching VAR Models with Bayesian Methods.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 32 (4): 802–818. doi:10.1002/jae.2531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreiro, L. D. 2020. Bridging the Seas: The Rise of Naval Architecture in the Industrial Age, 1800-2000. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreiro, L. D., and D. McGee. 2006. “Ships and Science: The Birth of Naval Architecture in the Scientific Revolution, 1600-1800.” Aestimatio: Critical Reviews in the History of Science 3: 171–175.
   Google Scholar
• Filatrella, G., and N. De Liso. 2020. “Predicting One Type of Technological Motion? a Nonlinear Map to Study the ‘Sailing-Ship’Effect.” Soft Computing 24 (18): 13813–13822. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04622-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatrella, G., and N. De Liso. 2021. “The R&D Stochastic Component Within the ‘Sailing-Ship Effect’.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 30 (7): 731–749. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1772707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, R., and K. H. O’Rourke. 2009. Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Vol. 30. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, E. S., and T. Kuen Siu. 2012. “A Flexible Markov Chain Approach for Multivariate Credit Ratings.” Computational Economics 39 (2): 135–143. doi:10.1007/s10614-011-9258-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschau, A. 1992. “Exchangeability in Multivariate Markov Chain Models.” Biometrics 48 (3): 751–763. doi:10.2307/2532342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, W. W. 2019. “The Persistent Effect of Temporary Input Cost Advantages in Shipbuilding, 1850-1911.” NYU Stern School of Business working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, D., and A. Pagan. 2011. “An Econometric Analysis of Some Models for Constructed Binary Time Series.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 29 (1): 86–95. doi:10.1198/jbes.2009.08005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, C. K. 2004. “Trade: Discovery, Mercantilism and Technology”.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Britain, edited by R. Floud and P. Jonhson, 1700-1860, pp. 175–203. Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, P. A., C. W. Autry, and W. E. Wilcox. 2005. “Liquidity Implications of Reverse Logistics for Retailers: A Markov Chain Approach.” Journal of Retailing 81 (3): 191–203. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2005.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., and C. O’Grada. 2018. “Speed Under Sail During the Early Industrial Revolution.”
   Google Scholar
• Lèbre, S., and P.-Y. Bourguignon. 2008. “An EM Algorithm for Estimation in the Mixture Transition Distribution Model.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 78 (8): 713–729. doi:10.1080/00949650701266666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T.-H., and W. Yang. 2012. “Money-Income Granger-Causality in Quantiles.” Advances in Econometrics 30: 385.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., M. Zhu, R. Klein, and N. Kong. 2014. “Using a Partially Observable Markov Chain Model to Assess Colonoscopy Screening Strategies–a Cohort Study.” European Journal of Operational Research 238 (1): 313–326. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liso, D., S. A. Nicola, and G. Filatrella. 2021. “The “Sailing-Ship Effect” as a Technological Principle.” Industrial and Corporate Change 30 (6): 1459–1478. doi:10.1093/icc/dtab021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl, H. 2005. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Madureira, N. L. 2010. “Oil in the Age of Steam.” Journal of Global History 5 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1017/S1740022809990349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markov, A. A. 1913. An example of statistical investigation of the text Eugene Onegin concerning the connection of samples in chains. (In Russian.) Bulletin of the Imperial Academy of Sciences of St. Petersburg 7(3):153–162. Unpublished English translation by Morris Halle, 1955. English translation by Alexander Y. Nitussov, Lioudmila Voropai, Gloria Custance and David Link, 2006. Science in Context 19(4):591–600.
   Google Scholar
• Maskawa, J.-I. 2003. “Multivariate Markov Chain Modeling for Stock Markets.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 324 (1–2): 317–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, S. 2013. “The Sailing Ship Effect: Reassessing History as a Source of Insight on Technical Change.” Research Policy 42 (10): 1724–1738. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B.R. 1988. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolau, J. 2014. “A New Model for Multivariate Markov Chains.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 41 (4): 1124–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolau, J. 2017. “A Simple Nonparametric Method to Estimate the Expected Time to Cross a Threshold.” Statistics & Probability Letters 123: 146–152. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2016.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolau, J., and F. Ivo Riedlinger. 2015. “Estimation and Inference in Multivariate Markov Chains.” Statistical Papers 56 (4): 1163–1173. doi:10.1007/s00362-014-0630-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, J., and S. Tenold. 2017. “Maritime History: A Health Check.” International Journal of Maritime History 29 (2): 344–354. doi:10.1177/0843871417695490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascali, L. 2017. “The Wind of Change: Maritime Technology, Trade, and Economic Development.” The American Economic Review 107 (9): 2821–2854. doi:10.1257/aer.20140832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, S., and P. Robertson. 1979. The British Shipbuilding Industry: 1870-1914. Cambridge, Mass; Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polónia, A., B. Fabiano, and G. C. Conceic¸ão. 2019. Connecting Worlds: Production and Circulation of Knowledge in the First Global Age. Newcastle; Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Psaradakis, Z., M. O. Ravn, and M. Sola. 2005. “Markov Switching Causality and the Money–output Relationship.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (5): 665–683. doi:10.1002/jae.819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. 1985. “A Model for High-Order Markov Chains.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 47 (3): 528–539. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01383.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A., and S. Tavaré. 1994. “Estimation and Modelling Repeated Patterns in High Order Markov Chains with the Mixture Transition Distribution Model.” Applied Statistics 43 (1): 179–199. doi:10.2307/2986120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, P. 2017. “The Ordinary Merchant Ship in the British Atlantic, 1600–1800: A Call for Further Research.” International Journal of Maritime History 29 (4): 911–926. doi:10.1177/0843871417726750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, V., G. Yoguel, and O. Lerena. 2017. “The Ontology of Complexity and the Neo-Schumpeterian Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27 (4): 761–793. doi:10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. 1972. “Factors Affecting the Diffusion of Technology.” Explorations in Economic History 10 (1): 3–33. doi:10.1016/0014-4983(72)90001-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, A. D., and Z. Sen. 2001. “First-Order Markov Chain Approach to Wind Speed Modelling.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 89 (3–4): 263–269. doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00081-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sericola, B. 2013. Markov Chains: Theory and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C. A. 1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 48 (1): 1–48. doi:10.2307/1912017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu, T.-K., S. E. F. Wai-Ki Ching, and M. K. Ng. 2005. “On a Multivariate Markov Chain Model for Credit Risk Measurement.” Quantitative Finance 5 (6): 543–556. doi:10.1080/14697680500383714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaven, A. 1980. “The Shipbuilding Industry.” In The Dynamics of Victorian Business: Problems and Perspectives, edited by Roy Church 107-25. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2018. Coal, Steam and Ships: Engineering, Enterprise and Empire on the Nineteenth-Century Seas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solar, P. M., and P. de Zwart. 2017. “Why Were Dutch East Indiamen so Slow?” International Journal of Maritime History 29 (4): 738–751. doi:10.1177/0843871417725487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. 2009. Maritime Economics 3e. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turchin, P. B. 1986. “Modelling the Effect of Host Patch Size on Mexican Bean Beetle Emigration.” Ecology 67 (1): 124–132. doi:10.2307/1938510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, R. W. 2011. Shipping and Economic Growth 1350-1850. Amsterdam: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, D.-M., and W.-K. Ching. 2010. “A New Estimation Method for Multivariate Markov Chain Model with Application in Demand Predictions.” In Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (BIFE), 2010 Third International Conference on, 126–130. Massachusetts: IEEE.
   Google Scholar