A High-Dimensional Approach to Predicting Audit Opinions

References

• Anandarajan, M., and A. Anandarajan. 1999. “A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques with a Qualitative Response Model for Auditor’s Going Concern Reporting.” Expert Systems with Applications 16 (4): 385–392. doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(99)00014-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, P., and H. D. Huan. 1993. “The Auditor’s Going Concern Decision: Some UK Evidence Concerning Independence and Competence.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 20 (2): 213–228. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00660.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T. B., and R. H. Tabor. 1991. “Empirical Analysis of Audit Uncertainty Qualifications.” Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2): 350–370. doi:10.2307/2491053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabazon, A., and P. B. Keenan. 2004. “A Hybrid Genetic Model for the Prediction of Corporate Failure.” Computational Management Science 1 (3–4): 293–310. doi:10.1007/s10287-004-0017-6.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, and R. A. Olshen. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Bruynseels, L., W. R. Knechel, and M. Willekens. 2011. “Auditor Differentiation, Mitigating Management Actions, and Audit-Reporting Accuracy for Distressed Firms.” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (1): 1–20. doi:10.2308/aud.2011.30.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., N. L. Fargher, M. A. Geiger, C. S. Lennox, K. Raghunandan, and M. Willekens. 2013. “Audit Reporting for Going-Concern Uncertainty: A Research Synthesis.” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (Supplement 1): 353–384. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. H., Z. L. Kenny, and R. W. Ray. 2012. “Government Ownership, Accounting-Based Regulations, and the Pursuit of Favorable Audit Opinions: Evidence from China.” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (4): 47–64. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. 2019. “An Effective Going Concern Prediction Model for the Sustainability of Enterprises and Capital Market Development.” Applied Economics 51 (31): 3376–3388. doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1578855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C. W., and B. K. Church. 1992. “Default on Debt Obligations and the Issuance of Going-Concern Opinions.” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 11 (2): 30–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., M. Xiumin, and W. Xin. 2013. “Insider Trading, Litigation Concerns, and Auditor Going-Concern Opinions.” The Accounting Review 88 (2): 365–393. doi:10.2308/accr-50347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, D., M. Magnan, and B. Morard. 1995. “The Auditor’s Consideration of the Going Concern Assumption: A Diagnostic Model.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 10 (2): 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Dopuch, N., R. W. Holthausen, and R. W. Leftwich. 1987. “Predicting Audit Qualifications with Financial and Market Variables.” The Accounting Review 62 (3): 431–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., C. Gaganis, and F. Pasiouras. 2005. “Explaining Qualifications in Audit Reports Using a Support Vector Machine Methodology.” Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 13 (4): 197–215. doi:10.1002/isaf.268.
   Google Scholar
• Etheridge, H. L., R. S. Sriram, and H. Y. K. Hsu. 2000. “A Comparison of Selected Artificial Neural Networks That Help Auditors Evaluate Client Financial Viability.” Decision Sciences 31 (2): 531–550. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb01633.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. 2001. “Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine.” Annals of Statistics 29 (5): 1189–1232. doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. 2002. “Stochastic Gradient Boosting.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 38 (4): 367–378. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2000. “Additive Logistic Regression: A Statistical View of Boosting (With Discussion and a Rejoinder by the Authors).” Annals of Statistics 28 (2): 337–374. doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaganis, C., F. Pasiouras, and M. Doumpos. 2007. “Probabilistic Neural Networks for the Identification of Qualified Audit Opinions.” Expert Systems with Applications 32 (1): 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaganis, C., F. Pasiouras, C. Spathis, and C. Zopounidis. 2007. “A Comparison of Nearest Neighbours, Discriminant and Logit Models for Auditing Decisions.” Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 15 (1–2): 23–40. doi:10.1002/isaf.283.
   Google Scholar
• Goo, Y.-J.-J., D.-J. Chi, and Z.-D. Shen. 2016. “Improving the Prediction of Going Concern of Taiwanese Listed Companies Using a Hybrid of LASSO with Data Mining Techniques.” SpringerPlus 5 (1): 539. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2186-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, J. V., J. B. McDonald, and J. D. Stice. 1992. “Artificial Intelligence and Generalized Qualitative-Response Models: An Empirical Test on Two Audit Decision-Making Domains.” Decision Sciences 23 (3): 708–723. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1992.tb00413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y.-F., and W.-P. Lee. 2020. “Evaluation of the Going-Concern Status for Companies: An Ensemble Framework-Based Model.” Journal of Forecasting 39 (4): 687–706. doi:10.1002/for.2653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan, C.-L. 2021. “Using Deep Learning Algorithms for Cpas’ Going Concern Prediction.” Information 12 (2): 73. doi:10.3390/info12020073.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. 2017. “Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction: A High Dimensional Analysis.” Review of Accounting Studies 22 (3): 1366–1422. doi:10.1007/s11142-017-9407-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., and T. Wang. 2019. “Predicting Private Company Failure: A Multi-Class Analysis.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 61: 161–188. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2019.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. E., and D. D. Williams. 2013. “Do Going Concern Audit Reports Protect Auditors from Litigation? A Simultaneous Equations Approach”.” The Accounting Review 88 (1): 199–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keasey, K., R. Watson, and P. Wynarczyk. 1988. “The Small Company Audit Qualification: A Preliminary Investigation.” Accounting and Business Research 18 (72): 323–334. doi:10.1080/00014788.1988.9729379.
   Google Scholar
• Kida, T. 1980. “An Investigation into Auditors’ Continuity and Related Qualification Judgments.” Journal of Accounting Research 18 (2): 506–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkos, E., C. Spathis, A. Nanopoulos, and Y. Manolopoulos. 2007. “Identifying Qualified Auditors’ Opinions: A Data Mining Approach.” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 4 (1): 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, G., and A. Anandarajan. 1999. “The Usefulness of Off‐balance Sheet Variables as Predictors of Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions: An Empirical Analysis.” Managerial Auditing Journal 14 (6): 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H. C., and R. M. Brown. 1991. “Probit Prediction of Going and Non‐going Concerns.” Managerial Auditing Journal 6 (3): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H. C., and C. K. Low. 2004. “Going Concern Prediction Using Data Mining Techniques.” Managerial Auditing Journal 19 (3): 462–476.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H. C., and S. S. Tan. 1999. “A Neural Network Approach to the Prediction of Going Concern Status.” Accounting and Business Research 29 (3): 211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., and J. Krishnan. 1996. “The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in the Audit Opinion Decision: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 11 (4): 565–586.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, E. K., and T. Laitinen. 1998. “Qualified Audit Reports in Finland: Evidence from Large Companies.” European Accounting Review 7 (4): 639–653.
   Google Scholar
• Lenard, M. J., P. Alam, and G. R. Madey. 1995. “The Application of Neural Networks and a Qualitative Response Model to the Auditor’s Going Concern Uncertainty Decision.” Decision Sciences 26 (2): 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, D., L. Bruynseels, B. Baesens, M. Willekens, and J. Vanthienen. 2008. “Predicting Going Concern Opinion with Data Mining.” Decision Support Systems 45 (4): 765–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, K., and K. B. Schwartz. 1987. “An Empirical Investigation of Audit Qualification Decisions in the Presence of Going Concern Uncertainties.” Contemporary Accounting Research 3 (2): 302–315.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, G. S., and S. T. Teh. 1993. “Predicting Uncertainty Audit Qualifications in Australia Using Publicly Available Information.” Accounting & Finance 33 (2): 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F. 1985. “A Multivariate Analysis of the Auditor’s Going-Concern Opinion Decision.” Journal of Accounting Research 23 (2): 668–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., W. Hopwood, and J. M. McKeown. 1997. “The Influence of Contrary Information and Mitigating Factors on Audit Opinion Decisions on Bankrupt Companies.” Journal of Accounting Research 35 (2): 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasiouras, F., C. Gaganis, and C. Zopounidis. 2007. “Multicriteria Decision Support Methodologies for Auditing Decisions: The Case of Qualified Audit Reports in the UK.” European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3): 1317–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, A. J., and H. Zhang. 2015. “Do Industry-Specialist Auditors Influence Stock Price Crash Risk?”.” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34 (3): 47–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi, A. 2021. “Audit Opinion Prediction: A Comparison of Data Mining Techniques.” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 18 (2): 125–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P., and E. García‐meca. 2005. “Audit Qualifications and Corporate Governance in Spanish Listed Firms.” Managerial Auditing Journal 20 (7): 725–738.
   Google Scholar
• Spathis, C., M. Doumpos, and C. Zopounidis. 2003. “Using Client Performance Measures to Identify Pre-Engagement Factors Associated with Qualified Audit Reports in Greece.” The International Journal of Accounting 38 (3): 267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, C. C., D. J. Chi, and Y. R. Lin. 2014. “Going-Concern Prediction Using Hybrid Random Forests and Rough Set Approach.” Information Sciences 254: 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar