An empirical analysis of the impacts of competition on procurement costs

References

• Anderson, R., and W. Kovacic. 2009. ”Competition Policy and International Trade Liberalisation: Essential Complements to Ensure Good Performance in Public Procurement Markets.” Public Procurement Law Review 18 (2): 67–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bajari, P., and A. Hortaçsu.2003. “The Winner’s Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions.” The RAND Journal of Economics 34 (2): 329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajari, P., R. McMillan, and T. Tadelis. 2003. “Auction versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis.” NBER Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Brannman, L., J. D. Klein, and L. W. Weiss. 1987. “The Price Effects of Increased Competition in Auction Markets.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (1): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulow, J., and P. Klemperer. 1996. “Auctions versus Negotiations.” The American Economic Review 86 (1): 180–194.
   Google Scholar
• Coviello, D., and S. Gagliarducci. 2017. “Tenure in Office and Public Procurement.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2765159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coviello, D., L. Moretti, G. Spagnolo, and P. Valbonesi. 2017. “Court Efficiency and Procurement Performance.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 120 (3): 826–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12225.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, D., T. Jeitschko, and G. Kosmopoulou. 2009. “Entry and Bidding in Common and Private Value Auctions with an Unknown Number of Rivals.” Review of Industrial Organization 35 (1): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9223-2.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giovanni, J., M. García-Santana, P. Jeenas, E. Moral-Benito, and J. Pijoan-Mas. 2022. “Buy Big or Buy Small?: Procurement Policies, Firms’ Financing, and the Macroeconomy.” FRB of the New York Staff Report.
   Google Scholar
• Di Giovanni, J., M. García-Santana, P. Jeenas, E. Moral-Benito, and J. Pijoan-Mas. 2022. “Government Procurement and Access to Credit: Firm Dynamics and Aggregate Implications.” Working Papers CEMFI.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A., and A. Iimi. 2008. “Procurement Efficiency for Infrastructure Development and Financial Needs Reassessed.” Policy Research Working Paper. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A., and A. Imi. 2010. “Auctions with Endogenous Participation and Quality Thresholds: Evidence from ODA Infrastructure Procurement.” Policy Research Working Paper. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Economic Efficiency and Legal Effectiveness of Review and Remedies Procedures for Public Contracts. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando-Gamir, A. 2015. Mapping High-Level Corruption Risks in Spanish Public Procurement. Budapest: Corruption Research Center Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Ganuza, J. J. 1997. “Los sobrecostes en las obras públicas. Un análisis económico del caso español.” Economía Industrial 318:111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. 2002. “Competition and Collusion in a Government Procurement Auction Market.” Atlantic Economic Journal 30 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299143.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, J., and K. M. Tukiainen. 2020. “Competition and Litigation in Swedish Public Procurement.” Kokurrensverket Swedish Competition Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Heijboer, G. and J. Telgen. 2002. “Choosing the Open or the Restricted Procedure: A Big Deal or a Big Deal?” Journal of Public Procurement 2 (2): 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-02-2002-B002.
   Google Scholar
• Jääskeläinen, J., and J. Tukiainen. 2019. “Anatomy of Public Procurement.” VATT Institute for Economic Research Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., and I. Perrigne. 2003. “Timber Sale Auctions with Random Reserve Prices.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2003. Transparency in Government Procurement: The Benefits of Efficient Governance and Orientations for Achieving IT. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Government at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Onur, I., R. Özcan, and B. Kamil. 2012. “Public Procurement Auctions and Competition in Turkey.” Review of Industrial Organization 40 (3): 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9299-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onur, I., and M. Velamuri. 2014. Competition, endogeneity and the winning bid: An empirical analysis of eBay auctions. Information Economics and Policy 26:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Palguta, J., and F. Pertold. 2017. “Manipulation of Procurement Contracts: Evidence from the Introduction of Discretionary Thresholds.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9 (2): 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Graells, A. 2011. “Public Procurement Below Thresholds in Spain.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1888186.
   Google Scholar
• Saussier, S., and J. Tirole. 2015. “Strengthening the Efficiency of Public Procurement.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562719.
   Google Scholar
• Tas, B. K. O. 2020. “Effect of Public Procurement Regulation on Competition and Cost-Effectiveness.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 58 (1): 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-020-09409-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, B. K. O. 2023. “Bunching Below Thresholds to Manipulate Public Procurement.” Empirical Economics 64 (1): 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02250-4.
   Google Scholar