Benefits from wood interior in a hospital room: a preference study

References

• American Society for Healthcare Engineering. 2008. “Guidance Statement: Considering Evidence-Based Design?” Accessed February 14, 2013. http://www.ashe.org/advocacy/advisories/2008/pdfs/guide080731_ebd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, A. E. 2005. Health Impacts of Healing Environments: A Review of Evidence of Benefits of Nature, Daylight, Fresh Air and Quiet in Healthcare Settings. Groningen: University Hospital Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, R. D., and S. A. Bowe. 2008. “Environmental Impact of Producing Hardwood Lumberusing Life-Cycle Inventory.” Wood and Fiber Science 40: 448–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringslimark, T., T. Hartig, and G. G. Patil. 2007. “Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants in Workplaces: Putting Experimental Results into Context.” HortScience 42: 581–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringslimark, T., T. Hartig, and G. G. Patil. 2009. “The Psychological Benefits of Indoor Plants: A Critical Review of the Experimental Literature.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29: 422–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome, D. 2005. “Designing the Indoor Environment for People.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management 1: 45–55. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2005.9684583
   Google Scholar
• Dodoo, A., L. Gustavsson, and R. Sathre. 2009. “Carbon Implications of End-of-Life Management of Building Materials.” Resource Conservation and Recycling 53: 278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeld, T., B. Veiersted, L. Sandvik, G. Riise, and F. Levy. 1998. “The Effect of Indoor Foliage Plants on Health and Discomfort Symptoms Among Office Workers.” Indoor and Built Environment 7: 204–209. doi: 10.1177/1420326X9800700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., G. W. Evans, L. D. Jamner, D. S. Davis, and T. Gärling. 2003. “Tracking Restoration in Natural and Urban Field Settings.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., T. Bringslimark, and G. G. Patil. 2008. “Restorative Environmental Design: What, When, Where, and for Whom?” In Bringing Buildings to Life: The Theory and Practice of Biophilic Building Design, edited by S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, 133–152. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Health Council of the Netherlands. 2004. Nature and Health: The Influence of Nature on Social, Psychological and Physical Well-Being (Publication no. 2004/09). The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Joye, Y. 2007. “Architectural Lessons From Environmental Psychology: The Case of Biophilic Architecture.” Review of General Psychology 11: 305–328. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., R. Kaplan, and J. S. Wendt. 1972. “Rated Preferences and Complexity for Natural and Urban Visual Material.” Perception and Psychophysics 12: 354–356. doi: 10.3758/BF03207221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. 2005. Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. 2008. “Dimensions, Elements, and Attributes of Biophilic Design.” In Bringing Buildings to Life: The Theory and Practice of Biophilic Building Design, edited by S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, 3–20. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, R. C. 1987. “Human behaviour, Cognition and Affect in the Natural Environment.” In Handbook of Environmental Psychology, edited by D. Stokols, and I. Altman, 783–825, Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, K., T. Gärling, and K. M. Stormark. 2003. “Selective Attention and Heart Rate Responses to Natural and Urban Environments.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 125–134. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, V. I., and C. H. Pearson-Mims. 2000. “Physical Discomfort May Be Reduced in the Presence of Interior Plants.” HortTechnology 10: 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Minke, K. 2009. Building with Earth: Design and Technology of a Sustainable Architecture. 2nd ed. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. O. 1981. “A Prison Environment's Effect on Health Care Service Demands.” Journal of Environmental Systems 11: 17–34. doi: 10.2190/KM50-WH2K-K2D1-DM69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.-H., R. H. Mattson, and E. Kim. 2004. “Pain Tolerance Effects of Ornamental Plants in a Simulated Hospital Patient Room.” Acta Horticulturae 639: 241–247.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, R., L. G. Tassinary, R. S. Ulrich, M. R. Hebl, and M. Grossman-Alexander. 1998. “The View From The Road: Implications For Stress Recovery And Immunization.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 18: 113–140. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1998.0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A., and R. Thomas. 2009. Sustainable Urban Design: An Environmental Approach. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Stankos, M., and B. Schwarz. 2007. “Evidence-Based Design in Healthcare: A Theoretical Dilemma.” Interdisciplinary Design and Research e-Journal 1 (1). Accessed Februrary 14, 2013. http://spokane.wsu.edu/academics/Design/IDRP2/Vol_1/stankos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and A. Mauck. 2005. “The Promises and Pitfalls of Evidence-Based Medicine.” Health Affairs 24: 18–28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 1983. “Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environments.” In Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research Vol. 6. Behavior and Environment, edited by I. Altman, and J. F. Wohlwill, 85–126. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 1984. “View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.” Science 224: 420–421. doi: 10.1126/science.6143402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 1985. Aesthetic and Emotional Influences of Vegetation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council of Building Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S. 2008. “Biophilic Theory and Research in Healthcare Design.” In Bringing Buildings to Life: The Theory and Practice of Biophilic Building Design, edited by S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, 87–106. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, B., R. Miner, M. Spinney, and L. S. Heath. 2008. “The Greenhouse Gas and Energy Impacts of Using Wood Instead of Alternatives in Residential Construction in the United States.” Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S., R. F. Simons, B. D. Losito, E. Fiorito, M. A. Miles, and M. Zelson. 1991. “Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 201–230. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S., and C. Zimring. 2004. The Role of the Physical Environment in the Hospital of the 21^st Century: A Once-in-a-Lifetime Opportunity (Project Report). Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zube, E. H., and T. W. Anderson. 1975. “Perception and Prediction of Scenic Resource Values of the Northeast.” In Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions, and resources, edited by E. H. Zube, R.O. Brush, and J. G. Fabos, 151–167. Stroudsburg, Dowden: Hutchinson & Ross.
   Google Scholar