A comparison between preference judgments of curvature and sharpness in architectural façades

References

• Aguilar, Javier Senosiain. 2003. Bio-architecture. New York: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albarello, Carlo. 2016. “Costruzioni letterarie e valori cromatici nel Danteum di Pietro Lingeri e Giuseppe Terragni.” Opus Incertum 2: 104–115.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, Jay. 1992. “Prospects and Refuges re-Visited.” In Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Application, edited by Jack L. Nasar, 27–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, Jay. 1996. The Experience of Landscape. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bar, Moshe, and Maital Neta. 2007. “Visual Elements of Subjective Preference Modulate Amygdala Activation.” Neuropsychologia 45 (10): 2191–2200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, Moshe, Maital Neta, and Heather Linz. 2006. “Very First Impressions.” Emotion 6 (2): 269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, Daniel E. 1970. “Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value.” Perception & Psychophysics 8 (5): 279–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertamini, Marco, Letizia Palumbo, Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes, and Mai Galatsidas. 2016. “Do Observers Like Curvature or do They Dislike Angularity?” British Journal of Psychology 107 (1): 154–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, Ingwer, and Patrick JF Groenen. 2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bove, Giuseppe. 2011. “Analysis of Skew-Symmetry in Proximity Data.” In New Perspectives in Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis, 203–210. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bove, Giuseppe. 2012. “Exploratory Approaches to Seriation by Asymmetric Multidimensional Scaling.” Behaviormetrika 39 (1): 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fergus W., and J. G. Robson. 1968. “Application of Fourier Analysis to the Visibility of Gratings.” The Journal of Physiology 197 (3): 551–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, Claus-Christian. 2010. “The Cycle of Preference: Long-Term Dynamics of Aesthetic Appreciation.” Acta Psychologica 134 (2): 233–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. Christian, and Helmut Leder. 2005. “The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET). A Method to Capture Dynamic Effects of Innovativeness and Attractiveness.” Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 19 (5): 587–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirumbolo, Antonio, Ambra Brizi, Stefano Mastandrea, and Lucia Mannetti. 2014. “‘Beauty Is No Quality in Things Themselves’: Epistemic Motivation Affects Implicit Preferences for Art.” PloS one 9 (10): e110323. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, Katherine, Paul J. Silvia, Marco Bertamini, Letizia Palumbo, and Oshin Vartanian. 2017. “Curve appeal: Exploring individual differences in preference for curved versus angular objects.” i-Perception 8: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosen, Annemarie S., and Michael J. Ostwald. 2016. “Evidence for Prospect-Refuge Theory: A Meta-Analysis of the Findings of Environmental Preference Research.” City, Territory and Architecture 3 (1): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Fantz, Robert L., and Simon B. Miranda. 1975. “Newborn Infant Attention to Form of Contour.” Child Development 1: 224–228.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, Dominic, and Arnold J. Wilkins. 2008. “Uncomfortable Images in Art and Nature.” Perception 37 (7): 1098–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, David J. 1987. “Relations Between the Statistics of Natural Images and the Response Properties of Cortical Cells.” Josa a 4 (12): 2379–2394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gann, David, Ammon Salter, and Jennifer Whyte. 2003. “Design Quality Indicator as a Tool for Thinking.” Building Research & Information 31 (5): 318–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler, Wilson S. 2008. “Visual Perception and the Statistical Properties of Natural Scenes.” Annu. Rev. Psychol 59: 167–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendall, John. 2009. “Biomimicry: Architecture That Imitates Life.” Harvard Magazine Sept-Oct: 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Puerto, Gerardo, Enric Munar, and Marcos Nadal. 2016. “Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9: 712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman, R., ed. 2009. People and Buildings. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Ursula, Gryc Orna, and Hareli Shlomo. 2013. “How shapes influence social judgments.” Social Cognition 31: 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard, Paul B., and Louise O'Hare. 2015. “Uncomfortable Images Produce Non-Sparse Responses in a Model of Primary Visual Cortex.” Royal Society Open Science 2 (2): 140535 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, Grant. 1991. The Wright Space: Pattern and Meaning in Frank Lloyd Wright's Houses. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, Grant. 1999. Origins of Architectural Pleasure. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, Vasanti, Melissa Hines, and Susan Golombok. 2010. “Infants’ Preferences for Toys, Colors, and Shapes: Sex Differences and Similarities.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 39 (6): 1261–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juricevic, Igor, Leah Land, Arnold Wilkins, and Michael A. Webster. 2010. “Visual Discomfort and Natural Image Statistics.” Perception 39 (7): 884–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, An T.D., Jasmine Payne, Charlotte Clarke, A. Kelly Murphy, Francesca Prudenziati, Elise Armsby, Olivier Penacchio, and Arnold J. Wilkins. 2017. “Discomfort from urban scenes: Metabolic consequences.” Landscape and Urban Planning 160: 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, Helmut, Benno Belke, Andries Oeberst, and Dorothee Augustin. 2004. “A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments.” British Journal of Psychology 95 (4): 489–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, Helmut, and Claus-Christian Carbon. 2005. “Dimensions in Appreciation of Car Interior Design.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (5): 603–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, Helmut, Pablo PL Tinio, and Moshe Bar. 2011. “Emotional Valence Modulates the Preference for Curved Objects.” Perception 40 (6): 649–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, Roy, and Ronen Talmon. 2018. “Learning the geometry of common latent variables using alternating-diffusion.” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 44: 509–536. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063520315001190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidwell, William, Kritina Holden, and Jill Butler. Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, Peter C. 2010. Evidence-based Design of Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Responsive Approach to Creating Learning Environments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• LoBue, Vanessa. 2014. “Deconstructing the Snake: The Relative Roles of Perception, Cognition, and Emotion on Threat Detection.” Emotion 14 (4): 701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Isaac, and Dar Reuven. 2000. “Fear reduction by psychotherapies: Recent findings, future directions.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 6: 507–511.
   Google Scholar
• Mass, Anne, Ilaria Merici, Erica Villafranca, Rosaria Furlani, Elena Gaburro, Anna Getrevi, and Margherita Masserini. 2000. “Intimidating Buildings: Can Courthouse Architecture Affect Perceived Likelihood of Conviction?” Environment and Behavior 32 (5): 674–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastandrea, Stefano, Gabriella Bartoli, and Giuseppe Carrus. 2011. “The Automatic Aesthetic Evaluation of Different art and Architectural Styles.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5 (2): 126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastandrea, Stefano, and Fridanna Maricchiolo. 2014. “Implicit and Explicit Aesthetic Evaluation of Design Objects.” Art & Perception 2 (1–2): 141–162.
   Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto, and Ulf Böckenholt. 2009. Modeling preference data." The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, 264–282. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, I. Chris, and Wen Wu. 2013. ““The Square is … Bulky, Heavy, Contented, Plain, Good-Natured, Stupid … ”: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Aesthetics and Meanings of Rectangles.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 7 (2): 130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munar, Enric, Gerardo Gómez-Puerto, Josep Call, and Marcos Nadal. 2015. “Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.” PloS one 10 (11): e0141106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, Akinori, and Tadashi Imaizumi. 1987. “Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling of Asymmetric Proximities.” Behaviormetrika 14 (21): 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, Letizia, Nicole Ruta, and Marco Bertamini. 2015. “Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.” PloS one 10 (10): e0140043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penacchio, Olivier, Xavier Otazu, and Laura Dempere-Marco. 2013. “A Neurodynamical Model of Brightness Induction in v1.” PloS one 8 (5): e64086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penacchio, Olivier, and Arnold J. Wilkins. 2015. “Visual Discomfort and the Spatial Distribution of Fourier Energy.” Vision Research 108: 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penacchio, Olivier, Arnold J. Wilkins, Xavier Otazu, and Julie M. Harris. 2016, August. “Inhibitory function and its contribution to cortical hyperexcitability and visual discomfort as assessed by a computation model of cortical function.” In Perception 45, pp. 272–272. Olivers Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP, England: Sage Publications LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Piccolo, Domenico. 2006. “Observed Information Matrix for MUB Models.” Quaderni di Statistica 8: 33–78.
   Google Scholar
• Redies, Christoph. 2007. “A Universal Model of Esthetic Perception Based on the Sensory Coding of Natural Stimuli.” Spatial Vision 21 (1): 97–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaftoe, Henry. 2008. Convivial Urban Spaces: Creating Effective Public Places. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Shemesh, Avishag, Talmon Ronen, Karp Ofer, Amir Idan, Bar Moshe, and Jacob Yasha. 2017. “Affective response to architecture–investigating human reaction to spaces with different geometry.” Architectural Science Review 60: 116–125. doi:10.1080/00038628.2016.1266597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, Paul J., and Christopher M. Barona. 2009. “Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 27 (1): 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Louis H. 1896. “The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered.” Lippincott's Magazine 57 (3): 406.
   Google Scholar
• Talmon, Ronen, Stéphane Mallat, Hitten Zaveri, and Ronald R. Coifman. 2015. “Manifold Learning for Latent Variable Inference in Dynamical Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 63 (15): 3843–3856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, Oshin, Gorka Navarrete, Anjan Chatterjee, Lars Brorson Fich, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Mora, Helmut Leder, Cristián Modrono, Marcos Nadal, Nicolai Rostrup, and Martin Skov. 2015. “Architectural Design and the Brain: Effects of Ceiling Height and Perceived Enclosure on Beauty Judgments and Approach-Avoidance Decisions.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 41: 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, Oshin, Gorka Navarrete, Anjan Chatterjee, Lars Brorson Fich, Helmut Leder, Cristián Modroño, Marcos Nadal, Nicolai Rostrup, and Martin Skov. 2013. “Impact of Contour on Aesthetic Judgments and Approach-Avoidance Decisions in Architecture.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 2): 10446–10453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitruvius, Marcus Pollio. 1914. Translated by Morris, Hicky Morgan, Vitruvius: The Ten Books on Architecture. (De Architectura.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/20239/20239-h/20239-h.htm (Original work published 15 B.C.).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Francis Lloyd. 1958. The Living City. New York: Horizon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, Robert. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (2p2): 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, Robert. 2001. “Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal.” Current directions in psychological science 10 (6): 224–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. 2013. “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.” Jama, 310 (20): 2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Ting, and Hua Dong. ‘Human-centred design: an emergent conceptual model’, Include2009, Royal College of Art, April 8–10, 2009, London Include2009 proceedings (2009). Retrieved from: http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/2084/all/1/proceedings.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Zhaoping Li. 2002. “A saliency map in primary visual cortex.” Trends in cognitive sciences 6: 9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar