592
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Virtual vs. actual body: applicability of anthropomorphic avatars to enhance exploratory creativity in architectural design education

, &
Pages 520-527 | Received 02 Aug 2019, Accepted 16 Sep 2019, Published online: 11 Oct 2019

References

  • Amabile, T. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Boden, M. A. 2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. New York: Routledge.
  • Boden, M. A. 2010. Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chang, Y., Y. Chien, C. Lin, L. M. Chen, and H. Hsieh. 2016. “Effects of 3D Applications on the Design Creativity of Students with Different Representational Abilities.” Computers in Human Behavior 65: 107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.024
  • Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goldschmidt, G., and A. L. Sever. 2011. “Inspiring Design Ideas with Texts.” Design Studies 32 (2): 139–155. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006
  • Guegan, J., S. Buisine, F. Mantelet, and N. Maranzana. 2016. “Avatar-mediated Creativity: When Embodying Inventers Makes Engineers More Creative.” Computers in Human Behavior 61: 165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024
  • Heeter, C. 1992. “Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1: 120–126. doi: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
  • Hong, S., Y. Jeong, Y. E. Kalay, S. Jung, and J. Lee. 2016. “Enablers and Barriers of the Multi-user Virtual Environment for Exploratory Creativity in Architectural Design Collaboration.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 12: 151–170. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2015.1081239
  • Hong, S., and Y. Lee. 2019. “Behavioural Responsiveness of Virtual Users for Students’ Creative Problem-finding in Architectural Design.” Architectural Science Review 62: 238–247. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2019.1594673
  • Kalay, Y. E. 2004. Architecture’s New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer-aided Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kaufman, J. C., and R. A. Beghetto. 2009. “Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity.” Review of General Psychology 13: 1–12. doi: 10.1037/a0013688
  • Kohler, T., J. Fueller, D. Stieger, and K. Matzler. 2011. “Avatar-based Innovation: Consequences of the Virtual Co-creation Experience.” Computers in Human Behavior 27: 160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.019
  • Larach, D. U., and J. F. Cabra. 2010. “Creative Problem Solving in Second Life: An Action Research Study.” Creativity and Innovation Management 19: 167–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00550.x
  • Mannell, S. 2006. “Architectural Reenactments at 1:1 Scale.” Journal of Architectural Education 60: 29–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1531-314X.2006.00077.x
  • McCullogh, M. 1998. Abstracting Craft: The Practical Digital Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Norman, D. A. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.
  • Paletz, S. B. F., and K. Peng. 2009. “Problem Finding and Contradiction: Examining the Relationship between Naïve Dialectical Thinking, Ethnicity, and Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 21: 139–151. doi: 10.1080/10400410902858683
  • Rittel, H. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
  • Schuemie, M. J., P. van der Straaten, M. Krijn, and C. van der Mast. 2001. “Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey.” CyberPychology & Behavior 4: 183–203. doi: 10.1089/109493101300117884
  • Slater, M., and S. Wilbur. 1997. “A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculation on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6: 603–616. doi: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
  • Tavernor, R. 2002. “Measure, Metre, Irony: Reuniting Pure Mathematics with Architecture.” Architectural Research Quarterly 6: 67–54. doi: 10.1017/S1359135502001483
  • Tisi, R. 2008. “B+S+P+T+PL+M.” Journal of Architectural Education 61: 69–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1531-314X.2008.00189.x
  • Wraga, M., C. M. Flynn, H. K. Boyle, and G. C. Evans. 2009. “Effects of a Body-oriented Response Measure on the Neural Substrate of Imagined Perspective Rotations.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 1782–1793. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21319

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.