Revisiting the plastic number theory from the perspective of perceptual psychology

References

• Aarts, Jan, Robbert Fokkink, and Godfried Kruijtzer. 2001. “Morphic Numbers.” NAW 5/2 (2): 56–58.
   Google Scholar
• Appelle, Stuart, and Jacqueline J. Goodnow. 1970. “Haptic and Visual Perception of Proportion.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1): 47–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Appelle, Stuart, Frederick Gravetter, and Philip W. Davidson. 1980. “Proportion Judgments in Haptic and Visual Form Perception.” Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie 34 (2): 161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, John C., and Elliot Noma. 1978. Fundamentals of Scaling and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Jacob. 1966. “Perceptual Grouping Produced by Changes in Orientation and Shape.” Science 154 (3748): 538–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Jacob. 1967. “Perceptual Grouping Produced by Line Figures.” Perception & Psychophysics 2 (11): 491–495.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Av, Mercedes Barchilon, and Dov Sagi. 1995. “Perceptual Grouping by Similarity and Proximity: Experimental Results Can Be Predicted by Intensity Autocorrelations.” Vision Research 35 (6): 853–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Joseph L. 2014. Traditional and New Principles of Perceptual Grouping. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner, Gustav. 1860. Elements of Psychophysics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlenga, Alberto, and Verde Paola. 2000. Dom Hans Van der Laan. Le opere e gli scritti. Milan: Electa.
   Google Scholar
• Graatsma, William, and Naalden Jos. 1982. Architectuur modellen en meubels. Een tentoonstelling ontworpen door Hans van der Laan. 1904–1991. Lemiers: Abdij St. Benedictusberg.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdom, Frederick A.A., and Nicolaas Prins. 2016. Psychophysics. A Practical Introduction. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kruijtzer, Godfried. 1998. Ruimte en getal: Het plastische getal en het gulden snedegetal : wiskunde in de bouwkunde–bouwkunde in de wiskunde. Amsterdam: Architectura & Natura.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. J. 2005. “The Visual Computation of 2-D Area by Human Observers.” Vision Research 45 (19): 2564–2570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachmias, Jacob. 2008. “Judging Spatial Properties of Simple Figures.” Vision Research 48 (11): 1290–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, David. 2011. The Sisters of the Golden Section.” Perception 40 (6): 705–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, Richard K., and Fred Attneave. 1970. “What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping?” The American Journal of Psychology 83 (1): 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padovan, Richard. 1994. Dom Hans Van Der Laan. Modern, Primitive. Amsterdam: Architectura & Natura.
   Google Scholar
• Padovan, Richard. 2002. “Dom Hans Van Der Laan and the Plastic Number.” Nexus Network Journal 4 (3): 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Padovan, Richard. 2015. “Dom Hans van Der Laan and the Plastic Number.” In Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future, edited by Kim Williams, and Michael J. Ostwald, 407–419. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Proietti, Tiziana. 2015. Ordine e Proporzione. Dom Hans van Der Laan e l’espressività dello Spazio Architettonico. Macerata: Quodlibet.
   Google Scholar
• Proietti, Tiziana, and Gepshtein Sergei. 2020. “Appraising the role of architectural proportion from a psychophysical perspective.” Paper presented at meeting of the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture ANFA, La Jolla, September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, David, and Stanley Hamstra. 1991. “Shape Discrimination for Motion-Defined and Contrast-Defined Form: Squareness Is Special.” Perception 20 (3): 315–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, David, and Stanley Hamstra. 1992. “Shape Discrimination of Perfect Symmetry: Dissociation of Shape from Size.” Vision Research 32 (10): 1845–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remery, Michel. 2010. Mystery and Matter: On the Relationship between Liturgy and Architecture in the Thought of Dom Hans Van der Laan Osb (1904-1991). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Ian. 1996. “Tales of a Neglected Number.” Scientific American 274 (6): 102–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Laan, Hans. 1960. Le Nombre Plastique. Quinze lecons sur l’ordonnance architectonique. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Laan, Hans. (1977)1983. Architectonic Space: Fifteen Lessons on the Disposition of the Human Habitat. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Voet, Caroline. 2016. “Between Looking and Making: Unravelling Dom Hans van Der Laan’s Plastic Number.” Architectural Histories 4 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, Max. (1923) 1938. “Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms.” In A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, edited by Willis D. Ellis, 71–88. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company.
   Google Scholar