References
- Barrett, T. (1993). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield.
- Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Dugund, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
- Cohen, D.K., McLaughlin, M.W., & Talberts, J. E. (Eds) (1993). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Efland, A. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134–153.
- Gardner, H., & Boix-Masilla (1994). Teaching for understanding—within and across the disciplines. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 14–18.
- Getzels, J.W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Koroscik, J.S. (1990). Novice-expert differences in understanding and misunderstanding and their implications for student assessment in art education. Arts and Learning Research, 8(1), 6–29.
- Koroscik, J.S. (1993). Learning in the visual arts: Implications for preparing art teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 94(5), 20–25.
- Kuspit, D. (1992). The horse in the industrial age: Deborah Butterfield's sculptures. Catalogue essay in Horses: The Art of Deborah Butterfield, (pp. 57–72). Coral Gables, FL: Lowe Art Museum, University of Miami.
- Perkins, D., & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 4–7.
- Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (1988). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 22–32.
- Prawat, R. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy and disposition. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 1–41.
- Walker, S.R. (1996). Thinking strategies for interpreting artworks. Studies in art Education, 37(2), 80–91.
- Wilson, B. (March/April 1986). Re-creating versus creating. Design for Arts in Education, 7–10.