Under Construction: Images of the Child in Art Teacher EducationFootnote¹

¹An earlier version of this paper was presented as part of the panel, “Is development still relevant?,” at the conference of the National Art Education Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, April 4, 2003.

References

• Cannella, G. S. (2002). Global perspectives, cultural studies, and the construction of a postmodern childhood studies. In G. S. Cannella & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Kidworld: Childhood studies, global perspectives, and education (pp. 1–18). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, K. L. (1997). Action research and preservice teachers. Art Education, 50(5), 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. & James, A. (Eds.) (2000). Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetti, A. (2001). Conversation with a group of teachers. In Project Zero and Reggio Children (Eds.), Making learning risible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 116–135). Cambridge, MA & Reggio Emilia, Italy: Project Zero & Reggio Children.
   Google Scholar
• Golomb, C. (1992). The child's creation of a pictorial world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graue, M. E. & Walsh, D. J. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers, C. (1993). A survey of instructors of art methods classes for preservice elementary teachers. Studies in Art Education, 34(4), 233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Malaguzzi, L. (1993, November). Koran education based on relationships (Lella Gandini, trans.). Young Children, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Morss, J. R. (1996). Growing critical: Alternatives to developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O'Kane, (2000). The development of participatory techniques: Facilitating children's views about decisions which affect them. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 136–159). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. (1987). How we understand art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Project Zero and Reggio Children (Eds.) (2001). Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners. Cambridge, MA & Reggio Emilia, Italy: Project Zero & Reggio Children.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship? In Project Zero & Reggio Children (Eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 78–89). Cambridge, MA & Reggio Emilia, Italy: Project Zero & Reggio Children.
   Google Scholar
• Rubizzi, (2001). Documenting the documenter. In Project Zero & Reggio Children (Eds.), Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners (pp. 94–115). Cambridge, MA & Reggio Emilia, Italy: Project Zero & Reggio Children.
   Google Scholar
• Stremmel, A. (2002). The cultural construction of childhood: United States and Reggio perspectives. In V. R. Fu, A. J. Stremmel, & L. T. Hill (Eds.), Teaching and learning: Collaborative exploration of the Reggio Emilia approach (pp. 37–49). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, P. (2003). Reflections on the image of the child: Reproducer or creator of culture? Art Education, 56(4), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. & Bresler, L. (2002). Development interlude. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children's lives: Context, culture, and curriculum (pp. 87–92). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1991). The fact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. J. (1998). Interpretive science. In M. E. Graue & D. J. Walsh (Eds.), Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics (pp. 16–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (1997). Child art, multiple interpretations, and conflicts of interest. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art (pp. 81–94). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhead, M. & Faulkner, D. (2000). Subjects, objects or participants? Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 9–35). London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar