Shifting the Curriculum: Decentralization in the Art Education Experience

References

• Adejumo, C. (2002). Five ways to improve the teaching and understanding of art in the schools. Art Education, 55(5), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, T. (1996/2005). Spinning inspirited images in the midst of planned and live(d) curricula. In W. Pinar & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected words of Ted T. Aoki (pp. 414–423). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. (1999). The radical impossibility of teaching. A revised version of a presentation given to the Federation Internationale des Sciences Sociales, in Milan, Italy, in 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Schwarte, A., Alkire, K., Adkinson, P., Rosichelli, M., & Kallish, A. (2007). Social networking for learning communities: Using e-portfolios, blogs, wikis, pod casts, and other internet-based tools in the foundation art studio. FATE in Review (Foundations in Art: Theory & Education), 29. Retrieved from www.asu.edu/cfa/art/people/faculty/collins/Collinswriting.html
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2008). Engaging minds: Changing teaching in complex times (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134–153.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. (2004). Interaction of teachers and curriculum. In E. W. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education, (pp. 467–486). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (2004). Curriculum change for the 21st century: Visual culture in art education. In E. W. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education, (pp. 815–828). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (in press). Revenge of the ‘neurds’: Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creativity Research Journal. Retrieved from www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/liane/papers/neurds.htm
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In (T. Hewett & T. Kavanagh, Eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition, October 13-16, Loughborough University, UK, pp. 126–133. Retrieved from www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/liane/papers/CandC/cm.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kent, L. (2005). Studio conversation: Approaches for postmodern context. Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(2), 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrandt, M., Felts, J., Richards, B., & Abghari, N. (2004). Teaching-to-learn: A constructivist approach to shared responsibility. Art Education, 57(5), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum: Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Short, G. (1998). The high school studio curriculum and art understanding: An examination. Studies in Art Education, 40(1), 46–65.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, P. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G. (1999). The hermeneutic imagination and the pedagogic text. Pedagon: Interdisciplinary Essays in the Human Sciences, Pedagogy and Culture, (pp. 27–44). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeny, R. (2004). Lines of sight in the ‘network society’: Simulation, art education, and digital visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeny, R. (2008). Unthinkable Complexity: Art Education in the Network Society. In M. Alexenberg (Ed.), Educating Artists for the Future: Learning at the Intersections of Art, Science, Technology and Culture, (pp. 85–101). Chicago, IL: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2008). Brave new world of digital intimacy. New York Times, September 7, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2002). How teachers use computers in instructional practice—Four examples in American schools. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 18(6), 687–699.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2004). Open minds and a sense of adventure: How teachers of art and design approach technology, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23(2), 179–1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar