References
- Barrett, T. (2003). Interpreting art: Reflecting, wondering and responding. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
- Bastos, F. (2010). Editorial: New media art education. Art Education, 4–5.
- Buffington, M. (2008). Creating and consuming web 2.0 in art education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 303–313.
- Carpenter, B. S. (2005). The return of visual culture. Art Education, 58(6), 4–5.
- Carpenter, B. S. (2008). From maps to tangled webs: A brief reflection on multilinear thematic curriculum design in professional development workshops and higher education courses. Trends, 27–31.
- Carpenter, B. S., & Taylor, P. G. (2003). Racing thoughts: Altering our ways of knowing and being through computer hypertext. Studies in Art Education, 45(1), 40–55.
- Carpenter, B. S., & Taylor, P. G. (2009). You’ve got to see this: Looking back on/forward from on-line hypermediated art criticism and collaborative digital technology. In T. Kidd & I. Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: An educator’s guide to web 2.0. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 215–232.
- Cifuentes, L., Carpenter, B. S., & Bulu, S. (2006). An online collaborative environment for sharing visual culture. Journal of Visual Literacy, 26(2), 45–62.
- Cifuentes, L., & Dylak, S. (2007). Trigger visuals for cross-cultural online learning. The International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 17(2/3), 121–137.
- Cifuentes, L., Myers, L. J., & Mcintosh K. (1998). Selective data analyses, photo manipulation, and stylistic embellishment for honest message design. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18(2), 165–174.
- Cifuentes, L., & Ozel, S. (2006). Resources for attending to the needs of multicultural learners. Knowledge Quest, 35(2), 12–19.
- Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visual in training materials. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education; quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93–106.
- Cyrs, T. E., & Conway, E. D. (1997). Teaching at a distance with merging technologies; An instructional systems approach. Las Cruces, NM: Center for Educational Development.
- Darts, D. (2004). Visual culture jam: Art, pedagogy and creative resistance. Studies in Art Education, 45(4), 313–327.
- Ettinger, L. (1988). Art education and computing: Building a perspective. Studies in Art Education, 30(1), 53–62.
- Gregory, D. (1996). Art education reform: Technology as savior. Art Education, 49(6), 49–54.
- Godwin-Jones, R. (2006). Emerging technologies: Tag clouds in the blogosphere: Electronic literacy and social networking. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 8–15.
- Hall, E. T. (1990). The silent language. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
- Heise, D., & Grandgenett, N. F. (1996). Perspectives on the use of internet in art classrooms. Art Education, 49(6), 12–18.
- Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Keifer-Boyd, K. T. (1996). Interfacing hypermedia and the internet with critical inquiry in the arts: Preservice training. Art Education, 49(6), 33–41.
- Lohr, L. (2008). Creating graphics for learning and performance: Lessons in visual literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
- Mercedes, D. (1996). Digital ethics: Computers, photographs, and the manipulation of pixels. Art Education, 49(3), 44–50.
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Milekic, S. (2000). Designing digital environments for art education/exploration. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 51(1), 49–56.
- Mirzoeff, N. (2009). An introduction to visual culture (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Prater, M. (2001). Constructivism and technology in art education. Art Education, 54(6), 43–48.
- Resta, P., & Therese, L. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83.
- Roland, C. (1990). Our love affair with new technology: Is the honeymoon over? Art Education, 43(3), 54–60.
- Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
- Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0 new tools, new schools. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
- Stokrocki, M. (2007). Art education avatars in cyberspace: Research in computer-based technology and visual arts education. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook for research in the arts, Part II (pp. 1861–1380). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Storti, C. (1997). Culture matters: The Peace Corps cross-cultural workbook. Washington, DC: Peace Corps Information Collection and Exchange.
- Sweeny, R. W. (2004). Lines of sight in the “network society”: Simulation, art education, and a digital visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 74–87.
- Sweeny, R. (2005). Three funerals and a wedding: Simulation, art education, and an aesthetics of cloning. Visual Arts Research, 31(61).
- Taylor, P. G., & Carpenter, B. S. (2002). Inventively linking: Teaching and learning with computer hypertext. Art Education, 55(4), 6–12.
- Taylor, P. G., & Carpenter, B. S. (2007). Hypermediated art criticism. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 41(3), 1–24.