Creativity in Digital Art Education Teaching Practices

References

• Assey, J. (1999). The future of technology in K-12 arts education. Forum on Technology in Education. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2002). Topsy-turvy teacher-student relationships: An examination of digital multimedia teaching and learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2006). Displacing student-teacher equilibrium in virtual learning environments. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments: Vol. 1 (pp. 497–524). USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., & Smith, K. (2006). Digital reflections: A late January cyberChat about “our gallery of the poetic moving image." In P. Duncum (Ed.), Visual culture in the art class: Case studies (pp. 160–171). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., Davidson, M., & Mullen, C. (2007). Turning the clock “back to the future:" Some new media approaches to art education. Canadian Art Teacher, 6(1), 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2009a). Necessity is the mother of invention: Changing power dynamics between teachers and students in wired art classrooms. Canadian Review of Art Education, 36, 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2009b). Case study research: Three model visual arts new media programs in Canadian secondary schools. Journal on Education, Informatics and Cybernetics, 1(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, D. (2005). From fine art to visual culture: Assessment and the changing role of art education. International Journal of Education through Art, 1(3) 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, K. (2006). Digital applications in elementary visual arts: A case study in Ontario and Newfoundland schools. Canadian Review of Art Education, 33(1), 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, K. (2008a). Art as transformation. In M. Gardner & U. Kelly (Eds.), Narrating transformative learning in education (pp. 211–221). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmilllan.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, K. (2008b). Kathy Browning’s digital photography profiled. In F. Blaikie (Ed.), Canadian art/works: A resource for primary, junior, intermediate, and senior teachers (pp. 38–40; 127-131). Victoria BC: Canadian Society for Education Through Art.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, K. (2009). Kathy Browning’s digital photography profiled. In J. Butler (Ed), The Willisville Mountain Project (pp. 40–41). Willisville, ON: Willisville Mountain Project Collective.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, K. (2011). Digital applications in intermediate/senior visual arts education. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. B., & Taylor, P. G. (2007). Mediating art education: Digital kids, art, and technology. Visual Arts Research, 65, 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Coufal, K., & Grandgenett, N. F. (1997). The community discovered: The search for meaning. Omaha, NE: Westside Community Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Degennaro, A., & Mak, B. (2002-2003). A diffusion model for computer art in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Delacruz, E. (2004). Teachers’ working conditions and the unmet promise of technology. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Delacruz, E. (2009a). Art education aims in the age of new media: Moving toward global civil society. Art Education, 62(5), 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Delacruz, E. (2009b). From bricks and mortar to the public sphere in cyberspace: Creating a culture of caring on the digital global commons. International Journal of Education in the Arts, 10(5). Retrieved from www.ijea.org/v10n5/v10n5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, L., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2004). Visual culture isn’t just visual: Multiliteracy, multimodality and meaning. Studies in Art Education, 45(3), 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. 1996). More integrated interactive technology and art education. Art Education, 49(6), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dylan, B. (1964). The times they are a-changin’. (Title track.) [Record]. New York, NY: Columbia Records.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, A., & Bamford, A. (2007). Manipulation, simulation, stimulation: The role of art education in the digital age. International Journal of Education through Art, 3(2), 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Grabove, V. (1997). The many faces of transformative learning theory and practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice (pp. 89–96). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greb, D. (1997). New technologies in the classroom. In D. C. Gregory (Ed.), New technologies in art education: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 13–21). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. (2009). Boxes with fire: Wisely integrating learning technologies into the art classroom. Art Education, 62(3), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gouzouasis, P. (2001). The role of the arts in new media and Canadian education for the 21st century. Education Canada, 41(2), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2007). Principles of possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century art & culture curriculum. Art Education, 60(1), 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. L. (1962). The course in creative marketing strategy at Harvard Business School. In J. S. Parnes & H. F. Harding (Eds.), A sourcebook for creative thinking (pp. 325–333). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, D., & Grandgenett, N. F. (1996). Perspectives on the use of Internet in art classroom. Art Education, 49(6), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. A. (1999). Ontological shifts in studio art education: Emergent pedagogical models. Art Journal, 58(1), 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagodzinski, J. (2009). Remember just: “Art you ‘there’ wherever ‘you’ are?" Canadian Art Teacher, 8(1), 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (2004). Editorial: Leadership and research: Reimagining electronic technologies for supporting learning through the visual arts. Studies in Art Education. 46(1), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lebo, M. (1992). An examination of technology in the art classroom: An annotated bibliography. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2006, Winter). Leadership for technology integration: Computing the reality. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 212–224.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Li-Fen. (2005). Preservice art teacher negative attitudes and perceptions of computer-generated art imagery: Recommendations for preservice art education programs. Visual Arts Research, 31(1), (Issue 60), 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Maddux, C. (2003). Twenty years of research in information technology in education: Assessing our progress. Computers in Schools, 20(1/2), 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, S. (2007, May). Implications for art education in the third millennium: Art technology integration. Art Education, 60(3), 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nisenholt, M. (2007). Picturing paradox. Profiling artist Kathy Browning’s art: Images on icebergs and art educator including digital photography student exemplars. Canadian Art Teacher, 6(1).
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (2009). The Ontario curriculum: The arts, Grades 1-8: The arts. Toronto: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, P. (2004). Technology and Art Education: What do we really know about it? NAEA Advisory, Spring 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, E. (1990). Toward a theory of creative potential. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1962). Toward a theory of creativity. In J. S. Parnes & H. F. Harding (Eds.), A sourcebook for creative thinking (pp. 63–73). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. L. (1999). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar
• Sabol, R.F. (2010). Summary of findings from NCLB: A study of its impact upon art education programs. (Research Report Summary). Retrieved from www.arteducators.org/research/nclb
   Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz, M. (2004). Commentary: Notions of technology and visual literacy. Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the Net Generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (2007). Mediating art education; Digital kids, art and technology. Visual Arts Research, 22(65), 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wesch, M. (Writer and Producer). (2007). The machine is us/ing us [Video]. Available from www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0E0
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E. (1994). Concerns of preservice art teachers and those who prepare them to teach. Art Education, 47(5), 59–67.
   Google Scholar