Creating Meaningful Art Experiences with Assistive Technology for Students with Physical, Visual, Severe, and Multiple Disabilities

References

• Alberto, P. A., & Waugh, R. E. (2009). Learning and behavioral characteristics of students with significant disabilities. In K. W. Heller, P. E. Forney, P. A. Alberto, S. J. Best & M. N. Schwartzman (Eds.), Understanding physical, health, and multiple disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 35–50). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2003). Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(1), 93–113. doi: 10.1080/13603110701284656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. B. (2011). Successful implementation of assistive technology to promote access to curriculum and instruction for students with physical disabilities. In Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 30(2), 2–22.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. B. (2012). Technology spotlight: Art adaptations for students with physical disabilities. Newsletter of the Division for Physical and Health Disabilities, 30(2), 14–22. Arlington, VA: Division for Physical and Health Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. B., Cramer, E. S., Park, Y., Bell, S. M., & Cole, J. (in review). Art educators’ knowledge, attitudes, and experiences working with students who have physical, visual, severe, and multiple disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. B., & Heller, K. W. (2009). Assistive technology considerations. In K. W. Heller, P. E. Forney, P. A. Alberto, S. J. Best & M. N. Swartzman (Eds.), Understanding Physical, Health, and Multiple Disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. B., & Heller, K. W. (2013). Effective practices for promoting literacy with individuals who have physical disabilities. In R. A. McWilliam, B. G. Cook & M. Tankersley (Eds.), Research-Based Strategies for Improving Outcomes for Targeted Groups of Learners, pp. 409–422. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., Polgar, J. M., & Hussey, S. M. (2008). Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. B., & Giangreco, M. (2013). Guiding principles for including high school students with intellectual disabilities in general education classes. American Secondary Education, 42(1), 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Kroener, J. (2013). High-quality supports for students with disabilities. Principal Leadership, 14(3), 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, B. L., & Guay, D. M. (Eds.). (2006). Reaching and teaching students with special needs through art. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, B. L., & Kellman, J. (2010). Understanding students with autism through art. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, D. (2006). Special needs students in the art room: a journey. In B. L Gerber & D. M. Guay (Eds.), Reaching and teaching students with special needs through art. (pp. 3–14). Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. W. (2009). Learning and behavioral characteristics of students with physical, health, or multiple disabilities. In K. W. Heller, P. E. Forney, P. A. Alberto, S. J. Best & M. N. Swartzman (Eds.), Understanding Physical, Health, and Multiple Disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 18–34). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. W., & Coleman, M. B. (2009). Classroom adaptations for students with physical, health, and multiple disabilities. In K. W. Heller, P. E. Forney, P. A. Alberto, S. J. Best & M. N. Schwartzman (Eds.), Understanding Physical, Health, and Multiple Disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 219–230). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A. (2000) Touch, Representation and Blindness. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A., Brackett, D. D., & Scroggs, E. (2002) Tangible picture matching by people who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(5), 349–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Parker, A. T., Smith, D. W., & Griffin-Shirley, N. (2011). Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: Challenges and needs in teachers’ preparation programs and practice. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(4), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 23(3), 204–216. doi: 10.1080/07434610701553635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loesl, S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on art therapy in the schools: Art therapy + schools + students = ? Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 27(2), 54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Loesl, S. (2012). The adaptive art specialist: An integral part of a student’s access to art. In The intersection of arts education and special education: Exemplary programs and approaches (pp. 47–68). Washington, DC: International Organization on Arts and Disability.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman, A. L., & Jenkins, A. M. (Eds.). (1999). Issues and approaches to art for students with special needs. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. R., & Foley, B. (1992). “If you can move your head, you can move your world”… Accessing the arts through assistive technology. Arts & Activities, 111, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, P., Lavoie, R. D., Eagle Hill School Outreach, Peter Rosen Productions, & PBS Video. (2004). How difficult can this be?: Understanding learning disabilities: frustration, anxiety, tension, the F.A.T. city workshop. Alexandria, VA: Artwork PBS.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, C. M., & Chao, H. Y. (2010). Ink and wash painting for children with visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 28(2), 157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Strangman, N., & Dalton, B. (2005). Technology for struggling readers: A review of the research. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), The handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 545–569). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
   Google Scholar
• Székely, G. (2010). Supermarket artists. Arts & Activities, 147(3), (46–47).
   Google Scholar
• Van Tubbergen, M., Omichinski, D., & Warschausky, S. (2007). Choice making part I: How children with severe disabilities make choices of preference and knowledge. Exceptional Parent, 37(5), 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Vize, A. (2005). Making art activities work for students with special needs. Arts & Activities, 138(4), 17, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Zederayko, M. W., & Ward, K. (1999). What to do when students can’t hold a pencil. Art Education, 52(4), 18–22.
   Google Scholar