References
- Check, E. (2000). Caught between control and creativity: Boredom strikes the art room. In D. E. Fehr, K. Fehr, & K. Keifer-Boyd (Eds.), Real world readings in art education: Things your professors never told you (pp. 137-145). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Door, V. (2014). Critical pedagogy and reflexivity: The issue of ethical consistency. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 5(2), 88-99.
- Hochtritt, L., Thulson, A., Delaney, R., Dornbush, T., & Shay, S. (2014). Theory loves practice: A teacher researcher group. Art Education, 67(5), 12-22.
- Pelo, A. (2014). Finding the questions worth asking. Exchange, (215), 50-53.
- Rinaldi, C. (2004). The relationship between documentation and assessment. The Quarterly Periodical of the North American Reggio Emilia Alliance, 11(1), 1-4.
- Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia; Listening, researching and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Stacey, S. (2009). Emergent curriculum in early childhood settings: From theory to practice. St. Paul, MN: Red Leaf Press.
- Svinicki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2010). McKeachies teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Thompson, C. M. (2005). The ket aesthetic: Visual culture in childhood. International Journal of Art Education, 3(1), 68-85.
- Thompson, C. M. (2009). Mira! Looking, listening, and lingering in research with children. Visual Arts Research. 35(1), 24-34.
- Walker, S. (2014). A mutual reshaping: Theory and practice. Studies in Art Education, 55(4), 79-83.
- Wein, C. A. (2014). The power of emergent curriculum: Stories from early childhood settings. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.