Interpreting Visual Semiotics With the Music Video Man in the Mirror in Art Education

References

• Austerlitz, S. (2008). Money for nothing: A history of the music video from the Beatles to the White Stripes. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, T. (1994). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, R., & Freedman, K. (1992). Responding as a cultural act: Adolescents' responses to magazine ads and short stories. In J. Many & C. Cox (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research and practice (pp. 162–188). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2004). Culture and language learning: Teaching, research and scholarship. Language Teaching, 37(3), 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2004). Visual culture isn't just visual: Multiliteracy, multimodality, and meaning. Studies in Art Education, 43(3), 252–265.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faudree P. (2012). Music, language, and texts: Sound and semiotic ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei, L. V. (2004). Developing an integrative multi-semiotic model. In K. L. O'Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic-functional perspectives. London, England, & New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K., & Wood, J. (1999). Reconsidering critical response: Student judgments of purpose, interpretation, and relationships in visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 40(2), 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2007). Principles of possibility: Toward an art and culture curriculum. Art Education, 60(1), 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London, England: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2014). Enacting critical media literacy with machinima making: Body<self-referentialorganization>Landmark. In M. Stokrocki (Ed), Exploration in virtual worlds: New digital multimedia literacy investigations for art education (pp. 105–112). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2011). Discourse analysis and education: A multimodal social semiotic approach. In K. L. O'Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 205–226). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lalitte, P. (2006). Towards a semiotic model of mixed music analysis. Organised Sound, 11(2), 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L. (2008). Art café: A 3D virtual learning environment for art education. Art Education, 61(6), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran, K. (2004). Visual semiosis in film. In K. L. O'Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic-functional perspectives (pp. 109–131). London, England, & New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Riddle, J. (2009). Engaging the eye generation: Visual literacy strategies for the K-5 classroom. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, P. (1987). Musicology and the semiotics of popular music. Semiotica, 66(1-3), 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillander, M. (2011). Creativity, technology, art, and pedagogical practices. Art Education, 64(1), 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ventola, E., & Guijarro, A. J. M. (2009). The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wignell, P. (2011). Picture books for young children of different ages: The changing relationships between images and words. In K. L. O'Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar