http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1324-3349
References
- Coleman, M. B., & Cramer, E. S. (2015). Creating meaningful art experiences with assistive technology for students with physical, visual, severe, and multiple disabilities. Art Education, 68(2), 6–13.
- Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Cuban, L. (2018). The flight of a butterfly or the path of a bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Foley, A., & Ferri, B. A. (2012). Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 192–200.
- Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609.
- Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2000). Computers as cognitive media: examining the potential of computers in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(5), 537–552.
- Knochel, A. D., & Patton, R. M. (2015). If art education then critical digital making: Computational thinking and creative code. Studies in Art Education, 57(1), 21–38.
- Lialina, O. (2012). Turing complete user [Blog]. Retrieved from http://contemporary-home-computing.org/turing-complete-user
- Lialina, O. (2018). Once again, the doorknob: On affordance, forgiveness and ambiguity in human computer and human robot interaction [Blog]. Retrieved from http://contemporary-home-computing.org/affordance
- LivabilityUK. (2014, November 24). SHIVA project [Video file]. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tAqCvI2Xzg
- McCord, K., & Malley, S. M. (2017). The impact of technology innovations at the intersection of arts education and special education. In J. B. Crocket & S. M. Malley (Eds.), Handbook of arts education and special education: Policy, research, and practices (1st ed., pp. 313–331). London, UK: Routledge.
- McEwen, R., Zbitnew, A., & Chatsick, J. (2016). Through the lens of a tetrad: Visual storytelling on tablets. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 100–112.
- McLoughlin, L., Fryazinov, O., Moseley, M., Sanchez, M., Adzhiev, V., Comninos, P., & Pasko, A. (2016). Virtual sculpting and 3D printing for young people with disabilities. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 36(1), 22–28.
- Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
- Patton, R. M., & Meeken, L. (2017). Staying current: Developing digital literacies for the creative classroom. In M. Filimowicz & V. Tzankova (Eds.), Teaching computational creativity (pp. 21–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Quinlan, M. M., Bates, B. R., & Angell, M. E. (2012). “What can I do to help?” Postsecondary students with learning disabilities’ perceptions of instructors’ classroom accommodations. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(4), 224–233.
- Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or be programmed: Ten commands for a digital age. New York, NY: OR Books.
- Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(4).
- Young, G. C. (2008). Autonomy of artistic expression for adult learners with disabilities. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(2), 116–123.