The image as trans-form and transformation: Exploring ‘the symptom’ of aberrant images in District 9 (Neill Blomkamp, 2009)

References

• Anon. Internet Movie Database: District 9. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/ (accessed 24 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1984. Rabelais and his world. 2nd edition. Trans. H. Iswolsky. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belting, H. 2005. Image, medium, body: A new approach to iconology. Critical Inquiry 31(2): 302–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belting, H. 2011. An anthropology of images: Picture, medium, body. 2nd edition. Trans. T. Dunlap. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, N. 2009. District 9. DVD. Sony Pictures and NuMetro. (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P-xT3bTqUA for clip which is discussed in this article.)
   Google Scholar
• Braudy, L. and M. Cohen, eds. 2004. Film theory & criticism. 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bredekamp, H. 2010. Theorie des Bildakts. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Buñuel, L. and S. Dali. 1929. Un Chien Andalou. DVD. Les Grands Films Classiques.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 2003. The grotesque today: Preliminary notes towards a taxonomy. In Modern art and the grotesque, ed. F.S. Connelly, 291–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F.S., ed. 2003. Modern art and the grotesque. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creed, B. 1986. Horror and the monstrous-feminine: An imaginary abjection. Screen 27(1): 44–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creed, B. 1993. The monstrous-feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cronenberg, D. 1986. The Fly. DVD. 20th Century Fox.
   Google Scholar
• Didi-Huberman, G. 1989. The art of not describing: Vermeer—the detail and the patch. History of the Human Sciences 2(2): 135–169.
   Google Scholar
• Didi-Huberman, G. 2003. The invention of hysteria: Charcot and the photographic iconography of the Salpêtrière. 2nd edition. Trans. A. Krantz. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Didi-Huberman, G. 2005. Confronting images: Questioning the ends of a certain history of art. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Didi-Huberman, G. 2008. Images in spite of all: Four photographs from Auschwitz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figlerowicz, M. 2012. Affect theory dossier: An introduction. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences 20(2): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1913 [2010]. The interpretation of dreams (online edition). New York: Bartleby. http://www.bartleby.com/285/ (accessed 10 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1919 [1955 reprint]. ‘The ‘uncanny’.” In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 17, ed. and Trans. J. Strachey et al., 217–256. London: Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Harpham, G. 2006. On the grotesque: Strategies of contradiction in art and literature. 2nd edition. Aurora: Davies Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jentsch, E. 1906. On the psychology of the uncanny. Trans. R. Sellars. Angelaki 2(1): 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kapstein, H. 2014. The hysterics of District 9. English Studies in Canada 40(1): 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, W. 1981. The grotesque in art and literature. 2nd edition. Trans. U. Weisstein. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J. 1982. The powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Trans. L.S. Roudiez. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. 1973 [2004]. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In Film theory & criticism, ed. L. Braudy and M. Cohen, 833–844. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, L. 2006. Death 24× a second: Stillness and the moving image. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nel, A. 2012. The repugnant appeal of the abject: Cityscape and cinematic corporality in District 9. Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies 26(4): 547–569.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, M. 1995. The female grotesque: Risk, excess and modernity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, D. 2003. The archaeology of the modern grotesque. In Modern art and the grotesque, ed. F.S. Connelly, 20–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J.M. 2006. Managing the monstrous feminine: Regulating the reproductive body. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J.M. 2012. The madness of women: Myth and experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Oever, A. 2009/2010. Monstration and the monstrous: The grotesque in the very beginning and at the very end. In Proceedings of the XVI International Film Studies Conference, Permanent Seminar on History of Film Theories. In the very beginning, at the very end: Film theories in perspective forum, ed. F. Casetti and J. Gaines, 229–242. Italy: Udine.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Oever, A. 2010. Ostranenie, ‘The montage of attractions’ and early cinema's ‘properly irreducible alien quality’. In Ostranenie, ed. A. van den Oever, 33–58. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Oever, A. 2011. Sensitizing the viewer: The impact of new techniques and the art experience. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Veuren, M. 2012. Tooth and nail: Anxious bodies in Neill Blomkamp's District 9. Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies 28(4): 570–586.
   Google Scholar