Studying Neighborhoods Using Uncertain Data from the American Community Survey: A Contextual Approach

References

• Abbott, A. 1997. Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Social Forces 75 (4): 1149–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, M., P. A. Longley, A. D. Singleton, and C. Brunsdon. 2010. Towards real time geodemographics: Clustering algorithm performance for large multidimensional spatial databases. Transactions in GIS 14 (3): 283–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astone, N. M., and S. S. McLanahan. 1991. Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review 56 (3): 309–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, P., P. Brown, and S. Pemberton. 2008. Methods for the spatial targeting of urban policy in the UK. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 1 (2): 117–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bazuin, J. T., and J. C. Fraser. 2013. How the ACS gets it wrong: The story of the American Community Survey and a small, inner city neighborhood. Applied Geography 45:292–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckhusen, J., R. J. Florax, T. de Graaff, J. Poot, and B. Waldorf. 2013. Living and working in ethnic enclaves: English language proficiency of immigrants in US metropolitan areas. Papers in Regional Science 92 (2): 305–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, J. D., B. K. Finch, C. G. Ellison, D. R. Williams, and J. S. Jackson. 2001. Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42 (2): 151–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and N. R. Draper. 1987. Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. C. 1994. Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns ofon of the performance of geodemographic classifications. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 174 (1): 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K., and S. S. Rosenthal. 2009. Gentrification and neighborhood housing cycles: Will America's future downtowns be rich? The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (4): 725–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R. 2011. Determinants of transport mode choice: A comparison of Germany and the USA. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (4): 644–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citro, C. F., and G. Kalton. 2007. Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and challenges. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• City of Chicago. 2013. Crimes 2001–present. https://data.cityofchicago.org/Public-Safety/Crimes-2001-to-present/ (last accessed May 30, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cormode, G., and A. McGregor. 2008. Approximation algorithms for clustering uncertain data. In Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, 191–200. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, D. M., and ACM. Lleras-Muney. 2010. Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. Journal of Health Economics 29 (1): 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenhalt, A. 2012. The great inversion and the future of the American City. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri). 2013. Tapestry segmentation: Reference guide. http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/community-tapestry.pdf (last accessed 22 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. 2011. Cluster analysis. 5th ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record 1780 (1): 87–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, R. E., and G. F. Train. 1995. Aspects of survey and model-based postcensal estimation of income and poverty characteristics for states and counties. In Proceedings of the Government Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 154–59. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Election Commission (FEC). 2013. Contributions by individuals. http://www.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/ftp_download.shtml (last accessed May 20, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. J. 2003. The relative importance of income and race in determining residential outcomes in US urban areas, 1970–2000. Urban Affairs Review 38 (5): 669–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, R. G., and L. F. Katz. 2013. Achieving escape velocity: Neighborhood and school interventions to reduce persistent inequality. American Economic Review 103 (3): 232–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., M. G. Boarnet, R. Ewing, and R. E. Killingsworth. 2002. How the built environment affects physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23 (2): 64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, B. 2010. Once the American dream: Inner-ring suburbs of the metropolitan United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2011. Geographically weighted principal components analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 25 (10): 1717–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. J., P. Sleight, and R. J. Webber. 2005. Geodemographics, GIS and neighbourhood targeting. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2010. Social justice and the city. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2013. HUD USPS ZIP code crosswalk files. http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/usps_crosswalk.html (last accessed June 30, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Howden, L., and J. Meyer. 2011. Age and sex composition: 2010. Technical report, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L., and P. J. Rousseeuw. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, M. 2013. An evaluation of small area population estimation techniques using open access ancillary data. Geographical Analysis 45 (3): 324–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L., T. Slater, and E. K. Wyly. 2008. Gentrification. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R. 2013. The persistence of segregation in the 21st century metropolis. City & Community 12 (2): 160–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, P., R. J. Webber, and L. Chao. 2008. The UK geography of the e-society: A national classification. Environment and Planning A 40 (2): 362–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magidson, J., and J. K. Vermunt. 2002. Latent class models for clustering a comparison with k-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research 20:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Matsueda, R. L., and K. Heimer. 1987. Race, family structure, and delinquency: A test of differential association and social control theories. American Sociological Review 52:826–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. A. 2008. The salience of neighborhood: Some lessons from sociology. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34 (3): 257–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. 2007. Place-based versus people-based Geographic Information Science. Geography Compass 1 (3): 503–35.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, G., and M. Cooper. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50 (2): 159–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, L. E., J. L. Kiely, and G. Pappas. 1996. The effects of poverty, race, and family structure on U.S. children's health. American Journal of Public Health 86 (10): 1401–05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. 2012. The new geography of jobs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, F. 2012. An introduction to ACS statistical methods and lessons learned. Paper presented at the Measuring People in Place conference, Boulder, CO. http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/cupc/workshops/measuring_people_in_place/themes/theme1/navarro.pdf (last accessed June 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ngai, W. K., B. Kao, C. K. Chui, R. Cheng, M. Chau, and K. Y. Yip. 2006. Efficient clustering of uncertain data. In Data Mining, 2006. ICDM’06. Sixth International Conference, 436–45. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S., D. Cullingford, and A. Gillard. 1980. A critique of the national classifications of OPCS/PRAG. Town Planning Review 51 (4): 421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papas, M. A., A. J. Alberg, R. Ewing, K. J. Helzlsouer, T. L. Gary, and A. C. Klassen. 2007. The built environment and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews 29 (1): 129–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R., E. Burgess, and D. Roderick. 1925. The city. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, J., M. Gibin, P. Longley, P. Mateos, P. Atkinson, and D. Ashby. 2011. Geodemographics as a tool for targeting neighbourhoods in public health campaigns. Journal of Geographical Systems 13 (2): 173–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. T., S. H. Holan, C. K. Wikle, and N. Cressie 2014. Spatial Fay-Herriot models for small area estimation with functional covariates. Spatial Statistics 10:27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, N., K. Nobrega, and J. Dunn. 2001. Income segregation, income inequality and mortality in North American metropolitan areas. GeoJournal 53 (2): 117–24.
   Google Scholar
• Salesses, P., K. Schechtner, and C. A. Hidalgo. 2013. The collaborative image of the city: Mapping the inequality of urban perception. PLoS ONE 8:e68400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., J. D. Morenoff, and T. Gannon-Rowley. 2002. Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 443–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., and S. W. Raudenbush. 2004. Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of broken windows. Social Psychology Quarterly 67 (4): 319–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., S. W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277 (5328): 918–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2010. A world without data? The unintended consequences of fashion in geography. Urban Geography 31 (8): 1009–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevky, E., and W. Bell. 1955. Social area analysis. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, A., and P. Longley. 2009a. Creating open source geodemographics—Refining a national classification of census output areas for applications in higher education. Papers in Regional Science 88 (3): 643–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2009b. Geodemographics, visualization, and social networks in applied geography. Applied Geography 29 (3): 289–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, A., and S. Spielman. 2014. The past, present and future of geodemographic research in the United States and United Kingdom. The Professional Geographer 66 (4): 558–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, D., and S. Hefter. 2014. Evaluating the impact of the 2011 sample reallocation for the American Community Survey. American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series, Report ACS14-RER-02, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Spielman, S. E., and D. C. Folch. 2014. Reducing uncertainty in the American Community Survey through data-driven regionalization. PloS ONE 10 (2):e0115626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman, S. E., D. Folch, and N. Nagle. 2014. Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey. Applied Geography 46:147–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman, S. E., and J.-C. Thill. 2008. Social area analysis, data mining, and GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32 (2): 110–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinley, D. 2004. Standardizing variables in k-means clustering. In Classification, clustering, and data mining application, ed. D. Banks, L. House, F. McMorris, P. Arabie, and W. Gaul, 53–60. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tarpey, T. 2007. Linear transformations and the k-means clustering algorithm. The American Statistician 61 (1): 34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin, K., and W. M. Rohe. 1998. Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation. Housing Policy Debate 9 (1): 61–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 (Supp.): 234–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. Design and methodology: American Community Survey. Technical Paper 67 (unedited version), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, D. 2006. Multi-level integrated classifications based on the 2001 census. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, Department of Geography, Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, D., and P. Rees. 2007. Creating the UK national statistics 2001 output area classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society 170 (2): 379–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar