Space–Time Analysis: Concepts, Quantitative Methods, and Future Directions

References

• Albert Einstein Site Online. 2012. Albert Einstein quotes. http://www.alberteinsteinsite.com/quotes/einsteinquotes.html (last accessed 26 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• An, L. 2012. Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 229:25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, L., and D. G. Brown. 2008. Survival analysis in land change science: Integrating with GIScience to address temporal complexities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (2): 323–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, L., D. G. Brown, J. I. Nassauer, and B. Low. 2011. Variations in development of exurban residential landscapes: Timing, location, and driving forces. Journal of Land Use Science 6 (1): 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• An, L., M. Linderman, J. Qi, A. Shortridge, and J. Liu. 2005. Exploring complexity in a human–environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (1): 54–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, L., M.-H. Tsou, B. Spitzberg, J. M. Gawron, and D. K. Gupta. Forthcoming. Latent trajectory models for space–time analysis: An application in deciphering spatial panel data. Geographical Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• An, L., A. Zvoleff, J. Liu, and W. Axinn. 2014. Agent based modeling in coupled human and natural systems (CHANS): Lessons from a comparative analysis. Annals of Association of American Geographers 104 (4): 723–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical analysis 27 (2): 93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2003. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26 (2): 153–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple Computer. 2000. Object-oriented programming and the Objective-C language. http://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/manuals/ObjC.pdf (last accessed 27 May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. P. 1988. Temporality in spatial databases. In GIS/LIS 88 Proceedings: Accessing the world, 880–889. Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
   Google Scholar
• Ashtekar, A. 2006. Space and time: From antiquity to Einstein and beyond. Resonance 11 (9): 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Assunção, R. M., I. A. Reis, and C. D. L. Oliveira. 2001. Diffusion and prediction of Leishmaniasis in a large metropolitan area in Brazil with a Bayesian space–time model. Statistics in Medicine 20 (15): 2319–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, L. D., and D. R. Butler. 2000. Space–time modeling of grizzly bears. The Geographic Review 90 (2): 206–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, V., and G. Sorger. 2001. A spatial-temporal model of human capital accumulation. Journal of Economic Theory 96:153–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H. 2005. Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Biggeri, A., and M. Martuzzi. 2003. Preface (Special issue). Environmetrics 14:429–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., and P. J. Curran. 2006. Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bothwell, J., and M. Yuan. 2010. Apply concepts of fluid kinematics to represent continuous space–time fields in temporal GIS. Annals of GIS 16 (1): 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G., S. Page, R. Riolo, M. Zellner, and W. Rand. 2005. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19 (2): 153–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G., B. C. Pijanowski, and J. D. Duh. 2000. Modeling the relationships between land use and land cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 59 (4): 247–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. G., D. T. Robinson, L. An, J. I. Nassauer, M. Zellner, W. Rand, R. Riolo, S. E. Page, B. Low, and Z. Wang. 2008. Exurbia from the bottom-up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system. Geoforum 39 (2): 805–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W., and J. Rasbash. 2004. Multilevel modeling. In The handbook of data analysis, 459–79. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, K., B. Huang, M. Li, and W. Li. 2014. Calibrating a cellular automata model for understanding rural–urban land conversion: A Pareto front-based multiobjective optimization approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1028–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., S.-L. Shaw, H. Yu, F. Lu, Y. Chai, and Q. Jia. 2011. Exploratory data analysis of activity diary data: A space–time GIS approach. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (3): 394–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T., J. Wang, and X. Li. 2011. A hybrid framework for space–time modeling of environmental data. Geographical Analysis 43 (2): 188–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. 2014. Analyzing space–time crime incidents using eigenvector spatial filtering: An application to vehicle burglary. Geographical Analysis 46 (2): 165–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y., and D. A. Griffith. 2011. Modeling network autocorrelation in space–time migration flows data: An eigenvectors spatial filtering approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (3): 523–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. C., S. Hoppen, and L. Gaydos. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 24 (2): 247–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, A. D., P. Haggett, J. K. Ord, K. A. Bassett, and R. B. Davies. 1975. Elements of spatial structure: A quantitative approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 1999. Space, time, geography. Geographical Information Systems 1:29–38.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. Ontologies of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24 (12): 1785–1809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2013. Geographic thought: A critical introduction. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dainton, B. 2001. Time and space. London: Cambridge University Press. http://journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?fulltextid=7026744 (last accessed 6 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• De Hevia, M. D., V. Izard, A. Coubart, E. S. Spelke, and A. Streri. 2014. Representations of space, time, and number in neonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (13): 4809–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmelle, E., C. Dony, I. Casas, M. Jia, and W. Tang. 2014. Visualizing the impact of space–time uncertainties on dengue fever patterns. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1107–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijst, M. 2013. Space–time integration in a dynamic urbanizing world: Current status and future prospects in geography and GIScience. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1058–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, S., P. Laube, and R. Weibel. 2012. Movement similarity assessment using symbolic representation of trajectories. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26 (9): 1563–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, P. J., Q. Guo, W. Li, and J. Doke. 2014. Space–time analyses for forecasting future incident occurrence: A case study from Yosemite National Park using the presence and background learning algorithm. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 910–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, J. A. 2010. Time-geographic density estimation for moving point objects. In Geographic information science, ed. S. I. Fabrikant, T. Reichenbacher, M. van Kreveld, and C. Schlieder, 16–26. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, J. A., and M. W. Horner. 2012. Probabilistic potential path trees for visualizing and analyzing vehicle tracking data. Journal of Transport Geography 23:72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, J. A., M. W. Horner, G. Hyzer, D. Lamb, and R. Loraamm. 2014. Voxel-based probabilistic space–time prisms for analysing animal movements and habitat use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 875–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes, J., A. M. MacEachren, and M.-J. Kraak. 2005. Exploring geovisualization. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P. 2010. Spatial panel data models. In Handbook of applied spatial analysis: Software tools, methods and applications, ed. M. M. Fischer, and A. Getis, 377–407. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. Dynamic spatial panels: Models, methods, and inferences. Journal of Geographical Systems 14 (1): 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2013. ArcGIS. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. http://www.esri.com/ (last accessed 17 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. M., and A. Getis, eds. 2010. Handbook of applied spatial analysis: Software tools, methods, and applications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Frihida, A., D. J. Marceau, and M. Thériault. 2002. Spatio-temporal object-oriented data model for disaggregate travel behavior. Transactions in GIS 6 (3): 277–94.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer, R., R. Knutti, S. R. Sain, D. W. Nychka, and G. A. Meehl. 2007. Spatial patterns of probabilistic temperature change projections from a multivariate Bayesian analysis. Geophysical Research Letters 34 (6): L06711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. 1970. Mathematical games—The fantastic combinations of John Conway's new solitaire game “life.” Scientific American 223:120–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. 2011. Multilevel statistical models. 4th ed. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2013. Prospects for a space–time GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1072–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, G., and J. Hipp. 2004. Longitudinal analysis for continuous outcomes. In The handbook of data analysis, ed. M. Hardy, and A. Bryman, 347–68. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guttorp, P., W. Meiring, and P. D. Sampson. 1994. A space–time analysis of ground-level ozone data. Environmetrics 5 (3): 241–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, A. E. 2003. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17 (3): 235–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstraand, T. 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers in Regional Science 24 (1): 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• He, C., P. Shi, J. Chen, X. Li, Y. Pan, J. Li, Y. Li, and J. Li. 2005. Developing land use scenario dynamics model by the integration of system dynamics model and cellular automata model. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 48 (11): 1979–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hinckfuss, I. 1974. The existence of space and time. http://philpapers.org/rec/HINTEO (last accessed 6 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., D. Levinson, A. El-Geneidy, and R. Wasfi. 2012. A Markov chain model of land use change in the Twin Cities. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Florianópolis Santa Catarina, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Janiak, A. 2009. Kant's views on space and time. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelman, and C. Allen. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-spacetime/ (last accessed 26 May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., K. Jones, and M.-H. Jen. 2009. Regional variations in voting at British general elections, 1950—2001: Group-based latent trajectory analysis. Environment and Planning A 41 (3): 598–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamarianakis, Y., and P. Prastacos. 2005. Space–time modeling of traffic flow. Computers & Geosciences 31:119–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. O'Kelly. 2008. A bootstrap based space–time surveillance model with an application to crime occurrences. Journal of Geographical Systems 10 (2): 141–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. P., and M. L. Moeschberger. 1997. Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, E. G. 1964. The detection of space–time interactions. Applied Statistics 13 (1): 25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraak, M.-J., and A. Koussoulakou. 2005. A visualization environment for the space–time cube. In Developments in spatial data handling, ed. P. F. Fisher, 189–200. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kulldorff, M. 2001. Prospective time periodic geographical disease surveillance using a scan statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 164 (1): 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulldorff, M., R. Heffernan, J. Hartman, R. Assuncao, and F. Mostashari. 2005. A space–time permutation scan statistic for disease outbreak detection. PLoS Medicine 2 (3): e59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 1998. Space–time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30 (3): 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1999. Gender, the home–work link, and space–time patterns of non-employment activities. Economic Geography 51 (2): 210–27.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2004. GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86 (4): 267–80.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Beyond space (as we knew it): Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1078–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M., and J. Lee. 2004. Geovisualization of human activity patterns using 3D GIS: A time-geographic approach. In Spatially integrated social science, ed. M. F. Goodchild, and D. G. Janelle, 48–66. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., and T. Neutens. 2014. Guest editorial: Space–time research in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 851–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., N. Xiao, and G. Ding. 2014. Assessing activity pattern similarity with multidimensional sequence alignment based on a multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithm. Geographical Analysis 46 (3): 297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laube, P., T. Dennis, P. Forer, and M. Walker. 2007. Movement beyond the snapshot—Dynamic analysis of geospatial lifelines. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 31:481–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laube, P., and R. S. Purves. 2011. How fast is a cow? Cross-scale analysis of movement data. Transactions in GIS 15 (3): 401–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., R. Devillers, and O. Hoeber. 2014. Navigating spatio-temporal data with temporal zoom and pan in a multi-touch environment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1128–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L., and J. Yu. 2010. Some recent developments in spatial panel data models. Regional Science & Urban Economics 40:255–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gallo, J. 2004. Space–time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review 27 (2): 138–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovici, D. G., C. Claramunt, D. L. Guyader, and D. Brossetb. 2014. Local and global spatio-temporal entropy indices based on distance-ratios and co-occurrences distributions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1061–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenntorp, B. 1976. Paths in space–time environments: A time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography Series B Human Geography 44. http://www.popline.org/node/458894 (last accessed 12 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Levine, N. 2004. Space–time analysis. In CrimeStat III, 9.1–9.42. Houston, TX: Ned Levine and Associates. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/CrimeStat/files/CrimeStatChapter.9.pdf (last accessed 17 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Liao, F., S. Rasouli, and H. Timmermans. 2014. Incorporating activity-travel time uncertainty and stochastic space–time prisms in multistate supernetworks for activity-travel scheduling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 928–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., T. Dietz, S. R. Carpenter, M. Alberti, C. Folke, E. Moran, A. N. Pell, et al. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317 (5844): 1513–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., W. Y. Yan, and J. Y. J. Chow. 2015. Time-geographic relationships between vector fields of activity patterns and transport systems. Journal of Transport Geography 42:22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., D. Tong, and X. Liu. 2014. Measuring spatial autocorrelation of vectors. Geographical Analysis. doi:10.1111/gean.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. A., and T. A. Nelson. 2013. A review of quantitative methods for movement data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27 (2): 292–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. A., T. A. Nelson, and F. S. Nathoo. 2014. Toward a kinetic-based probabilistic time geography. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 855–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lophaven, S., J. Carstensen, and H. Rootzén. 2004. Space–time modeling of environmental monitoring data. Environment and Ecological Statistics 11:237–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27 (2, Part 1): 209–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, V. 2013. Biology: The big challenges of big data. Nature 498 (7453): 255–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1999. Space–time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24 (3): 261–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meentemeyer, V. 1989. Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale. Landscape Ecology 3 (3–4): 163–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, B., and E. F. Lambin. 2000. Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (3): 467–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina, J. P., and S. J. Walsh. 2001. 2.5D morphogenesis: Modeling landuse and landcover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Plant Ecology 156 (1): 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. 2005. What about people in geographic information science. In Re-presenting geographic information systems, ed. P. Fisher and D. J. Unwin, 215–42. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nail, A. J., J. M. Hughes-Oliver, and J. F. Monahan. 2011. Quantifying local creation and regional transport using a hierarchical space–time model of ozone as a function of observed NOx, a latent space–time VOC process, emissions, and meteorology. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics 16 (1): 17–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaya, T. 2013. Analytical data transformations in space–time region: Three stories of space–time cube. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1100–06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2014. Advancing land change modeling: Opportunities and research requirements. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Natvig, B., and I. F. Tvete. 2007. Bayesian hierarchical space–time modeling of earthquake data. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 9 (1): 89–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neutens, T., T. Schwanen, F. Witlox, and P. De Maeyer. 2008. My space or your space? Towards a measure of joint accessibility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32 (5): 331–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nöllenburg, M. 2007. Geographic visualization. In Human-centered visualization environments, ed. A. Kerren, A. Ebert, and J. Meyer, 257–94. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R., and K. Cooperrider. 2013. The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (5): 220–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana, D., and M. Wachowicz. 2011. Exploring patterns of movement suspension in pedestrian mobility. Geographical Analysis 43 (3): 241–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, D. 2004. Complexity science and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (3): 282–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oud, J. H. L., H. Folmer, R. Patuelli, and P. Nijkamp. 2012. Continuous‐time modeling with spatial dependence. Geographical Analysis 44 (1): 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., S. M. Manson, M. A. Janssen, M. J. Hoffmann, and P. Deadman. 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (2): 314–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. A., M. Basson, M. V. Bravington, and J. S. Gunn. 2009. Classifying movement behaviour in relation to environmental conditions using hidden Markov models. Journal of Animal Ecology 78 (6): 1113–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. J. 1994. It's about time: A conceptual framework for the representation of temporal dynamics in geographic information systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84 (3): 441–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2002. Representations of space and time. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. J., and N. Duan. 1995. An event-based spatiotemporal data model (ESTDM) for temporal analysis of geographical data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9 (1): 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, P. E., and S. E. Bodily. 1990. A test of space–time ARMA modelling and forecasting of hotel data. Journal of Forecasting 9 (3): 255–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyak, I., G. R. North, and J. B. Valdes. 1994. Multivariate space–time analysis of prestorm precipitation. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33 (9): 1079–87.
   Google Scholar
• Pontius, R. G., Jr., S. Peethambaram, and J.-C. Castella. 2011. Comparison of three maps at multiple resolutions: A case study of land change simulation in Cho Don District, Vietnam. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., A. L. Wichman, R. C. MacCallum, and N. E. Briggs. 2008. Latent growth curve modeling. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quespi, A. E. M. 1994. Pacha: Un concepto andino de espacio y tiempo [Pacha: An Andean concept of space and time]. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 24:155.
   Google Scholar
• Raper, J., and D. Livingstone. 1995. Development of a geomorphological spatial model using object-oriented design. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9 (4): 359–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, F., and M.-P. Kwan. 2007. Geovisualization of human hybrid activity-travel patterns. Transactions in GIS 11 (5): 721–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, S. 2001. Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis 33:195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, S. J., and M. V. Janikas. 2006. STARS: Space–time analysis of regional systems. Geographical Analysis 38 (1): 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, S. J., M. V. Janikas, and O. Smirnov. 2005. Exploratory geovisualization of spatial dynamics. In Geocomputation 2005, ed. Y. Xie and D. G. Brown. (CD-ROM). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. B. 2013. Real-time space–time integration in GIScience and geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1062–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, C., T. A. Nelson, B. Boots, and M. A. Wulder. 2007. STAMP: Spatial-temporal analysis of moving polygons. Journal of Geographical Systems 9 (3): 207–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhani, S., and H. Wackernagel. 1990. Multivariate geostatistical approach to space–time data analysis. Water Resources Research 26 (4): 585–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansó, B., and L. Guenni. 1999. Venezuelan rainfall data analysed by using a Bayesian space–time model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics 48:345–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepens, R., H. van de Wetering, and J. J. van Wijk. 2014. Contour based visualization of vessel movement predictions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 891–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W., and Y. Lu. 2014. Detection of dynamic activity patterns at a collective level from large-volume trajectory data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 946–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1964. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S.-L., H. Yu, and L. S. Bombom. 2008. A space–time GIS approach to exploring large individual-based spatiotemporal datasets. Transactions in GIS 12 (4): 425–41.
   Google Scholar
• Shoval, N., and M. Isaacson. 2007. Sequence alignment as a method for human activity analysis in space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97 (2): 282–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and H. J. Miller. 2014. Simulating visit probability distributions within planar space–time prisms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (1): 104–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, S. V. 2010. Multilevel modeling. In Handbook of applied spatial analysis: Software tools, methods, and applications, ed. M. M. Fischer, and A. Getis, 507–25. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Takada, T., A. Miyamoto, and S. F. Hasegawa. 2010. Derivation of a yearly transition probability matrix for land-use dynamics and its applications. Landscape Ecology 25 (4): 561–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W., and D. A. Bennett. 2010. Agent-based modeling of animal movement: A review. Geography Compass 4 (7): 682–700.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, W., D. A. Bennett, and S. Wang. 2011. A parallel agent-based model of land use opinions. Journal of Land Use Science 6 (2): 121–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, W., and S. Wang. 2009. HPABM: A hierarchical parallel simulation framework for spatially-explicit agent-based models. Transactions in GIS 13 (3): 315–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer moving simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46:234–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, P. M. 2014. High-resolution space–time processes for agents at the built–human interface of urban earthquakes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 964–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, C. 2014. Transcending the cube: Translating GIScience time and space perspectives in a humanities GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1149–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. C. 1970. An introduction to the philosophy of time and space. http://philpapers.org/rec/VANAIT-2 (last accessed 6 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N., D. G. Brown, L. An, S. Yang, and A. Ligmann-Zielinska. 2013. Comparative performance of logistic regression and survival analysis for detecting spatial predictors of land-use change. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27 (10): 1960–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikle, C. K., L. M. Berliner, and N. Cressie. 1998. Hierarchical Bayesian space–time models. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5 (2): 117–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., and Z.-C. Yin. 2011. The elements of probabilistic time geography. GeoInformatica 15 (3): 417–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., R. Li, and B. Huang. 2014. A geographically and temporally weighted autoregressive model with application to housing prices. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, X., and M. C. Carroll. 2011. Exploratory space–time analysis of local economic development. Applied Geography 31 (3): 1049–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., Y. Du, F. Liang, C. Zhou, D. Wu, and Y. Mo. 2014. A representation framework for studying spatiotemporal changes and interactions of dynamic geographic phenomena. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1010–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., R. de Jong, and L. Lee. 2008. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. Journal of Econometrics 146:118–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, M. 1999. Use of a three-domain representation to enhance GIS support for complex spatiotemporal queries. Transactions in GIS 3 (2): 137–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, M., J. McIntosh, and G. DeLozier. 2015. GIS as a narrative generation platform. In Deep maps and spatial narratives: The spatial humanities, ed. D. J. Bodenhamer, J. Corrigan, and T. M. Harris, 176–202. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, M., A. Nara, and J. Bothwell. 2014. Space–time representation and analytics. Annals of GIS 20 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z., S.-L. Shaw, and D. Wang. 2015. A space–time raster GIS data model for spatiotemporal analysis of vegetation responses to a freeze event. Transactions in GIS 19 (1): 151–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar