References
- Beall, J. 2009. Spandrels of Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cobreros, P., P. Egré, D. Ripley, and R. van Rooij. 2012. Tolerant, Classical, Strict, Journal of Philosophical Logic 41/2: 347–85.
- Cobreros, P., P. Egré, D. Ripley, and R. van Rooij. forthcoming. Reaching Transparent Truth, Mind.
- Field, H. 2008. Saving Truth from Paradox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Geach, P. 1965. Assertion, The Philosophical Review 74/4: 449–65.
- Gupta, A. and N. Belnap. 1993. The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Horsten, L. 2009. Levity, Mind 118/471: 555–81.
- Kremer, M. 1988. Kripke and the Logic of Truth, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17/3: 225–78.
- Kripke, S. 1975. Outline of a Theory of Truth, Journal of Philosophy, 72/19: 690–716.
- Restall, G. 2005. Multiple Conclusions, in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress, ed. P. Hájek, L. Valdés-Villanueva, and D. Westerståhl, London: King's College Publications: 189–205.
- Ripley, D. 2013. Paradox and Failures of Cut, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91/1: 139–64.
- Ripley, D. forthcoming. Conservatively Extending Classical Logic with Transparent Truth, The Review of Symbolic Logic.
- Rumfitt, I. 2000. ‘Yes’ and ‘No’, Mind 109/436: 781–823.
- Smullyan, R. 1995. First-order Logic, New York: Dover.
- Soames, S. 1999. Understanding Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Tarski, A. 1944. The Semantic Conception of Truth: and the Foundations of Semantics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4/3: 341–76.
- Wintein, S. 2012a. Assertoric Semantics and the Computational Power of Self-Referential Truth, Journal of Philosophical Logic 41/2: 317–45.
- Wintein, S. 2012b. Playing with Truth, Rotterdam: Optima Grafische Communicatie.