References
- Bach, K. and R. Harnish 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. The Communication of De Re Thoughts, Noûs 31/2: 197–225.
- Buchanan, R. 2014. Reference, Understanding, and Communication, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92/1: 55–70.
- Grice, P. 1969. Utterer's Meaning and Intention, The Philosophical Review 78/2: 147–77.
- Heck, R.G. 1995. The Sense of Communication, Mind 104/413: 79–106.
- Heck, R.G. 2002. Do Demonstratives have Senses? Philosopher's Imprint 2/2: 1–33.
- Heck, R.G. 2014. Semantics and Context Dependence: Towards a Strawsonian Account, in Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning, ed. A. Burgess and B. Sherman, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 327–65.
- King, J.C. 2014a. Speaker Intentions in Context, Noûs 48/2: 219–37.
- King, J.C. 2014b. A Metasemantics of Contextual Sensitivity, in Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning, ed. A. Burgess and B. Sherman, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 97–119.
- Loar, B. 1976. The Semantics of Singular Terms, Philosophical Studies 30/6: 353–77.
- Paul M.P. 1999. Success in Referential Communication, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic Luck, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Récanati, F. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Récanati, F. 1995. Quasi-Singular Propositions: The Semantics of Belief Reports, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 69: 175–93.
- Schiffer, S. forthcoming. Aphonic Terms and the Deep Problem with Gricean Meaning, in Meanings and Other Things: Essays on Stephen Schiffer, ed. G. Ostertag, Oxford: Oxford University Press.