614
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Intertwinement of Propositional and Doxastic Justification

Pages 367-379 | Received 05 Nov 2016, Published online: 25 Jun 2017

References

  • Alston, William P. 1983. What's Wrong with Immediate Knowledge? Synthese 55/1: 73–95.
  • Alston, William P. 1985 ( 1989). Concepts of Epistemic Justification, The Monist 68/1: 57–89. Page references to reprint in Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 81–114.
  • Becker, Kelly. Reliabilism, The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy URL = http://www.iep.utm.edu/reliabil
  • Bergmann, Michael 2006. Justification without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Boghossian Paul A. 2014. What is Inference? Philosophical Studies 169/1: 1–18.
  • Coliva, Annalisa 2014. Moderatism, Transmission Failures, Closure, and Humean Scepticism, in Scepticism and Perceptual Justification, ed. Dylan Dodd and Elia Zardini, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 248–71.
  • Conee, Earl and Richard Feldman. 1985 (2004). Evidentialism, Philosophical Studies 48/1: 15–34. Page references to reprint in Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 83–107.
  • Feldman, Richard. 2003. Epistemology, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Firth, Roderick. 1978. Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts?, in Values and Morals: Essays in Honor of William Frankena, Charles Stevenson, and Richard Brandt, ed. Alvin Goldman and Jaegwon Kim, Dordrecht: Reidel: 215–29.
  • Fumerton, Richard. 2006. Epistemology, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Goldman, Alvin I. 1979 ( 2008). What Is Justified Belief?, in Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, ed. G. Pappas, Dordrecht: Reidel: 1–23. Page references to reprint in Epistemology: An Anthology, ed. Sosa, Ernest, Jaegwon Kim, Jeremy Fantl, and Matthew McGrath, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell: 333–47.
  • Goldman, Alvin I. 2008. Immediate Justification and Process Reliabilism, in Epistemology: New Essays, ed. Quentin Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 63–81.
  • Ichikawa, Jonathan J. and Benjamin W. Jarvis 2013. The Rules of Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ichikawa, Jonathan J. and Carrie I. Jenkins forthcoming. On Putting Knowledge ‘First’, in Knowledge-First: Approaches to Epistemology and Mind, ed. J. Adam Carter, Emma C. Gordon, and Benjamin W. Jarvis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelly, Thomas 2016. Evidence, The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence
  • Kornblith, Hilary 1980. Beyond Foundationalism and the Coherence Theory, The Journal of Philosophy 77/10: 597–612.
  • Kvanvig, Jonathan L. 2007. Propositionalism and the Metaphysics of Experience, Philosophical Issues 17/1: 165–78.
  • Kvanvig, Jonathan L. and Christopher Menzel 1990. The Basic Notion of Justification, Philosophical Studies 59/3: 235–61.
  • Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. 2010. Is There a Viable Account of Well-Founded Belief? Erkenntnis 72/2: 205–31.
  • Pollock, John L. and Joseph Cruz 1999. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd edn, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Silva, Paul 2015. On Doxastic Justification and Properly Basing One's Beliefs, Erkenntnis, 80/5: 945–55.
  • Smithies, Declan 2012. Moore's Paradox and the Accessibility of Justification, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85/2: 273–300.
  • Turri, John 2010. On the Relationship between Propositional and Doxastic Justification, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80/2: 312–26.
  • Vahid, Hamid 2016. A Dispositional Analysis of Propositional and Doxastic Justification, Philosophical Studies 173/11: 3133–52.
  • Williamson, Timothy 2000. Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Zardini, Elia 2014. Confirming the Less Likely, Discovering the Unknown: Dogmatism—Surd and Doubly Surd, Natural, Flat and Doubly Flat, in Scepticism and Perceptual Justification, ed. Dylan Dodd and Elia Zardini, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 33–70.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.