Theism and Dialetheism

References

• Beall, Jc 2000. A Neglected Response to the Grim Result, Analysis 60/1: 38–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall, Jc 2004. True and False–As If, in The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, ed. G. Priest, Jc Beall, and B. Armour-Garb, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, Jc 2013. A Simple Approach Towards Recapturing Consistent Theories in Paraconsistent Settings, The Review of Symbolic Logic 6/4: 755–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall, Jc forthcoming. Christ: A Contradiction, The Journal of Analytic Theology.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, Jc and A.J. Cotnoir forthcoming. God of the Gaps, Analysis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall, Jc, R.T. Brady, A.P. Hazen, G. Priest, and G. Restall 2006. Relevant Restricted Quantification, Journal of Philosophical Logic 35/6: 587–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobenreith, A. 2007. Paraconsistency and the Consistency or Inconsistency of the World, in Handbook of Paraconsistency, ed. J.-Y. Béziau, W.A. Carnelli, and D.M. Gabbay, London: College Publications: 493–512.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Ross. 2006. Universal Logic, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bringsjord, S. 1987. Grim on Logic and Omniscience, Analysis 49/4: 186–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conee, E. 1991. The Possibility of Power Beyond Possibility, Philosophical Perspectives 5: 447–73.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume III: The Correspondence, ed. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. 1964. The Logic of Omnipotence, The Philosophical Review 73/2: 262–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, P. 1983. Some Neglected Problems of Omniscience, American Philosophical Quarterly 20/3: 265–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, P. 1988. Logic and the Limits of Knowledge and Truth, Noûs 22/3: 341–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, P. 1990. On Omniscience and a ‘Set of All Truths’: A Reply to Bringsjord, Analysis 50/4: 271–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, P. and A. Plantinga. 1993. Truth, Omnipotence, and Cantorian Arguments: An Exchange, Philosophical Studies 71/3: 267–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroon, F. 2004. Realism and Dialetheism, in The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, ed. G. Priest, Jc Beall, and B. Armour-Garb, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 245–63.
   Google Scholar
• LaCroix, R.R. 1977. The Impossibility of Defining Omnipotence, Philosophical Studies 32: 181–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mares, E. 2004. Semantic Dialetheism, in The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, ed. G. Priest, Jc Beall, and B. Armour-Garb, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 264–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrodes, G.I. 1963. Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence, The Philosophical Review 72/2: 221–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, H. 2012. Creation and the Sovereignty of God, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, P. 2007. Omniscient Beings Are Dialetheists, Analysis 67/3: 250–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 1990. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 1980. Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 1979. The Logic of Paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8/1: 219–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 2002. Beyond the Limits of Thought, 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 2006. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent, 2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 2008a. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 2008b. Many-Valued Modal Logics: A Simple Approach, The Review of Symbolic Logic 1/2: 190–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, G. 2016. Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayo, A. and G. Uzquiano, eds, 2006. Absolute Generality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Restall, G. 1992. A Note on Naive Set Theory in LP, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33/3: 422–32.
   Google Scholar
• Restall, G. 1997. Paraconsistent Logics! Bulletin of the Section of Logic of the Polish Academy of Sciences 26/3: 156–63.
   Google Scholar
• Rudavsky, T., ed. 1984. Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy: Islamic, Jewish, and Christian Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, K. 1993. On an Argument Against Omniscience, Noûs 27/1: 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburne, R. 1994. The Christian God, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitti, J. (writer) and M. Marcatel (director) 2002 (7 April). Weekend at Burnsie's, The Simpsons, New York: Fox Network 13/285.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Z. 2010. Transfinite Numbers in Paraconsistent Set Theory, Review of Symbolic Logic 3/1: 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Z. 2012. Transfinite Cardinals in Paraconsistent Set Theory, The Review of Symbolic Logic 5/2: 269–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Z. and A.J. Cotnoir 2015. Inconsistent Boundaries, Synthese 192/5: 1267–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar