926
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pain for the Moral Error Theory? A New Companions-in-Guilt Argument

Pages 474-482 | Received 05 Apr 2017, Published online: 08 Oct 2017

References

  • Bedke, M.S. 2010. Might All Normativity Be Queer? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88/1: 41–58.
  • Bradford, G. In preparation. The Badness of Pain.
  • Cowie, C. 2014a. Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Won't Work, The Philosophical Quarterly 64/256: 407–22.
  • Cowie, C. 2014b. In Defence of Epistemic Instrumentalism about Epistemic Normativity, Synthese 191/16: 4003–17.
  • Cowie, C. 2016. Good News for Moral Error Theorists: A Master Argument Against the Companions in Guilt Strategy, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94/1: 115–30.
  • Cuneo, T. 2007. The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Darwall, S. 2002. Welfare and Rational Care, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Das, R. 2017. Bad News for Moral Error Theorists: There Is No Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95/1: 58–69.
  • Fantl, J. and M. McGrath 2007. On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75/3: 558–89.
  • Finlay, S. 2008. The Error in the Error Theory, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86/3: 347–69.
  • Fletcher, G. 2009. Uneasy Companions, Ratio 22/3: 359–68.
  • Fletcher, G. In preparation. Is Well-Being Normative?
  • Foot, P. 1972. Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives, The Philosophical Review 81/3: 305–16.
  • Garner, R.T. 1990. On the Genuine Queerness of Moral Properties and Facts, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68/2: 137–46.
  • Hare, R.M. 1952. The Language of Morals, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hawthorne, J. and Stanley, J. 2008. Knowledge and Action, The Journal of Philosophy 105/10: 571–90.
  • Heathwood, C. 2009. Moral and Epistemic Open Question Arguments, Philosophical Books 50/2: 83–98.
  • Horgan, T. and M. Timmons 1991. New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth, Journal of Philosophical Research 16: 447–65.
  • Joyce, R. 2001. The Myth of Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joyce, R. 2011. The Error in ‘The Error in the Error Theory’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89/3: 519–534.
  • Lillehammer, H. 2007. Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mackie, J.L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, London: Penguin Books.
  • Moore, G.E. 1903. Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Olson, J. 2011. Error Theory and Reasons for Belief, in Reasons for Belief, ed. A. Reisner and A. Steglich-Peterson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 75–93.
  • Olson, J. 2014. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, and Defence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rowland, R. 2013. Moral Error Theory and the Argument from Epistemic Reasons, Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 7/1: 1–24.
  • Rowland, R. 2016. Rescuing Companions in Guilt Arguments, The Philosophical Quarterly 66/262: 161–71.
  • Streumer, B. 2017. Unbelievable Errors: An Error Theory about All Normative Judgements, New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.