Fallibility for Expressivists

References

• Baker, Derek 2018. Expression and Guidance in Schroeder’s Expressivist Semantics, Erkenntnis 83/4: 829–52. doi: 10.1007/s10670-017-9916-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddor, Bob 2019. Noncognitivism and Epistemic Evaluations, Philosophers’ Imprint 19/10: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddor, Bob and Simon Goldstein 2018. Believing Epistemic Contradictions, The Review of Symbolic Logic 11/1: 87–114. doi: 10.1017/S1755020316000514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon 1971. Moral Realism, in Morality and Moral Reasoning, ed. John Casey, London: Methuen.: 101–24.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon 1998. Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon 2009. Truth and A Priori Possibility: Egan’s Charge Against Quasi-Realism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87/2: 201–13. doi: 10.1080/00048400802362182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, Michael E. 1987. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bykvist, Krister and Jonas Olson 2012. Against the Being for Account of Normative Certitude, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6/2: 1–8. doi: 10.26556/jesp.v6i2.63
   Google Scholar
• Dowell, J.L. 2011. A Flexible Contextualist Account of Epistemic Modals, Philosophers’ Imprint 11/14: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, Andy 2007. Quasi-Realism and Fundamental Moral Error, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85/2: 205–19. doi: 10.1080/00048400701342988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, John and Ragnar Francén Olinder 2016. Non-Cognitivism and the Classification Account of Moral Uncertainty, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94/4: 719–35. doi: 10.1080/00048402.2016.1149199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan 2003. Thinking How to Live, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Simon David 2016. A Preface Paradox for Intention, Philosophers’ Imprint 16/14: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Stephen 2013. Concessive Knowledge-Attributions: Fallibilism and Gradualism, Synthese 190/14: 2835–51. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0088-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan, Terry and Mark Timmons 2015. Modest Quasi-Realism and the Problem of Deep Moral Error, in Passions and Projections: Themes from the Philosophy of Simon Blackburn, ed. Robert N. Johnson and Michael Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 190–209.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Sebastian 2015. What Is the Problem with Fundamental Moral Error? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93/1: 161–65. doi: 10.1080/00048402.2014.928736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika 1981. The Notional Category of Modality. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, ed. Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Rieser, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 38–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Garrett forthcoming. Making Quasi-Realists Admit of Fundamental Moral Fallibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David 1996. Elusive Knowledge, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74/4: 549–67. doi: 10.1080/00048409612347521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, Barry 2018. There are No Reasons for Affective Attitudes, Mind 127/507: 779–805. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzx011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley, David and Ryan Wasserman 2008. On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals, Mind 117/465: 59–84. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzn003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić, Berislav and John Schwenkler 2018. Intending Is Believing: A Defense of Strong Cognitivism, Analytic Philosophy 59/3: 309–40. doi: 10.1111/phib.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J.S. 1861/1998. Utilitarianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Alexander 2003. Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Sarah 2013. Epistemology Formalized, The Philosophical Review 122/1: 1–43. doi: 10.1215/00318108-1728705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Huw 1983. Does ‘Probably’ Modify Sense? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61/4: 396–408. doi: 10.1080/00048408312341151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, Frank 1926. Truth and Probability, in Philosophical Papers, 1990, ed. Hugh Mellor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:52–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, Michael 2015. I Might be Fundamentally Mistaken, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9/3: 1–22. doi: 10.26556/jesp.v9i3.92
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, Michael forthcoming. Normative Certitude for Expressivists, Synthese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Daniel 2012. Expressing Credences, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112/1/1: 99–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00327.x
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark 2008. Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark 2010. Noncognitivism in Ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark 2013. Two Roles for Propositions: Cause for Divorce? Noûs 47/3: 409–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepielli, Andrew 2012. Normative Uncertainty for Non-Cognitivists, Philosophical Studies 160/2: 191–207. doi: 10.1007/s11098-011-9713-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael 2002. Evaluation, Uncertainty, and Motivation, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5/3: 305–20. doi: 10.1023/A:1019675327207
   Google Scholar
• Staffel, Julia forthcoming. Expressivism, Normative Uncertainty, and Arguments for Probabilism, Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 6, ed. Tamar Szabó Gendler and John Hawthorne, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason 2005. Fallibilism and Concessive Knowledge Attributions, Analysis 65/2: 126–31. doi: 10.1093/analys/65.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, Charles Leslie 1937. The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms, Mind 46/181: 14–31. doi: 10.1093/mind/XLVI.181.14
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P.F. 1962. Freedom and Resentment, Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin, Nicholas 1999. Quasi-Realism, Negation, and the Frege-Geach Problem, The Philosophical Quarterly 49/196: 337–52. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, David 1989. Practical Reflection, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, Barbara 2014. Dispositions Without Conditionals, Mind 123/489: 129–56. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzu032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, Jack 2014. Expressivism and Moore’s Paradox, Philosophers’ Imprint 14/5: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, Seth 2007. Epistemic Modals, Mind 116/464: 983–1026. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzm983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, Seth 2011. Nonfactualism about Epistemic Modality, in Epistemic Modality, ed. Andy Egan and Brian Weatherson, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 295–332.
   Google Scholar