References
- Adams, R.M. 1979. Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity, The Journal of Philosophy 76/1: 5–26. doi: 10.2307/2025812
- Belnap, N. and M. Green 1994. Indeterminism and the Thin Red Line, Philosophical Perspectives 8: 365–88. doi: 10.2307/2214178
- Chen, E. and D. Rubio forthcoming. Surreal Decisions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
- Chen, E. and D. Rubio manuscript. Surreal Decisions II.
- Climenhaga, N. 2018. Infinite Value and the Best of All Possible Worlds, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97/2: 367–92. doi: 10.1111/phpr.12383
- Colyvan, M. 2006. No Expectations, Mind 115/459: 695–702. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzl695
- Colyvan, M. 2008. Relative Expectation Theory, The Journal of Philosophy 105/1: 37–44. doi: 10.5840/jphil200810519
- Colyvan, M. and A. Hájek 2016. Making Ado Without Expectations, Mind 125/499: 829–57. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzv160
- Hawthorne, J. and G. Uzquiano 2011. How Many Angels Can Dance on the Point of a Needle? Transcendental Theology Meets Modal Metaphysics, Mind 120/477: 53–81. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzr004
- Johnston, M. 2019. Why Did the One Not Remain Within Itself? Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 9, ed. Lara Buchak, Dean W. Zimmerman, and Phillip Swenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 106–64.
- Kraay, K.J. 2010. Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse, Philosophical Studies 147/3: 355–68. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9289-y
- O’Conner, T. manuscript. Why the One Did Not Remain Within Itself.
- Sider, T. 2009. Williamson’s Many Necessary Existents, Analysis 69/2: 250–58. doi: 10.1093/analys/anp010
- Vallentyne, P. and S. Kagan 1997. Infinite Value and Finitely Additive Value Theory, The Journal of Philosophy 94/1: 5–26. doi: 10.2307/2941011
- Williamson, T. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.