On the Possibility of Testimonial Justice

References

• Angwin, Julia, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner 2016. Machine Bias: There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And It’s Biased Against Blacks, ProPublica, URL= https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K.J. 1951 (2012). Social Choice and Individual Values, Eastford: Martino Fine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., J.-W. Romeijn, and J.M. Wicherts 2008. Measurement Invariance versus Selection Invariance: Is Fair Selection Possible? Psychological Methods 13/2: 75–98. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouldechova, Alexandra 2017. Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments, Big Data 5/2: 153–63. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett-Davies, S., E. Pierson, A. Feller, S. Goel, and A. Huq 2017. Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness, in Proceedings of the 23^rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York: ACM: 797–806.
   Google Scholar
• Dawid, A. Philip 1982. The Well-Calibrated Bayesian, Journal of the American Statistical Association 77/379: 605–10. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwoskin, Elizabeth 2018. Facebook Is Rating the Trustworthiness of Its Users on a Scale from Zero to 1, The Washington Post, URL = https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/08/21/facebook-is-rating-trustworthiness-its-users-scale-zero-one/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.aaa0972fc65f>F
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Hanming and Andrea Moro 2011. Theories of Statistical Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Survey, in Handbook of Social Economics, Volume 1A, ed. Jess Benhabib, Matthew O. Jackson, and Alberto Bisin, San Diego: Elsevier: 133–200.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda 2010. Replies to Alcoff, Goldberg, and Hookway on Epistemic Injustice, Episteme 7/2: 164–78. doi: 10.3366/epi.2010.0006
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J., S. Mullainathan, and M. Raghavan 2017. Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores, in 8^th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017), Vol. 67 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), ed. C.H. Papadimitriou, Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik: 43:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, Jennifer 2018. Credibility and the Distribution of Epistemic Goods, in Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism, ed. Kevin McCain, Cham: Springer Verlag: 145–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Mark 1999. Calibration and the Epistemological Role of Bayesian Conditionalization, The Journal of Philosophy 96/6: 294–324. doi: 10.2307/2564680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, José 2011. The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary, Social Epistemology 25/1: 15–35. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2010.534568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleiss, Geoff, Mannish Raghavan, Felix Wu, Jon Kleinberg, and Kilian Q. Weinberger 2017. On Fairness and Calibration, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: 5680–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, Thomas C. 2006. Micromotives and Macrobehavior, with a New Preface and the Nobel Lecture, New York: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenfeld, Teddy 1985. Calibration, Coherence, and Scoring Rules, Philosophy of Science 52/2: 274–94. doi: 10.1086/289244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimony, Abner 1988. An Adamite Derivation of the Principles of the Calculus of Probability, in Probability and Causality: Essays in Honor of Wesley C. Salmon, ed. James H. Fetzer, Dordrecht: Springer: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Philip E. 2017. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (new edn). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas C. 1983. Calibration: A Frequency Justification for Personal Probability, in Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, ed. R. Cohen and L. Laudan, Dordrecht: Springer: 295–319.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, Alison 2013. Why Standpoint Matters, in Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, ed. Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding, New York: Routledge: 34–56.
   Google Scholar