Semicompatibilism and Moral Responsibility for Actions and Omissions: In Defence of Symmetrical Requirements

References

• Byrd, Jeremy 2007. Moral Responsibility and Omissions, The Philosophical Quarterly 57/226: 56–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capes, Justin A. 2016. Incompatibilism and the Transfer of Non-Responsibility, Philosophical Studies 173/6: 1477–95. doi: 10.1007/s11098-015-0559-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Randolph 1994. Ability and Responsibility for Omissions, Philosophical Studies 73/2–3: 195–208. doi: 10.1007/BF01207667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Randolph 2011. Omissions, Responsibility, and Symmetry, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82/3: 594–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Randolph 2014. Omissions: Agency, Metaphysics, and Responsibility, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cova, Florian 2017. Frankfurt-Style Cases and the Explanation Condition for Moral Responsibility: A Reply to Swenson, Acta Analytica 32/4: 427–46. doi: 10.1007/s12136-017-0316-5
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, Taylor W. 2017. Moral Responsibility for Actions and Omissions: A New Challenge to the Asymmetry Thesis, Philosophical Studies 174/12: 3153–61.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John Martin 1982. Responsibility and Control, The Journal of Philosophy 79/1: 24–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, John Martin 1985. Responsibility and Failure, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86: 251–70. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/86.1.251
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John Martin 2010. Replies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80/1: 267–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, John Martin 2017. Responsibility and Omissions, in The Ethics and Law of Omissions, ed. Dana Kay Nelkin and Samuel C. Rickless, New York: Oxford University Press: 148–62.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J.M. and M. Ravizza 1991. Responsibility and Inevitability, Ethics 101/2: 258–78. doi: 10.1086/293288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, John Martin and Mark Ravizza 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J.M. and N. Tognazzini 2009. The Truth about Tracing, Noûs 43/3: 531–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry G. 1969. Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility, The Journal of Philosophy 66/23: 829–39. doi: 10.2307/2023833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry 1994. An Alleged Asymmetry Between Actions and Omissions, Ethics 104/3: 620–3. doi: 10.1086/293633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermes, Charles 2014. A Counterexample to A, Philosophia 42/2: 387–9. doi: 10.1007/s11406-013-9509-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, David P. 2000. Moral Responsibility and Unavoidable Action, Philosophical Studies 97/2: 195–227. doi: 10.1023/A:1018331202006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, Stephen 2011. Responsibility for Necessities, Philosophical Studies 155/2: 307–24. doi: 10.1007/s11098-010-9574-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, John 1690 (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, Michael 2008. A Hard-line Reply to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation Argument, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77/1: 142–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereboom, Derk 2001. Living without. Free Will, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereboom, Derk 2003. Source Incompatibilism and Alternative Possibilities, in Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities, ed. David Widerker and Michael McKenna, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing: 185–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorio, Carolina 2005. A New Asymmetry Between Action and Omissions, Noûs 39/3: 460–82. doi: 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorio, Carolina 2011. Actuality and Responsibility, Mind 120/480: 1071–97. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzr094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stump, Eleonore 1996. Libertarian Freedom and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities, in Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today, ed. Jeff Jordan and Daniel Howard-Snyder, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, Philip 2015. A Challenge for Frankfurt-Style Compatibilists, Philosophical Studies 172/5: 1279–85. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0349-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson, Philip 2016. The Frankfurt Cases and Responsibility for Omissions, The Philosophical Quarterly 66/264: 579–95. doi: 10.1093/pq/pqv127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson, Philip forthcoming. Luckily, We Are Only Responsible for What We Could Have Avoided, Midwest Studies in Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• van Inwagen, Peter 1978. Ability and Responsibility, The Philosophical Review 87/2: 201–24. doi: 10.2307/2184752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Inwagen, Peter 1983. An Essay on Free Will, Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, Manuel 2005. The Trouble with Tracing, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29: 269–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2005.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Michael J. 2002. Taking Luck Seriously, The Journal of Philosophy 99/11: 553–76. doi: 10.2307/3655750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar