Against Disquotation

References

• Andjelković, Miroslava and Timothy Williamson 2000. Truth, Falsity and Borderline Cases, Philosophical Topics 28/1: 211–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew 2013a. A New Conditional for Naive Truth Theory, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54/1: 87–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew 2013b. Quantificational Logic and Empty Names, Philosophers’ Imprint 13/24: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew 2015. Can the Classical Logician Avoid the Revenge Paradoxes? The Philosophical Review 124/3: 299–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew 2018. Radical Anti-Disquotationalism, Philosophical Perspectives 31/1: 41–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew 2021. Opacity and Paradox, in Modes of Truth: The Unified Approach to Truth, Modality, and Paradox, ed. Carlo Nicolai and Johannes Stern, New York: Routledge: 231–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew and Jeffrey Sanford Russell 2019. The Logic of Opacity, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99/1: 81–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, Andrew, John Hawthorne, and Gabriel Uzquiano 2016. Higher-Order Free Logic and the Prior-Kaplan Paradox, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46/4-5: 493–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caie, Michael, Jeremy Goodman, and Harvey Lederman 2020. Classical Opacity, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101/3: 524–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam 1995. Language and Nature, Mind 104/413: 1–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald 1967. Truth and Meaning, Synthese 17/3: 304–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr, Cian 2016. To Be F Is to Be G, Philosophical Perspectives 30/1: 39–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr, Cian 2020. Plural Signification and Semantic Plasticity. Carl Hempel Lectures, delivered September 2020 at Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry 2014. Naive Truth and Restricted Quantification: Saving Truth a Whole Lot Better, Review of Symbolic Logic 7/1: 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry 2017. Egocentric Content, Noûs 51/3: 521–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Jeremy 2017. Reality Is Not Structured. Analysis 77/1: 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, David 1968. Quantifying in, Synthese 19: 178–214.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, David 1995. A Problem in Possible-World Semantics, in Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus, ed. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana Raffman, and Nicholas Asher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul A 2011. A Puzzle about Time and Thought, in Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers: Vol. 1, New York: Oxford University Press: 373–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroski, Paul 2017a. I-Languages and T-Languages, in Reflections on the Liar, ed. Bradley Armour-Garb, New York: Oxford University Press: 141–90.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroski, Paul 2017b. Semantic Internalism, in The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, 2nd edn, ed. James McGilvray, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 196–216.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroski, Paul forthcoming. Fostering Liars, Topoi.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, Graham 1979. The Logic of Paradox, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8/1: 219–41.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Arthur N. 1961. On a Family of Paradoxes, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 2/1: 16–32.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, A.N. 1971. Platonism and Quantification, in his Objects of Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rayo, Agustín 2013. The Construction of Logical Space, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, Stephen 2002. The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine, Vivarium 40/2: 189–218.
   Google Scholar
• Restall, Greg 2008. Modal Models for Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth, Review of Symbolic Logic 1/2: 225–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Russell 1903. The Principles of Mathematics, London: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Russell 1908. Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types, American Journal of Mathematics 30/3: 222–62.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, B.H. 1986. Prior’s Analytics, Analysis 46/2: 76–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soames, Scott 1992. Truth, Meaning, and Understanding, Philosophical Studies 65/1–2: 17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, Dustin 2018. Paradoxes and Restricted Quantification: A Non-Hierarchical Approach, Thought 7/3: 190–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, Dustin and Richmond H. Thomason 2011. Paradoxes of Intensionality, Review of Symbolic Logic 4/3: 394–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar