3,919
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Disagreement for Dialetheists

Pages 192-205 | Received 18 Feb 2022, Accepted 19 Jan 2023, Published online: 31 Mar 2023

References

  • Barwise, Jon and John Etchemendy (1987) The Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Beall, JC (2013) ‘Shrieking Against Gluts: The Solution to the ‘Just True’ Problem’, Analysis 73: 438–45. doi:10.1093/analys/ant057.
  • Beall, JC, Michael Glanzberg, and David Ripley (2018) Formal Theories of Truth. Oxford University Press.
  • Beall, JC, Michael Glanzberg, and David Ripley (2016) ‘Liar Paradox’, in Edward N Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/liar-paradox/.
  • Berto, Francesco (2014) ‘Absolute Contradiction, Dialetheism, and Revenge’, Review of Symbolic Logic 7: 193–207. doi:10.1017/s175502031400001x.
  • Bex-Priestley, Graham and Yonatan Shemmer (2017) ‘A Normative Theory of Disagreement’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3: 189–208. doi:10.1017/apa.2017.17.
  • Blackburn, Simon (1998) Ruling Passions. Clarendon Press.
  • Burge, Tyler (1979) ‘Semantical Paradox’, Journal of Philosophy 76: 169–98. doi:10.2307/2025724.
  • Asenjo, F G and J Tamburino (1975) ‘Logic of Antinomies’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16: 17-44. doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093891610.
  • Field, Hartry (2008) Saving Truth from Paradox. Oxford University Press.
  • Gibbard, Allan (2005) ‘Truth and Correct Belief’, Philosophical Issues 15: 338–50. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2005.00070.x.
  • Kripke, Saul (1975) ‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 72: 690–716. doi:10.2307/2024634.
  • Littmann, Greg and Keith Simmons (2004) ‘A Critique of Dialetheism’, in Graham Priest, J C Beall and Brad Armour-Garb, eds., The Law of Non-Contradiction: 314–35. Oxford University Press.
  • McGee, Vann (1991) Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox. Hackett.
  • Murzi, Julien and Massimiliano Carrara (2015) ‘Denial and Disagreement’, Topoi 34: 109–19. doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9278-z.
  • Parsons, Terence (1990) ‘True Contradictions’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20: 335–53. doi:10.1080/00455091.1990.10716495.
  • Petersen, Uwe (2000) ‘Logic Without Contraction as based on Inclusion and Unrestricted Abstraction’, Studia Logica 64: 365–403. doi:10.1023/A:1005293713265.
  • Priest, Graham, J C Beall, and Brad Armour-Garb, eds. (2004) The Law of Non-Contradiction. New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
  • Priest, Graham (1979) ‘The logic of paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 219–41. doi:10.1007/bf00258428
  • Priest, Graham (2006a) Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Clarendon Press.
  • Priest, Graham (2006b) In Contradiction, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.
  • Richard, Mark (2008) When Truth Gives Out. Oxford University Press.
  • Ridge, Michael (2014) Impassioned Belief. Oxford University Press.
  • Routley, Richard and Robert K Meyer (1976) ‘Dialectical Logic, Classical Logic, and the Consistency of the World’, Studies in Soviet Thought 16: 1–25. doi:10.1007/bf00832085.
  • Schroeder, Mark (2010) ‘How to be an Expressivist about Truth’, in Cory D Wright and Nikolaj J L L Pedersen, eds., New Waves in Truth: 282–98. Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Shapiro, Stewart (2004) ‘Simple Truth, Contradiction and Consistency’, in Graham Priest, JC Beall, and Brad Armour-Garb, eds., The Law of Non-Contradiction. New Philosophical Essays: 336–54. Oxford University Press.
  • Shemmer, Yonatan and Graham Bex-Priestley (2021) ‘Disagreement without Belief’, Metaphilosophy 52: 494–507. doi:10.1111/meta.12489.
  • Stevenson, Charles (1944) Ethics and Language. Yale University Press.
  • Tarski, Alfred (1935/1983) ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages ‘, in John Corcoran, ed., Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd edition: 152–278, J H Woodger, trans. Hackett.
  • Velleman, David (2000) The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.