Counting Your Chickens

References

• Barnett, Zach (2020) ‘Why You Should Vote to Change the Outcome’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 48: 422–46. doi:10.1111/papa.12177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, John (2019) ‘Against Denialism’, Monist 102: 110–29. doi:10.1093/monist/ony024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budolfson, Mark Bryant (2015) ‘Is It Wrong to Eat Meat from Factory Farms? If so, Why?’, in Ben Bramble and Bob Fischer, eds., The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat: 1–22. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budolfson, Mark Bryant (2019) ‘The Inefficacy Objection to Consequentialism and the Problem with the Expected Consequences Response’, Philosophical Studies 176: 1711–24. doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1087-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chignell, Andrew (2015) ‘Can We Really Vote with Our Forks? Opportunism and the Threshold Chicken’, in Andrew Chignell, Terence Cuneo and Matthew C Halteman, eds., Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments about the Ethics of Eating: 182–202. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chignell, Andrew (2020) ‘Hope and Despair at the Kantian Chicken Factory: Moral Arguments about Making a Difference’, in John J Callanan and Lucy Allais, eds., Kant and Animals: 213–38. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durisin, Megan (2018) ‘Can Americans Eat More Chicken? U.S. Industry Bets on Growth’, Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-07/can-americans-eat-more-chicken-industry-bets-windfall-on-growth.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Bob (2019) The Ethics of Eating Animals: Usually Bad, Sometimes Wrong, Often Permissible. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlock, Grant (2018) ‘Costco Builds Nebraska Supply Chain For Its $5 Rotisserie Chickens’, NPR: All Things Considered. https://www.npr.org/2018/10/22/659561091/.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan (1990) Utilitarianism and Coordination. Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Gorin, Moti (2017) ‘Causal Inefficacy and Utilitarian Arguments Against the Consumption of Factory-Farmed Products’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30: 585–94. doi:10.1007/s10806-017-9690-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, Elizabeth (2015) ‘Eating Meat as a Morally Permissible Moral Mistake’, in Andrew Chignell, Terence Cuneo and Matthew C Halteman, eds., Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments about the Ethics of Eating: 215–31. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, John Richard and Richard Galvin (2012) ‘“Pass the Cocoamone, Please”: Causal Impotence, Opportunistic Vegetarianism and Act-utilitarianism’, Ethics, Policy & Environment 15: 368–83. doi:10.1080/21550085.2012.730258.
   Google Scholar
• Hedden, Brian (2020) ‘Consequentialism and Collective Action’, Ethics 130: 530–54. doi:10.1086/708535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, Shelly (2011) ‘Do I Make a Difference?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 39: 105–41. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01203.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, Ewan and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2018) ‘What’s Wrong with Joyguzzling?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21: 169–86. doi:10.1007/s10677-017-9859-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, Howard, Nathan Novemsky, and Daniel Kahneman (2001) ‘Making Low Probabilities Useful’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23: 103–20. doi:10.1023/A:1011111601406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, Steven and Matthew C Halteman (2019) ‘Against Inefficacy Objections: The Real Economic Impact of Individual Consumer Choices on Animal Agriculture’, Food Ethics 2: 93–110. doi:10.1007/s41055-018-00030-4.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram (2015) ‘Why I Am a Vegan (and You Should Be One Too)’, in Andrew Chignell, Terence Cuneo and Matthew C Halteman, eds., Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments about the Ethics of Eating: 73–91. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nefsky, Julia (2011) ‘Consequentialism and the Problem of Collective Harm: A Reply to Kagan’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 39: 364–95. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2012.01209.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefsky, Julia (2017) ‘How You Can Help, Without Making a Difference’, Philosophical Studies 174: 2743–67. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0808-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefsky, Julia (2019) ‘Collective Harm and the Inefficacy Problem’, Philosophy Compass 14: e12587. doi:10.1111/phc3.12587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, Alastair (2004) ‘Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases’, Philosophical Perspectives 18: 229–45. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00027.x.
   Google Scholar
• Norcross, Alastair (2020) ‘The Impotence of the Causal Impotence Objection’, Southwest Philosophy Review 36: 161–68. doi:10.5840/swphilreview202036118.
   Google Scholar
• Norwood, F Bailey, Jayson L Lusk, et al. (2011) Compassion, by the Pound: The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek (1986) Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Peter (1980) ‘Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 9: 325–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2005) ‘It’s Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligations’, in Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Richard Howarth, eds., Perspectives on Climate Change: 221–53. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yaffe-Bellany, David and Michael Corkery (2020) ‘Dumped Milk, Smashed Eggs, Plowed Vegetables: Food Waste of the Pandemic’, New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/business/coronavirus-destroying-food.html.
   Google Scholar