A Chaotic Field of Practice: Financial Reporting of the Library Collections of Australia's Public Universities, 2007–2011

References

• Anderson, Craig, and JeaniePham. 2013. “Practical Overlap: The Possibility of Replacing Print Books with E-Books.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries44 (1): 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Accounting Standards Board. 2009. “Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements.” Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Allan. 1999. “Land Under Roads – A Financial Bonanza or Fool's Gold?” Australian Accounting Review9 (17): 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Allan.2000. “Accounting for Public Heritage Facilities – Assets or Liabilities of the Government?” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal13 (2): 219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Allan. 2005. “The Conceptual Arguments Concerning Accounting for Public Heritage Assets: A Note.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal18 (3): 434–440.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, Nola. 2012. “Accrual Accounting by Anglo-American Governments: Motivations, Developments, and Some Tensions over the Last 30 Years.” Accounting History17 (3-4): 287–309.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, John, Garry D.Carnegie, and Peter W.Wolnizer. 1999. “Is Archaeological Valuation an Accounting Matter?” Antiquity73 (279): 143–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, Salvador, and MartaMacias. 2001. “Institutional Pressures, Monopolistic Conditions and the Implementation of Early Cost Management Practices: The Case of the Royal Tobacco Factory of Seville (1820–1887).” Abacus37 (2): 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G. D., and B. P.West. 2003. “How Well Does Accrual Accounting Fit the Public Sector?” Australian Journal of Public Administration62 (2): 83–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G. D., and B. P.West. 2005. “Making Accounting Accountable in the Public Sector.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting16 (7): 905–928.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, Garry D., and Peter W.Wolnizer. 1995. “The Financial Value of Cultural, Heritage and Scientific Collections: An Accounting Fiction.” Australian Accounting Review5 (9): 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, Gary D., and Peter W.Wolnizer. 1996. “Enabling Accountability in Museums.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal9 (5): 84–99.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, Garry D., and Peter W.Wolnizer. 1999. “Unravelling the Rhetoric about the Financial Reporting of Public Collections as Assets: A Response to Micallef and Peirson.” Australian Accounting Review9 (17): 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, V. L., and E. H.Feroz. 2001. “Institutional Theory and Accounting Rule Choice: An Analysis of Four US State Governments' Decisions to Adopt Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” Accounting, Organizations and Society26 (7-8): 565–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawner, Brenda, and GillianOliver. 2013. “A Survey of New Zealand Academic Reference Librarians: Current and Future Skills and Competencies.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries44 (1): 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Mark. 2002. “Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: The Case of the New South Wales Government.” Accounting History NS7 (2): 93–124.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Mark. 2003. “Without ‘Reinventing the Wheel’: Business Accounting Applied to the Public Sector.” Australian Accounting Review13 (2): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Mark. 2009. “NSW Public Sector Accrual Accounting: Why did it Happen and has it Mattered?” Unpublished PhD diss., University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, Jennifer. 1997. “Not an Inexhaustible Resource: Valuation and Depreciation of Library Collections in the Queensland Department of Education.” The Australian Library Journal46 (4): 376–385.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W.Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, Haim, and JohnNeilson. 1993. “Financial Reporting by Local Government and the Disproportionate Requirements of AAS 27.” Australian Accounting Review3 (2): 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, Ewan, LynnAshburner, LouiseFitzgerald, and AndrewPettigrew. 1996. The New Public Management in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilling, Jeremy. 2010. “The Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing.” Campus Review20 (6): 17.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, Delfina, G. D.Carnegie, and L. L.Rodrigues. 2008. “Accounting Change in Central Government: The Adoption of Double Entry Bookkeeping at the Portuguese Royal Treasury (1761).” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal21 (8): 1144–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Haddow, Gaby. 2012. “Knowledge, Skills and Attributes for Academic Reference Librarians. Australian Academic & Research Libraries.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries43 (3): 231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 1995. “The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society20 (2-3): 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, Keith, KateKearins, and RuthGreen. 2005. “Knowing ‘The Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing’: Accounting for Heritage Assets.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal18 (3): 410–433.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, Christopher, and PeterMiller. 2012. “Rethinking Impact and Redefining Responsibility: The Parameters and Coordinates of Accounting and Public Management Reforms.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal25 (2): 295–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, Christopher, PeterMiller, and R. W.Scapens. 1993. “Accountability and Accountable Management in the UK Public Sector.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal6 (3): 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, Helen. 2011. “From Go to Woe: How a Not-For-Profit Managed the Change to Accrual Accounting.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal24 (7): 824–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, Michael. 2008. “Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice.” Accounting, Organizations and Society33 (4-5): 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and BrianRowan. 1991. “Institutionalised Organisations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W.Powell, and P. J.DiMaggio, 41–62. Chicago: (originally published 1977)University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Micallef, Frank, and GrahamPeirson. 1997. “Financial Reporting of Cultural, Heritage, Scientific and Community Collections.” Australian Accounting Review7 (13): 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Oakleaf, Megan. 2011. “What's the Value of an Academic Library? The Development of the ACRL Value of Academic Libraries Comprehensive Research Review and Report.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries42 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, Bradley N.2002. “Financial Accounting Reforms in the Australian Public Sector: An Episode in Institutional Thinking.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal15 (1): 69–93.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Treasury. 2010. Non-Current Assets Policies. Brisbane: Government of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed.Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• University of Queensland. 2002. Annual Report. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• West, Brian P., and G. D.Carnegie. 2010. “Accounting's Chaotic Margins: Financial Reporting of the Library Collections of Australia's Public Universities, 2002-2006.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal23 (2): 201–228.
   Google Scholar