Mental disorders and burden of disease: how was disability estimated and is it valid?

References

• Murray C JL, Lopez A D. The Global Burden of Disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020, C J.L Murray, A D Lopez. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Murray C J.L, Lopez A D. Evidence-based health policy: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science 1996; 27: 740–743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray C JL, Lopez A D. Global mortality, disability and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1436–1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melse J M, Essink-Bot M-L, Kramers P GN, Hoeymans N. A national burden of disease calculation: Dutch disability-adjusted life-years. American Journal of Public Health 2000; 90: 1241–1247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie C, Beck S, Bevan G, Raftery J, Silverton F, Stevens A. Estimating the burden of disease in an English region. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1997; 19: 87–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos T, Mathers C D. The burden of mental disorders: a comparison of methods between the Australian burden of disease studies and the Global Burden of Disease study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000; 78: 427–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer R. Mind matters: the importance of mental disorders in public health's 21st century mission. American Journal of Public Health 1999; 89: 1309–1311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun T B. The global burden of mental disorders. American Journal of Public Health 1999; 89: 1315–1318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross C P, Anderson G F, Powe N R. The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 340: 1881–1887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Hawthorne G, Vos T. The role of economic evaluation in mental health care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 35: 104–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord E. The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs. Medical Decision Making 1995; 15: 201–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer R L, Kroenke J, Linzer M, Hahn S R, Williams J BW, DeGruy F V, III, et al. Health-related quality of life in primary care patients with mental disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995; 274: 1511–1517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormel J, Von Korff M, Ustun T B, Pini S, Korten A, Oldehinkel T. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures: results from the WHO Collaborative Study on psychological problems in general health care. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 1741–1748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Sanderson K, Beard J. Burden of disease: methods for calculating disability from mental disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 173: 123–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord E, Pinto J-L, Richardson J, Menzel P, Ubel P. Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Economics 1999; 8: 25–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray C J.L. Rethinking DALYs. The Global Burden of Disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020, CJL Murray, A D Lopez. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1996; 1–98
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen T, Nord E. The value of DALY life: problems with ethics and validity of disability-adjusted life years. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 1423–1425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun T B, Rehm J, Chatterji S, Saxena S, Trotter R, Room R, Bickenbach J. Multiple-informant ranking of the disabling effects of different health conditions in 14 countries. Lancet 1999; 354: 111–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James K C, Foster S D. Weighing up disability. Lancet 1999; 354: 87–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouthard M E.A, Essink-Bot M-L, Bonsel G J. Disability weights for diseases: a modified protocol and results for a Western European region. European Journal of Public Health 2000; 10: 24–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Hall W, Henderson S. Prevalence, comorbidity, disability, and service use: an overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. British Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 178: 145–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization, Geneva 1993
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinski M, Keller S D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care 1996; 34: 220–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler R B, Ashton C M, Brody B, Byrne M M, Cook K, Geraci J M, et al. Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard. Medical Care 1999; 37: 580–588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Sanderson K, Slade T, Issakidis C. Why does the burden of disease persist? Relating the burden of anxiety and depression to the effectiveness of treatment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000; 78: 446–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto Prades J-L. Is the person trade-off a valid method for allocating health care resources?. Health Economics 1997; 6: 71–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves W A, Shumway M, Hu T-W, Cuffel B. Cost-outcome methods for mental health. Academic Press, San Diego 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lee T T, Ziegler J K, Sommi R, Sugar C, Mahmoud R, Lenert L A. Comparison of preferences for health outcomes in schizophrenia among stakeholder groups. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2000; 34: 201–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanita M. Self-report measures of patient utility: should we trust them?. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000; 53: 469–476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar