Ethnomethodological study of the values of Australian psychiatrists: towards an empirically derived RANZCP Code of Ethics

References

• Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics 2005; 19: 49–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedhecoe A. Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 2004; 18: 120–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman J. The future of empirical research in bioethics. J Law Med Ethics 2004; 32: 226–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis. Med Healthcare Philos 2004; 7: 41–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haimes E. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics 2002; 16: 89–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman N, Starling B. Mental disorder ethics: theory and empirical investigation. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 94–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J. Theory of valuation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1939
   Google Scholar
• Hartman R. The Structure of value: foundations of scientific axiology. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL 1967
   Google Scholar
• Robertson M, Pols H, Walter G. The social construction of values and the psychiatric profession part 1: conceptual issues and the case of Argentine psychiatry. J Ethics Ment Health 2008; 3.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson M, Kerridge I, Walter G. The social construction of values and the psychiatric profession part 2: a pilot ethnomethodological study. J Ethics Ment Health 2008; 3.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Code of conduct of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Melbourne: RANZCP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pargiter R, Bloch S. Developing a code of ethics for psychiatry: the Australasian experience. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1994; 28: 188–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1967
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel H. Ethnomethodology's program. Rowman and Littlefield, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• Psathas G. Talk and social structure and studies of work. Hum Stud 1995; 18: 139–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Rigour in qualitative research. BMJ 1999; 211: 109–112
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, London 2006
   Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Morse J. Designing funded qualitative research. Handbook for qualitative research, N Denzin, Y Lincoln. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994; 220–235
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006; 18: 59–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry C, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualit Health Res 1999; 9: 26–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour R. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ 2001; 322: 1115–1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L. Handling qualitative data. Sage Publications, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualit Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Sadler J. Diagnosis/antidiagnosis. The philosophy of psychiatry, J Radden. Oxford University Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 1994; 309: 184–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veatch R, Gaylin W, Steinbock B. Can the moral commons survive autonomy?. Hastings Center Report 1996; 26: 41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov W, Waletzky J. Narrative analysis. J Narrative Life History 1967; 7: 1–38
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Walter G, Robertson M. Narrative ethics in psychiatry and the literature of youth. Psychiatr Ann 2007; 37: 810–815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charon R. The patient-physician relationship: narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 2001; 286: 1897–1902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles R. The call of stories: teaching and the moral imagination. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Brody H. ‘My story is broken; can you help me fix it?’ Medical ethics and the joint construction of narrative. In: Fulford K, Dickenson D, Murray T. Healthcare ethics and human values. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002:133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett D. Conditions of personhood. The identities of persons, A Rorty. University of California Press, Berkeley 1976; 175–198
   Google Scholar
• Richardson G, Waite P. Mental health promotion through resilience and resiliency education. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2002; 4: 65–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonanno G. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?. Am Psychol 2004; 59: 20–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson G. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. J Clin Psychol 2002; 58: 307–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yehuda R. Risk and resilience in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65(Suppl 1)29–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel G. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137: 535–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemi N. The concepts of psychiatry: a pluralistic approach to mind and mental illness. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bloche M, Marks J. Doctors and interrogators at Guantanamo Bay. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 6–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson M. Psychiatrists and social justice II: when the social contract fails. J Ethics Ment Health 2007; 2.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson M, Walter G. An overview of psychiatric ethics I: professional ethics and psychiatry. Australas Psychiatry 2007; 15: 201–206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar