Teak plantation smallholders in Lao PDR: what influences compliance with plantation regulations?

References

• Antilla JP. 2016. Implications of middlemen in smallholder teak production systems in Northern Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) [ Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Forest Sciences, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Bainton N. 2009. Keeping the network out of view: mining, distinctions and exclusion in Melanesia. Oceania. 79(1):18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird IG, Vue P. 2015. The ties that bind: the role of Hmong social networks in developing small-scale rubber cultivation in Laos. Mobilities. 12:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonitatibus E, Cook J. 1995. The group promoters resource book. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Castella JC, Bouahom B. 2014. Farmer cooperatives are the missing link to meet market demand in Laos. Development in Practice. 24:185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Castella JC, Bouahom B, Keophoxay A, Douangsavanh L. 2011. Managing the transition from farmers’ groups to agricultural cooperatives in Lao PDR. The Lao Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 23:161–191.
   Google Scholar
• Colfer CJP. 2011. Marginalized forest peoples’ perceptions of the legitimacy of governance: an exploration. World Development. 39:2147–2164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins RC, Dent B, Bonney LB. 2015. A guide to value-chain analysis and development for overseas development assistance projects. Canberra, ACT: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Forestry (DoF). 2015. Unpublished plantation statistics. Lao PDR: Department of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Ducourtieux O, Laffort J, Sacklokham S. 2005. Land policy and farming practices in Laos. Development and Change. 36:499–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer M. 2007. Turning land into capital: a review of recent research on land concessions for investment in Lao PDR (Vol. 1 and 2). Unpublished reports. Vientiane: Land Issues Working Group.
   Google Scholar
• Enterprise Development Consultants (EDC). 2002. Study on generating employment through micro and small enterprise and cooperative development in Lao PDR. Bangkok: Enterprise Development Consultants, International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan A, Laity R. 2015. Over-regulated and under marketed: challenges in supporting feasible verification processes in Lao PDR. Discussion paper completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR.
   Google Scholar
• Fogdestam N, Gålnander H. 2003. Small scale teak plantations in Luang Prabang province, Lao PDR—silviculture, ownership and market. Minor Field Study. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita Y, Phanvilay K. 2008. Land and forest allocation in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: comparison of case studies from community-based natural resource management research. Society and Natural Resources. 21:120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill J, Johnson P, Clark M. 2010. Action research. In: research methods for managers. 4th ed. London: SAGE. Chapter 5; p. 95–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hall D, Hirsch D, Li TM. 2011. ‘Powers of exclusion’ land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen PK, Sodorak H, Savathvong S. 1997. Teak production by shifting cultivators in northern Lao PDR. Paper to a workshop on ‘Indigenous strategies for intensification of shifting agriculture in Southeast Asia’, Bogor, Indonesia, 23–27 June 1997. Bogor: Cornell University and the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry. Technical Report No. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen PK, Sodorak H, Savathvong S. 2005. Smallholder timber production: example of teak in Luang Prabang. In: Improving livelihoods in the uplands of Lao PDR. A sourcebook, Vol. 2. Options and opportunities. Vientiane: NAFRI, NAFES, NUoL.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang HTN, Hoshino S, Hashimoto S. 2015. Cost comparison between FSC and Non FSC acacia plantations in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 6:947–951.
   Google Scholar
• Katz L. 2010. Red tape and gridlock. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 23:99–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SB, Alounsavath O. 2015. Forest policy measures influence on the increase of forest cover in northern Laos. Forest Science and Technology. 11:166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollert W, Cherubini L. 2012. Teak resources and market assessment 2010. Planted Forests and Trees Working Paper Series. FAO Working Paper FP/47/E.
   Google Scholar
• Kusumawati R, Bush SR, Visser LE. 2013. Can patrons be bypassed? Frictions between local and global regulatory networks over shrimp aquaculture in East Kalimantan. Society and Natural Resources. 26:898–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling S. 2012. Options for the development of a teak farmer’s organisation. Final report to Luang Prabang Teak Program.
   Google Scholar
• Ling S. 2013. Fieldtrip notes, Action Research Round 2. Report completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR, November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ling S. 2014. The rationale for, and feasible approaches to, the development of growers groups. Report completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR.
   Google Scholar
• Ling S. 2015. Enhancing value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR. Fieldwork notes Action Research Round 5. October 2015 Report completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR.
   Google Scholar
• Lund C. 2011. Fragmented sovereignty: land reform and dispossession in Laos. Journal of Peasant Studies. 38:885–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryudi A, Nawir AA, Permadi DB, Purwanto RH, Pratiwi D, Syofi’i A, Sumardamto P. 2015. Complex regulatory frameworks governing private smallholder tree plantations in Gunungkidul District, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics. 59:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley S, Bennett J, Smonty X, Stevens P, Mounlami K, Midgley D, Brown A. 2011. Scoping study payments for environmental services and planted log value chains in Lao PDR. ACIAR. Projects FST/2011/003 and FST/2010/012.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley S, Blyth M, Mounlamai K, Midgley D, Brown A. 2007. Towards improving profitability of teak in integrated smallholder farming systems in northern Laos. ACIAR. Technical Reports No. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley SJ, Stevens PR, Arnold RJ. 2017. Hidden assets: asia’s smallholder wood resources, and their contribution to supply chains of commercial wood. Australian Forestry. 80:10–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI). 2011. Beyond production: facilitating market access through farmers groups. LAO PDR: NAFRI. Policy Brief No 01/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Newby JC, Cramb RA, Sakanphet S. 2014. Forest transitions and rural livelihoods: mutiple pathways of smallholder teak expansion in northern Laos. Land. 3:482–503.
   Google Scholar
• Newby JC, Cramb RA, Sakanphet S, McNamara S. 2012. Smallholder teak and agrarian change in northern Laos. Small-Scale Forestry. 11:27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson B. 2009. Farmers and forest land use in Lao PDR and Vietnam [ Doctoral thesis]. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management.
   Google Scholar
• Ozarska B, Kanowski P, Bailleres H, Midgley S. 2010. Enhancing key elements of value chain for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR. Final Project Proposal FST/2010/012.
   Google Scholar
• Perdana A, Roshetko JM. 2015. Survival strategy: traders of smallholder teak in Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 17:461–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phimmavong S, Ozarska B, Midgley S, Keenan R. 2009. Forest and plantation development in Laos: history, development and impact for rural communities. International Forestry Review. 11:501–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramcilovic-Suominen S, Epstein G. 2012. Towards an analytical framework for forest law compliance. International Forestry Review. 14:326–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramcilovic-Suominen S, Hansen CP. 2012. Why some forest rules are obeyed and others violated by farmers in Ghana: instrumental and normative perspective of forest law compliance. Forest Policy and Economics. 23:46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohadi D, Herawati T, Padoch C, Race D. 2015. Making timber plantations an attractive business for smallholders. CIFOR Indonesia No. 114, March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel TK. 2008. Forest policy changes in the tropics: an emerging research priority. Global Environmental Change. 18:253–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said A. 2015. Transaction costs associated with growing and selling smallholder plantation grown wood in Lao PDR – incidence and mitigations. Discussion Paper completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider T. 2014. Legal compliance and verification of small-scale producers in Lao PDR’s forest sector. Chatham House: Indicators of illegal logging project.
   Google Scholar
• Sisanonh S. 2013. Support for farmers organizations. Presentation to the Sector Working Group on Agriculture and Natural Resources (SWGANR), PowerPoint presentation.
   Google Scholar
• Smith HF. 2014. Smallholder plantation legality in Lao PDR: a study to assess the legal barriers to smallholder plantations and the associated timber value chain. Completed as a component of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) funded Project FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of the value chains for plantation grown wood in Lao PDR.
   Google Scholar
• Smith HF, Alounsavath O. 2015. Forestry legality compendium for Lao PDR. Department of Forestry and Department of Forest Inspection, supported by FAO/World Bank Cooperative Programme, GIZ /Pro-FLEGT VPA Support Programme, SUFORD – SU Project (DOF – Finland /World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Tsing AL. 2005. Friction: an ethnography of global connection. NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Benda-Beckmann F. 2001. Legal pluralism and social justice in economic and political development. IDS Bulletin. 32:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar